nChrist
|
 |
« on: November 19, 2018, 04:51:19 PM » |
|
________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 11-19-2018 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription _______________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Nov. 19, 2018 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/59560-mid-day-digest
THE FOUNDATION
“The known propensity of a democracy is to licentiousness which the ambitious call, and ignorant believe to be liberty.” —Fisher Ames (1788)
https://patriotpost.us/fqd/59559-founders-quote-daily
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Georgia and Florida elections may be over, but the Demo narrative isn’t. One Democrat says, “Give up your guns; the government has nukes.” Daily Features: Columnists, Headlines, Memes, Cartoons, and Short Cuts. Featured Analysis: The worrisome state of military readiness.
IN BRIEF ‘Undermining Democracy,’ Democrat Style1
Nate Jackson
It’s all over but the recriminations in Georgia and Florida. Nearly two weeks after Election Day, Democrats Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum conceded (Gillum for the second time after reneging) their respective races for governor, and Sen. Bill Nelson has given in to mathematical reality in the Florida Senate race. Despite recounts (including by hand in the Senate contest), lawsuits, judicial activism, a serially corrupt Democrat election official in Broward County, and nonstop Leftmedia hoopla, all three Democrats failed in their attempts to steal election victories. But they did succeed in one critical goal: subverting election integrity in the minds of their constituents.
As we said Friday, Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election have nothing on Democrat schemes to undermine election integrity.
Clearly, Florida has some work to do to shore up election laws. But Georgia may be the more troublesome state. Abrams rose to prominence by running massive voter registration drives in order to flood Secretary of State Brian Kemp’s office with perhaps fraudulent registrations, only to cry racism2 when Kemp, who also happened to be her gubernatorial opponent, worked to sort it out.
That narrative is so key to her entire campaign that she isn’t going to let it go in defeat. She’s launching a political action committee called Fair Fight Georgia, which she will use to wage a legal battle. “Let’s be clear: This is not a speech of concession,” Abrams said. “In the coming days, we will be filing a major federal lawsuit against the state of Georgia for the gross mismanagement of this election and to protect future elections from unconstitutional actions.”
In her speech announcing she wouldn’t actually concede but rather found “no further viable remedy,” Abrams also expounded her narrative: “Trust in our democracy relies on believing that there are good actors who are making this happen. And [Brian Kemp] was a horrible actor who benefited from his perfidy. That’s problematic. … Will I say this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that.” Abrams admonished her supporters not to give up just because the process was “as rotten and rigged as you’ve always believed.”
Furthermore, the abortion-supporting Abrams added, “Something being legal does not make it right.”
Georgia voters best prepare for future election cycles to replay this manufactured grievance, as Democrats work to rally their urban Atlanta base with fairy tales of voter suppression in hopes of turning the Peach State blue.
P.S. Remember when Democrats lambasted Donald Trump for musing that he might not accept the 2016 election results if Hillary Clinton’s corruption and voter fraud won the day? Those same Democrats went on to create a two-year narrative of “Russian collusion” to undermine Trump’s victory. They’re using that playbook again in Georgia. “If [Abrams] had a fair election, she … would have won,” Clinton declared. As usual, Clinton’s account of What Happened isn’t exactly reliable.
https://patriotpost.us/articles/59558-undermining-democracy-democrat-style
‘Nuke Americans Who Resist Gun Confiscation!’3
Mark Alexander
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) is taking the lead on gun confiscation, beginning with what he calls “assault rifles.” You know — those extra dangerous rifles that he says are “more powerful and cause more carnage when used with a pistol-grip.” In an op-ed assault on the Second Amendment4, Swalwell, not the brightest Democrat, proposed an Australian-type gun “buyback5,” which sounds like a voluntary proposal … until he insists the government should “go after resisters” who don’t comply.
When challenged that this was the first step toward total confiscation, Swalwell insisted, “Wrong. Just assault weapons. Keep rifles, shotguns, pistols. Basically, the weapons that allow you to hunt, shoot for sport, and protect your house.” By the Left’s definition, “assault weapons” include many semiautomatic rifles. And as with nearly all Democrats these days, Swalwell reduces the Second Amendment to nothing more than hunting and home protection. Why the Founders went to such great lengths to codify a right to hunt alongside such essential liberties as free speech, religious liberty, and due process is never explained.
One of his critics fired back, “So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get.” Swalwell responded, “And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes.”
That’s right — Swalwell suggested that if you don’t comply with a “voluntary” gun buyback, the government will nuke you. “Trust the government. But also, we’ll nuke you if you resist.”
Memo to Eric: The first shots of the first American Revolution were fired when the British government attempted to seize arms in Concord, Massachusetts. And that IS the reason the Second Amendment was written into our Constitution — to guarantee the citizens’ right to defend against government tyranny. Nevertheless, Swalwell insists, “You claiming you need a gun to protect yourself against the government is ludicrous.” Says the guy who threatened to nuke American citizens.
For the record, Swalwell is assuming our military would wage a war against the American people at his bidding. Think again. The first hill they will take if so ordered will be Capitol Hill.
https://patriotpost.us/articles/59555-nuke-americans-who-resist-gun-confiscation
ON THE WEB TODAY
Paralyzed Children Should Transcend Politics6 — The CDC denies that illegals are bringing EV-D68 into the U.S. We’re not convinced. DeVos Rebalances Due Process in Title IX7 — The secretary of education restores students’ basic rights in sex-abuse cases. Video: Leftists Don’t Want You to Believe Your Own Eyes8 — The Leftmedia says the caravan is all hype and your concern is unwarranted. Video: Seven Ways to Stop Democrats From Stealing Elections9 — Stephen Green, Bill Whittle, and Scott Ott explore ways to reform elections so every vote is counted only once. Video: Endangered Syndrome10 — “One of the most heart-wrenching pro-life ad campaigns you’ve ever seen.”
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
59541 59544 59540 59539 59410
For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion11.
TOP HEADLINES
As predicted, GOP tax cuts prompt record government revenues (Hot Air12) Unemployment rate at record low in 10 states (CNS News13) Trump visits fire-ravaged California (Los Angeles Times14) Democrat senators sue to block appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general (Associated Press15 “It’s your right to go to the U.S.”: What I saw when I visited the migrant caravan (The Daily Signal16) Betsy DeVos formally unveils new Title IX rules (Reason17) CIA concludes Saudi crown prince ordered Jamal Khashoggi’s assassination (CBS News18) As CNN’s Jim Acosta returns, White House seeks “decorum” for press (The Daily Signal19) NRA, SAF file suit to block new Washington gun-control law (The Washington Free Beacon20) Humor: Amazon to provide all employees with Prime boxes to live in (The Babylon Bee21) Policy: Policymakers should listen to voters on school choice (National Review22) Policy: The good, the bad, and the ugly of new Title IX regulations (Washington Examiner23) For more of today’s news, visit Patriot Headline Report24.
https://patriotpost.us/articles/59554-monday-top-headlines
FEATURED ANALYSIS Why Our Military Forces Aren’t Ready for Prime Time27
John J. Bastiat
As if well over a decade of neglect and budget-vampiring weren’t enough evidence, it’s now official: The U.S. faces a “crisis of national security.” That’s the blunt verdict from the National Defense Strategy Commission (NDSC), the bipartisan, independent assessment board formed by the House and Senate Armed Services committees. Unlike previous go-along-to-get-along reports that attempted to “make nice” with both sides of the political aisle, this report pulled no punches, estimating that the U.S. would be hard-pressed to fight more than one major conflict at a time and might even lose a war against either China or Russia.
Never at the top of any Democrat president’s priority list, national defense took an especially precipitous plunge during the Obama administration’s so-called “sequestration” budget pogroms. Barack Obama insisted that national security be placed on the same level as prison work-release programs, food stamps, and other Democrat “pet rocks” — every dollar cut from a “social” good had to be matched with a dollar cut from national defense. Thus, defense suffer asymmetrically deep cuts. Of course, the NDSC cited lack of funding as a primary culprit to the current crisis — but it wasn’t the only one.
|