nChrist
|
 |
« on: May 16, 2017, 01:39:08 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 5-16-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
May 16, 2017
IN TODAY’S EDITION
The WaPo again exploits the Russia narrative in its active attempt to take down Trump. A dead DNC staffer may have played a role in getting this whole Russia narrative started. Trump’s communication skills continue to present problems for his own agenda. Daily Features: Top Headlines, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“[The press] corrupts, it deceives, it inflames. It strips virtue of her honors, and lends to faction its wildfire and its poisoned arms, and in the end is its own enemy and the usurper’s ally. It would be easy to enlarge on its evils.” —Fisher Ames (1807)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
The Latest WaPo Dezinformatsiya on Trump and the Russians1
According to the old adage, there are two sides to any story — unless it’s a Leftmedia hit piece, and then there is only their side.
Monday the Washington Post trumpeted, “Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador.” The Post claimed that Donald Trump disclosed classified information that “jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State.” The Post asserted the sources of this information were current and former unnamed U.S. officials. How’s that for ambiguity.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Reuters, CNN and BuzzFeed all got the same memo from the same “official sources” with the same objectives.
Monday evening, both National Security Advisor H.R. McMasters and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson insisted the Post’s “story is false.” McMasters stated, “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.” Tillerson released a similar statement which read, “During President Trump’s meeting with Foreign Minister Lavrov a broad range of subjects were discussed among which were common efforts and threats regarding counter-terrorism. During that exchange the nature of specific threats were discussed, but they did not discuss, sources, methods or military operations.”
Tuesday morning Trump weighed in with the following social media post, “As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.” That brought howls of accusations, claiming that according to the Post, “Trump just threw his top advisers under the bus … again.” We’re not sure how that phrase applies here because he didn’t contradict anything they said, even though that’s what the Post would have you assume.
Here’s a reality check: Nations with shared national security interests, in this case concerns about bombs on civilian airliners, share classified information on a regular basis. The ostensible reason for the Post report is not that sensitive information was shared, but a much more nuanced and complicated question of what protocols, sources and methods might have been compromised by sharing some piece of information. “Nuanced and complicated questions” are the stuff of great conspiracy theories, and lots of MSM advertising revenue.
It’s not like Trump kept classified information exposing sources and methods on a private unsecured server in a bathroom closet, as was the case with Hillary Clinton. Nor was it like Barack Obama, who whispered in the ear of Dmitry Medvedev that after his re-election he could cut a deal with Vladimir Putin and sell out U.S. national security.
The Leftmedia, of which the Washington Post is a flagship outlet, are propagating this story for two reasons. First, it sells. It’s the life blood of tabloids — and WaPo has devolved into little more than that. Second, the Washington establishment is terrified of this administration’s policy objectives, restoring Rule of Law and disenfranchising central government power — and the MSM is doing everything possible to disable and undermine those objectives.
The Significance of the Murdered DNC Staffer2
The Democratic National Committee is back in the news, and it’s not just because its being sued3 for not paying workers $15 an hour to campaign for a federal minimum wage of … $15 an hour. No, the real story is the DNC staff who was murdered in DC last summer. Why’s that a story? Let’s look at the history.
Last summer, WikiLeaks released a huge cache of emails from key Democrats revealing4 the DNC’s conspiracy to sabotage Bernie Sanders' campaign on behalf of Hillary Clinton. We suppose Hillary’s “reset” with the Russians worked, because the DNC blamed Moscow for the leaks. Democrats have been screaming about Russia “hacking” the election ever since.
A few weeks later, Donald Trump hit Clinton over her illegal unsecured email server by taunting5, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 [Hillary Clinton] emails that are missing.” What began as the Democrats' Russia hacking narrative soon became the story of Trump colluding with Vladimir Putin. Trump’s tease caught Clinton in an obvious contradiction, but Democrats used it to build a narrative.
Thus the import of what we learn today. Fox News reports6, “The Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down on July 10 on a Washington, D.C., street just steps from his home had leaked thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks.” Julian Assange, the tool who runs WikiLeaks, suggested this last summer, but he’s not exactly a credible source. Now, a federal investigator has confirmed it.
In any case, 12 days after Rich was shot from behind, WikiLeaks published the damning internal DNC emails — damning not because WikiLeaks released them or “the Russians” hacked them, but because of what Democrats themselves were saying behind closed doors. And then you’ve got John Podesta emailing, “I’m definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it.”
Death and Hillary Clinton7 have a long history, but this is getting ridiculous.
Top Headlines8
Pelosi pushes back on impeachment calls: Without facts, it’s hearsay. (Washington Examiner9)
WH: Despite reports, ransomeware software not developed by the NSA.. (CNS News10)
North Korea possibly behind global cyberattack, researchers say. (Fox News11)
North Korea’s missile launch a “litmus test” for Trump and South Korean leader. (The Daily Signal12)
U.S. accuses Syria of mass murder camp. (ABC News13)
Trump cuts all health care aid to international groups performing or promoting abortion. (The Washington Times14)
State troopers wrote 12,000+ more tickets in NYC so far this year than all of last year. (Reason15)
Chicago violence fuels gun sales surge, despite national dip. (LifeZette16)
Policy: Trump advances life-affirming policy in foreign aid. (Daily Signal17)
Policy: How a billion dollars is being wasted in the war on sugar. (Hudson Institute18.)
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report19. Don’t Miss Patriot Humor
Check out Premature Deaths20.
If you’d like to receive Patriot Humor by email, update your subscription here21.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Trump’s Messaging and Communication Debacle22
By Thomas Gallatin
Kellyanne Conway, senior counselor to Donald Trump, recently described her boss as “an unconventional president who is an excellent communicator.” While few would disagree with Conway’s assessment of Trump being “unconventional,” he’s a far cry from the Great Communicator.
While Trump’s talking over the media while working toward reforming government is certainly Reaganesque, his temperament and inability to clearly communicate and stay on message set him apart. Where President Ronald Reagan went out of his way to find common ground and unite the country, Trump is more apt to go out of his way to pick fights with his opponents — many of them needless or without any clear objective. Where Reagan overlooked an insult, Trump insults back twice as hard.
|