You need to read Rom, 6, 7,8, this might shed some light on this matter for you.
I have which is why I asked the questions I did, because it's not okay to sin.
You said, you were not talking about sinning and losing your salvation!............which is it??
Are you, or are you not speaking of, a Christian being able to lose slavation by sinning??
You are contradicting yourself.
It seems to me, you are not very honest, about what you are saying one moment and then cliaming what falling out of fellowship means, the next................which is it??
What are you really talking about?? You sound confused..........................?
I was making a point by using what Allinall said, there was no contradiction.
He was saying the only consequence of sin is falling out of fellowship with God, not losing salvation. I asked how a person could not have fellowship with God yet still be saved? It is clear that the scriptures teach that when you are doing God's will and living a life that is pleasing to him, a result of that is you have fellowship, and Jesus' blood covers you. They are all as one, not seperate. Take for example 1 Jhn 1:7
"But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin."
Again it says "if" we walk.......So on the flip side of that I continue to keep all three, should you choose not to walk in the light, then you won't have fellowship, and the blood of Jesus will not cover you, but you say it still would.
The unsaved will definitely perish if they do not come to Christ by faith in Gods Word, which He has spoken, JESUS IS THE LIVING WORD AND is that Prophet of Deut 18:15-19.
Those who are saved, ..........I give unto them eternal life; and they shall will never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
I and my Father are one. (Jhn 10:28-30)
Can you say that you, believe Jesus own Words at John 10:28-30??
Clearly in furthering the doctrine you embrace, you don't..believe Him.
If you say you do, How so?
I do believe him, cause in vs. 27 he is speaking about those that follow him.
You do not understand this verse this is why you ask such a question...if you underdstood the verser, you woul;dn't ask it... because of sin there can be no fellowship, however God does not disown his adopted children, because they have sinned.
For those that do not they have eternal life in Christ Jesus, the practice of disobedience as a matter of course, could very well be evidence they are unbelievers, and never really were saved, it is called self deception, It is not enough, to believe I know God, the question one should ask Himself, does Jesus Know me.
2 Tim 2
19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
I can accept a statement to this degree:
If a person comes to know Christ but still continues to hold on to sin knowing what Christ says about sin, then yes I'd question whether that person really was saved to begin with because of their knowledge of it. In this situation, I'd agree with your statement. However, there is other possible situations such as a person not knowing what Christ says about something, though they believe in God and accept him. Then something happens and then that person decides not to follow Jesus, to say that the person never believed, was not sincere in their desire to follow Christ, was never saved (because they didn't fully understand) I don't agree with.
Praise God, I trust in Jesus own blood who covers all of my sins, and not in my own abilities to keep the commandments perfectly, which I never could before I was saved, not to mention I had no interest in them to begin with. The word of God assures me, I was made perfect in Jesus even while dead in sin and tresspass, even the Faith I possess was given to me, by Gods Grace.
I suppose you would claim, you conjured up your saving faith??
If by saving faith you mean having the faith to believe in him and accept him, yes that was my faith because it was my choice to choose him or not. Did he give you the faith to believe in him? If so then there is no free will.
Are you saying a believer can't commit a deliberate sin?
I am saying the scriptures make it plain to me, that:
Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for
his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother. For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. (1Jhn 3:9-11.)
I suppose you would take issue with verse 9.........
No I wouldn't actually. The difference between you and I is the free will involved.
Amazingly, you believe I hate you because I point the error you perpetuate by not only believing this great deception, but wanting to teach it.
I never said I believed you hated me, again that is another incorrect assumption on your part. Honestly Petro, this has been a pattern for you to do and it really needs to stop.
I ask you, who is he that loves the brethern, one would teach them, doctrines which are man made, begun by the Father of lies, or one who would contends for the faith, pointing out error of heresy, even the doctrine of eternal Faith, denying the blood of Christ that bought them.
The fact is Christians should hate all lies, and should not perptuate lies from the father of lies, your doctrine is a lie.
Said the kettle to the pot.
I never said that, did I??
The OT, has been abolished, I guess I assumed you knew this, that will teach me, to assume things, when pointing out things like this..
The reason why the OT has been abolished, is because Jesus the Testator of the New Testament has died, it is a fulfillment of the OT prophecy of Jeremiah 31:31-34.
One can learn certain principles which are still relevant from the OT, buit we are not under the OT, for instance at the passage you quote, the sons shall not perish for the sins of their fathers but will perish for their own sins.
Ezekiel 33 that I quoted was a principle which is still relevent from the OT, which you stated one can still learn.
The 10 Commandments still serve their same purpose.
These Commandments, were never given, that by keeping them perfectly any flesh could ever be justified before God, they were simply given to be used to determine whether anyone had sinned against God, this is the only reason for the Law of Commandments, they are as a schoolmaster to bring man to Christ by FAITH, and when FAITH comes, that man (who comes to FAITH) is no longer under a schoolmaster (Gal 3:24)
cont'd..................