nChrist
|
 |
« on: October 29, 2018, 04:01:14 PM » |
|
________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 10-29-2018 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription _______________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Oct. 29, 2018 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/59146-mid-day-digest
THE FOUNDATION
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt.” —Samuel Adams (1749)
https://patriotpost.us/fqd/59145-founders-quote-daily
IN TODAY’S EDITION
The Left is politicizing and profiting on hate. Ginsburg is only partly correct to blame Congress for partisan judiciary. The “caravasion” is a sideshow to the real immigration crisis. Why would anyone vote socialist? Warren’s ludicrous DNA discrimination hypocrisy. Daily Features: Top Headlines, Memes, Cartoons, Columnists, and Short Cuts.
ALEXANDER’S ANALYSIS Politicizing and Profiting on Hate: From Bomb Threats to Slaughtering Innocents1
Mark Alexander
Last Friday, Cesar Sayoc, a Democrat-hating sociopath2 who drives a vehicle plastered with pro-Trump and anti-Democrat stickers, was arrested in Florida. He is the prime suspect who sent what I noted Thursday were likely inert mail bomb packages3 to 14 Democrat notables. As I wrote, “Given the amateurish construction, packaging, and delivery method, tracking down the threat package maker(s) will be swift.” And it was.
As I also noted, “To be clear, whether or not these devices were intended to detonate or disrupt, this is, by definition, an act of terrorism [as was] the case with the envelopes laced with the deadly toxin ricin, sent to the Pentagon and White House three weeks ago.” It is curious that there has been no information about whether the mail packages were intended to harm or a hoax intended to make headlines.
Tragically, over the weekend, there was hateful bloodshed. A self-styled neo-Nazi sociopath, Robert Bowers4, murdered 11 mostly elderly innocents5 at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh. According to reports, he may have been inspired in part because Donald Trump6 is the most PRO-Israel president since Ronald Reagan. As you recall, in May Trump boldly made good on a 23-year-old American commitment to move our embassy7 to Jerusalem.
Bowers reportedly yelled, “All Jews must die!” as he entered the synagogue, reminiscent of the much more frequently heard declaration “Allahu Akbar8” when Islamists are slaughtering innocents.
The leftist publication Slate declared, “Bowers made his hatred of Trump clear” — he believed “Trump was under the control of Jews, who are out to destroy Western civilization.” Reuters reported that Bowers “is a registered voter with ‘no affiliation’ who took aim [at] Donald Trump, accusing him of being a ‘globalist’ who did nothing to stop the ‘infestation’ of the United States by Jews.”
“Trump is a globalist, not a nationalist,” Bowers wrote on his social-media page prior to the assault. “There is no #MAGA as long as there is a kike infestation.” He also wrote, “For the record, I did not vote for him nor have I owned, worn or even touched a MAGA hat.”
There are on average more than 40 homicides every day9 in America, disproportionately black-on-black attacks in Democrat-controlled urban centers10 — the direct result of generations of leftist social policies. And those murder rates continue to rise11 because of those policies.
But the mass murder of a group of 11 people who have no connection to drug or gang violence, innocents targeted solely because of their faith, should inspire profound and universal righteous indignation in all of us. It should be one of those moments when we come together as a nation to universally condemn such hatred.
That notwithstanding, predictably, before the blood of these precious souls was dry, leftist politicos12 and their Leftmedia outlets13 were scheming how to politicize and profiteer from this tragedy. Unfortunately, all the Left has to offer is a platform of fear, hate, and division14.“
Beyond the knee-jerk calls for gun control15, two political narratives have emerged about the Pittsburgh assailant’s motives.
First is that he is a "right wing” neo-Nazi.
This characterization is correct, except for the commonly misunderstood “right wing” part. Today’s Democrat socialists16 don’t object to the increasingly violent so-called “antifa movement17” of self-proclaimed anti-fascist fascists, but they like to claim that sociopathic Nazis and other seditionist and anarchist groups are “right wing.” That may fit nicely into their politicized sound bites, but seditionists and anarchists, whose primary political goal is to overthrow our government, are by definition “leftist.”
That being said, there is no question that Bowers’s hatred was inspired by Nazism and the anti-Semitic rhetoric of Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
The second political/MSM narrative is an attempt to pivot the motive for his violence to the approaching “caravasion18,” the caravan of migrants organized and supported by leftist groups. They are now passing through Mexico, intent on forcing their way across the U.S. border — which is an invasion, despite the fact that most of these migrants are opportunists looking to better their lives. The MSM points to a recent post by Bowers claiming HIAS, a Jewish refugee agency, is behind the march. According to Bowers’s deluded perspective, “HIAS likes to bring invaders in that kill our people. I can’t sit by and watch my people get slaughtered. Screw your optics, I’m going in.”
But again, this is not rooted in Bowers’s concern about migrants; it is rooted in his anti-Semitic delusion that the organization of the caravan is a Jewish conspiracy.
Both of these narratives more closely reflect the anti-Semitic rhetoric19 of Democrat Party allies, including anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour and Nation of Islam founder Louis Farrakhan. Regarding the latter, John Kass wrote in the Chicago Tribune20, “Few if any Democratic voices are being raised against Farrakhan. The Congressional Black Caucus certainly won’t condemn him. And white Democrats aren’t demanding condemnation either. They don’t want to risk losing votes. This silence is dangerous.”
Bowers has been charged with numerous federal crimes, including 11 counts of Obstruction of Exercise of Religious Beliefs Resulting in Death, 11 counts of Use of a Firearm to Commit Murder During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence, and four counts of Obstruction of Exercise of Religious Beliefs Resulting in Bodily Injury to a Public Safety Officer.
President Trump and federal prosecutors are calling for his execution if found guilty21. The Left will likely object…
A final note on the hate profiteers, those other than the MSM profiteers whose market share and ad revenues depend on sensationalism. As I anticipated when first hearing about the Bowers assault Saturday, within hours, a reflexive fundraising response hit my inbox from the left-wing SPLC22, the nation’s most profitable hate-hustling “civil rights” group. In its fundraising “special edition,” the SPLC regurgitated more of its leftist rhetoric.
SPLC has an “endowment” of $320 million and in the most recent year of record, the organization listed revenue in excess of $58 million. So my question for the SPLC: The Pittsburgh assailant had a long history of racist rhetoric and activities — did the SPLC spend one dime of its endowment and revenues identifying this hater and reporting him to law enforcement authorities? Of course not.
https://patriotpost.us/alexander/59144-politicizing-and-profiting-on-hate-from-bomb-threats-to-slaughtering-innocents
IN BRIEF Ginsburg Blames Congress for Polarized Judicial Process23
Thomas Gallatin
The oldest justice on the Supreme Court has made a habit of publicly airing her political opinions, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg is at it again24. Alluding to the recent partisan fight in the Senate to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh25, Ginsburg lamented the polarization of the judicial confirmation process, assigning the blame to Congress. “To me,” she said, “the obvious culprit is Congress.” Well, as the saying goes, when you point one finger at others, there are three pointing back at you. Or, as Jesus said, “You hypocrite! First pull the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye.” (Matt 7:5)
It’s true that the Senate bears much responsibility for the partisan circus that is judicial nominations. But Ginsburg misses two huge points. For one thing, it was Democrats in the 1987 Robert Bork hearings who so outrageously character assassinated Bork that his last name became a verb to describe such vicious personal attacks. In 1992, Clarence Thomas suffered what he called a “high-tech lynching.” Democrats merely continued that “heritage” with their vile assault on Kavanaugh.
|