The ACLU, footbaths and double-standards

The ACLU, footbaths and double-standards

The latest battle of religion in the public square is unfolding in Dearborn, Michigan, a city with one of the highest Muslim populations in the country. At the University of Michigan’s local campus, administrators have recently refitted several school bathrooms to include small footbaths in the corner–an accommodation for Muslim students who must perform ritual washing as part of their daily observance. The issue has more than a few of the usual suspects trying to explain their way out of their usual positions on the separation of church and state.

The Detroit chapter of the ACLU has scrambled to find a way to recuse itself from the matter, claiming that the footbaths qualify as secular since they could be used by non-Muslims, and therefore don’t cross the group’s usual bright church-state line. Further, the ACLU explains, the university’s decision to take on the $25,000 expense was motivated primarily “by health and safety” because some students didn’t like washing their hands in the sinks after others students had washed their feet. If that hadn’t been the case, the group says this religious accommodation would surely have merited greater investigation and criticism.

Uh-huh. This is the same ACLU chapter that in 2005 objected to a high-school wrestling coach saying a prayer with his team before meets, calling the action “inherently coercive.” And the ACLU of Michigan is already on the defensive for its non-action this time. In a letter explaining its silence regarding university footbaths, the ACLU notes that it “has often come to the defense of other religions when the state has attempted to interfere with their religious expression.” The letter even includes a list of cases in which the group has defended Christian clients. Too bad none of the examples prove much of a parallel to the current recusal over state recognition of a religious practice.

Of course the ACLU has “explained away” its double standard in how it scrutinizes government speech or action that involves religion. If a state agency today would have allocated $25,000 of taxpayer money to an explicitly Christian activity, particularly a permanent fixure requiring perpetual maintenance that serves no function to anyone aside from adherents of one faith, you KNOW the ACLU and Americans United would have already filed suit.

I have little issue with the act itself — the university installing these footbaths. As the editorial goes on to point out:

Freedom of religion has never meant freedom from religion, and making it easier for people of different backgrounds to practice their faiths is a perfectly American thing to do. Many schools have chapels on campus, a fact that bothers very few. And few places object to kosher offerings in school cafeterias–an accommodation for Jewish students causing no inconvenience to others.

I do have a problem with the ACLU’s hypocrisy and their long, slimy tongue-kissing of an enemy to America, CAIR (Collecting Alms for Islamic Radicalism).

(emphasis mine)

Yeah, right ..... This is why the ACLU is doing all they can to remove anything Christian from public. This is why a college removed a cross from a campus church. This is why the ACLU hasn't gotten involved with the government providing funds to build a mosque in Boston or to be involved with a muslin school in San Francisco being paid for by tax payers but they are involved in Louisiana state for the government there allowing two Christian churches to obtain a state grant. And the list could go on and on. The ACLU's silence on islam getting government support or actually supporting them in courts yet fighting against Christian groups getting the same treatment is getting more obvious by the day.