|
JudgeNot
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2004, 10:41:29 PM » |
|
WAIT a minute! I still want an answer to my chicken question!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Covering your tracks is futile; God knows where you're going and where you've been. JPD
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2004, 08:21:43 AM » |
|
I make lousy coffee, so I don't think I can help you...sorry Anyone can make a great cup of coffee aliesh! All it takes is Folgers, a coffee pot, proper execution of listed instructions, water, and viola! GREAT COFFEE!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2004, 08:27:16 AM » |
|
How many dents on a golfball? Titleist - 5,000 dents per ball Pinnacle - 4,997 dents per ball Top-Flite - 6,487 dents per ball... It's all in the company and the impression they want to make on their customers. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2004, 08:33:50 AM » |
|
(Or a goofball, for that matter?) The average number of dents required for goofball classification is one to many. As you can see, this is a rather ambiguous method for classifying goofballs. Hence, to call someone a goofball without proper classification thereto would be, and for all practical intents and purposes, inflamatory to say the least. Nevertheless, such improper classifications have been in the public eye for quite awhile. As no legitimate lawsuits have been enacted as a result of such careless classification, one would be led to the conclusion that the legal ramifications of such an act would not even be worth noting in respect to the classifier, and in fact, even less worthy in respect to the classifiee. But then, I'm not a lawyer. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2004, 08:38:39 AM » |
|
Whatever made you think of that Most likely a chemical reaction between a high glucose intake and exposure to high amounts of aerosol agitation. Either that or quick wit, but that doesn't sound nearly as technical. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2004, 08:45:45 AM » |
|
We Allinall know that the chicken HAD to come before the egg. However, allinall we have heard are theories, jokes and suggestions;
Oh, Knowitallinall, Why DID the chicken cross the road? The question of the ages brother JN, to be sure. However, the concensus has been for the past 55 years, that the chicken crossed the road in an inadvertant attempt to avoid questioning from persistant reporters concerning the very matter at hand, and was subsequently run over by a passing Edsel.
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: February 20, 2004, 08:49:05 AM » |
|
(Or, did the chicken really cross the road at allinall?) And here our brother has brought out the equally predominant question that has hounded philosophy classes worldwide for more than 50 years. Did the chicken, in reality, ever actually cross the road? I'll answer that with the philosophical response I've found most consistant with the concept: What exactly is an egg? Go. Think amongst yourselves. 
|
|
« Last Edit: February 20, 2004, 10:00:34 AM by Allinall »
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: February 20, 2004, 08:50:35 AM » |
|
*scratches head* So um, whata get for being the highest poster? Hehehe. The realization that you've got the most freetime of anyone on the face of the planet and the sorest fingers. *Winks at A4C* heheheee
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2004, 08:52:18 AM » |
|
You get the honor of displacing the current first place poster. *Using his best Captain Jack Sparrow voice...* "Tis a goal to be sure..."
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2004, 08:55:56 AM » |
|
What about post content? I don't post alot but my posts tend to be deep and take alot of time. Does posting a smile or a ditto out way content? Not in the least! Depth in response shows depth in personal growth. Smilies and dittos merely show agreement and a, may I say, childish attempt to further ones standing without depth. It's a shame that someone would stoop so low. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2004, 08:57:19 AM » |
|
We should have a standard amount of words required before a post is recognized. Ah, but some of the most profound statements take the fewest words. I've also always said that sometimes it's not the words that we speak that say the most. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2004, 08:58:57 AM » |
|
If we set a minimum of 1,000 words only A4C would have any at all.
I'm just kidding, continue on!
If such a minimum were to be set, we would have to include a provision that at least 502 of those words be your own.  I'm kiddin'!!!!!! I love your post Brother A4C!
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
NateyCakes
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2004, 09:00:08 AM » |
|
Hmmm, Any questions will be answered eh? Ponders upon: Just where does the other sock go when you put it into the dryer & come out with only one? Why do you drive on a parkway & park on a driveway? Why do they call it a pair of jeans when you only get 1 or a TV set? & just who in the heck invented the PH in front of words to confuse us? Phone? Physical? Phalaenoptilus nuttallii?     
|
|
|
Logged
|
~*Rejoice for the Lord is GOOD!!*~
|
|
|
Allinall
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: February 20, 2004, 09:02:35 AM » |
|
Depends on the content stick to the Absolutely true! I've read many long posts that in truth, had very little to say. I've read posts that had drivel galore, with absolutely no edificatory benefit, let alone any defensive quality to speak of! If I had a nickel for every contentless, worthless, even blatantly annoying posts I've read, that did absolutely nada for me, I'd have well over a dollar! But BEP killed that thread. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death"
|
|
|
|