|
nChrist
|
 |
« on: January 09, 2020, 05:37:43 PM » |
|
________________________________
The Patriot Post Digest 1-8-2020
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
_______________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Jan. 8, 2020
https://patriotpost.us/digests/67774-mid-day-digest-2020-01-08
THE FOUNDATION
“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations, which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace … it must be known that we are at all times ready for war.” —George Washington1 (1793)
https://patriotpost.us/fqd/67772-founders-quote-daily-2020-01-08
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Iran’s retaliation won’t weaken Trump’s resolve.2
McConnell calls Pelosi’s bluff on impeachment.3
CNN settles with Nick Sandmann for fake, defamatory coverage.4
Daily Features: More Analysis5, Columnists6, Headlines7, Opinion in Brief8, Short Cuts9, Memes10, and Cartoons11.
FEATURED ANALYSIS
Democrats Invite Iranian Retaliation — Get Missiles12
By Mark Alexander
Allow me to assert what most analysts won’t dare: The Democrat leadership criticism of President Donald Trump’s13 decision to take out the two most significant Middle Eastern terror principals14 as they were planning imminent attacks on American targets is tantamount to a plea for Iran to attack the U.S. and our allies — so Demos can use that carnage as political fodder to further erode Trump’s 2020 election prospects. In effect, assuring Iran that retaliation will help it weaken Trump’s resolve is an open invitation to escalation.
Impeachment boss Nancy Pelosi insists, “We must ensure the safety of our servicemembers, including ending needless provocations from the Administration.” But the reality is, every time Pelosi and Chuck Schumer open their mouths, they effectively invite and empower violence against our military personnel, and against innocent men, women, and children who are most often the targets of Islamist extremists. And their politically motivated impeachment charade15 has emboldened our adversaries, most notably Iran and dictator Kim Jong-un’s North Korea16.
As for the provocation nonsense, Iran has been provoking the U.S. since the Islamist revolution in 1979, and it has now become the world’s wealthiest and most powerful state sponsor of terrorism. Fact is, Trump has exhibited a remarkable level of restraint despite recent Iranian attacks on our allies and the shoot-down of an American drone over international waters last June.
For contrast, recall that in 2016 before leaving office, Barack Obama17 sent Iran a 747 freight liner with $400 million in palleted cash18 as part of his $1.7 billion nuclear appeasement (read: “empowerment”) deal19, despite the fact that a few months earlier Iran had illegally taken American Navy personnel hostage20.
If that is what Democrats mean by “restraint,” those days are over. Can you imagine Trump’s response to Iran’s humiliation of captured American military personnel? Of course, Iran would not dare venture into those waters with Trump as commander-in-chief — for much the same reason it released our American hostages in Tehran almost 40 years ago, just minutes after Ronald Reagan21 was sworn into office.
So, in what I would describe as a expensive fireworks finale on the third and final day of state-induced mourning for Iran’s Quds Force (akin to the Nazi SS) strongman, Qasem Soleimani, the ayatollah launched 15 ballistic missiles into the Iraqi desert around Al-Assad and Irbil military installations. (Arguably, as Trump himself noted today, those missiles were funded in part by Obama bucks.) Iran made sure not to injure any Americans, or any of its pro-Iranian Shia terrorist militia units in Iraq targeting Americans — the same bunch that Soleimani instructed to attack our embassy in Baghdad last week before his demise.
Regarding Soleimani, retired Gen. David Petraeus22, former U.S. forces commander in Iraq and Afghanistan and former CIA director, affirmed: “It is impossible to overstate the importance of this particular action. It is more significant than the killing of Osama bin Laden23 or even the death of [Islamic State leader Abu Bakr] al-Baghdadi.”
Before the fireworks started, President Trump declared about the preemptive Soleimani hit, “We took action to stop war, not start war.”
After Iran lobbed missiles into Iraq, Trump said, “[We] will respond according to our own timing and choice,” and he noted that Iran’s attack “amounts to war.” Regarding our response, he reaffirmed24, “As long as I am president of the United States, Iran will never be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Iran has been the leading sponsor of terrorism and its pursuit of nuclear weapons threatens the civilized world. We will never let that happen.”
For the record, Trump did not create the Iranian threat; he exposed it. And he is now tasked with disposing of it.
Ahead of the attack, Defense Secretary Mark Esper was asked if Soleimani’s planned attacks were imminent, and he affirmed, “I think it is more fair to say days…” He also reiterated, “The United States is not seeking a war with Iran, but we are prepared to finish one,” and that included retaliation “against legitimate targets.”
Chief among those targets would be missile sites, three Iranian oil refineries, and, most notably, Iran’s nuclear-weapon-production sites — which, if struck, Iran will claim were “baby milk factories.”
Regarding the ludicrous claim by Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif that Soleimani was in Baghdad on a “diplomatic mission,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responded to the press pool: “Does anybody in here believe that? Is there any history that would indicate that it was remotely possible that this kind gentleman, this diplomat of great order, Qasem Soleimani, had traveled to Baghdad for the idea of conducting a peace mission? … Zarif is a propagandist of the first order.”
For context, recall that the strategic reason 5,000 U.S. military personnel are in Iraq25 (and 3,000 incoming) is largely to sustain the eradication of the Islamic State26 after Obama and Hillary Clinton empowered that terrorist resurgence27 between 2012 and 2016. The additional 45,000 military personnel in the region are there to protect vital U.S. national-security interests and those of our allies.
Finally, circling back around to the Democrats’ open invitation for Iranian retaliation, Sen. Chuck Schumer insisted just before the missile attack: “This president … doesn’t have a strategy and I am worried that he will, either by impulse action or lack of strategy, bungle us into war.”
Only a bungling idiot would think that our military does not have a strategy that long preceded the strike on Soleimani. On the other hand, what do you call a political leader who clearly knows we have well-defined strategies to defend American national-security interests in the Middle East but baits enemy attacks in order to use those attacks as political fodder?
https://patriotpost.us/alexander/67773-democrats-invite-iranian-retaliation-get-missiles
McConnell Can Override Pelosi’s Dubious Impeachment Demands28
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced on Tuesday that he has the votes of at least 51 Republicans to pass a resolution setting the rules for the Senate’s impeachment trial. Those rules do not include the preconditions House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been demanding ever since the House’s partisan vote to impeach29 President Donald Trump. McConnell pointedly noted that the Senate will adopt the same rules that were unanimously approved 20 years ago when Bill Clinton was impeached. He explained that any decision to call witnesses would be made only after the trial proceedings were underway, and only if deemed necessary by lawmakers, as was done during Clinton’s impeachment trial.
Pelosi and her partner in crime, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, claim that McConnell and Senate Republicans are playing unfair, which is a laughably hypocritical charge given the Democrats’ underhanded and obviously partisan conduct during House impeachment hearings. Furthermore, Pelosi rushed through the House’s sham impeachment proceedings in order to secure a vote against Trump, vacuously claiming that the issue was so pressing that it could not wait … only to stall sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate while building the false narrative that it is Senate Republicans and not House Democrats who aren’t playing fair.
McConnell has firmly stood his ground in refusing to give in to Pelosi and Schumer’s phony preconditions. They want an agreement to call four new witnesses — witnesses House Democrats could have subpoenaed if Pelosi had only slowed down her rush to impeach. This new demand is obviously part of Pelosi and company’s plan to flip the negative narrative that had grown around Democrats. Once her bluff was called, Pelosi announced that she will send the impeachment articles to the Senate once she’s seen the “details” of McConnell’s plan. It will be telling if she does indeed follow through, or if she once again cries foul. |
