nChrist
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2018, 06:29:30 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post - Alexander's Column 6-13-2018 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
As our analyst Thomas Gallatin noted yesterday in “Trump’s Real NoKo Strategy24,” his objective was to cautiously lay the groundwork for North Korean denuclearization with the full understanding that Kim has a history of not keeping his commitments. In effect, the summit was a deal to make a deal to disarm the most unstable and dangerous Pacific threat.
The agreement25 signed by Trump and Kim established four goals:
The United States and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) commit to establish new US-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.
There will be additional negotiations to determine the length of the agreement and how to enforce the United Nations resolution and U.S. position calling for the “complete, verifiable, irreversible, dismantlement” of North Korea’s nukes. To be determined will be how to lift sanctions and restore human rights, how many U.S. troops will remain on the peninsula, and, in all of this, China’s role.
There will also be contingencies based on backroom negotiations with China’s dictator Xi Jinping, who is reluctant to give up his NoKo nuke card, but Kim’s tyrannical regime is “seeing the light,” given the gross disparity between the economic standing of his country and that of South Korea.
Clearly, geopolitical negotiations are multifarious, with a myriad of moving parts.
However, most media outlets, Left and Right, don’t have the analytical intellect to assess, much less report, that Trump is a chess master when it comes to positioning our pieces against those of our opponents, whether it is a matter of trade or national security. He is playing a strategic match, while the media reports on each move as if it is a checkers game. I suppose that if Leftmedia journalists reported on strategy instead of tactics, it would significantly curtail their endless churn of every move in order to enhance their advertising revenues.
Of course, geopolitical negotiations are more complex than chess, and not as clean as a chess board because one player can make multiple moves before his opponent, with 10 other players advising those moves.
Furthermore, the contrast between the MSM’s reporting about Trump’s negotiations with Iran and NoKo versus Obama’s failed negotiations on both counts is stark, betraying the Leftmedia’s gross bias. Obama, who was bestowed with a Nobel Peace Prize26 just eight months into his first term for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” was uniformly hailed by the MSM as a great negotiator.
Conversely, Trump’s Iran and NoKo strategies have been defamed as a failure.
But to be clear, since Trump put Kim on notice months ago, there have been no nuclear tests, no missiles fired over Japan, no more threats against Guam and Hawaii, and Kim has shuttered his primary nuclear test site (verification pending) and released U.S. hostages.
Unfortunately, Obama’s policies were based, by his own account, on this principle: “Don’t do stupid s—t,” which, ironically, is all he did. His policy of “Strategic Patience27” with NoKo led to Kim’s rise as a nuclear power.
These negotiations are tenuous, but one thing is indisputable — unless your anti-Trump blinders are superglued to your opinion filter: Trump is a very good negotiator, whereas over the last three decades most of the negotiating has been left primarily to inept career State Department bureaucrats.
To that end, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) protested what she claimed was the president’s “marginalization of the vast expertise of the State Department.” She concluded that Trump is “hindering a lasting, stable pathway to peace.”
But Trump’s policies with China, Iran and NoKo are based on the same principle held by most American presidents prior to Obama: America First. But unlike every previous president, Trump is roundly maligned for that position.
Leading the chorus of the most malignant maligning was Obama’s incompetent former CIA director John Brennan28, who conspired with James Comey29 to launch the bogus Trump/Russia collusion investigation30. Just before Trump departed for the Singapore negotiations, Brennan issued this outrageous statement: “[Trump’s] wrong-headed protectionist policies & antics are damaging our global standing as well as our national interests. [Trump’s] worldview does not represent American ideals. To allies & friends: Be patient, Mr. Trump is a temporary aberration. The America you once knew will return.”
Brennan, Comey, Clinton and Obama are all desperately endeavoring to salvage whatever legacy they can before being tossed onto the trash heap of history. They all assumed their legacy was secure with the certain election of Clinton.
Good luck with that.
And a footnote: Tomorrow, June 14th, is the anniversary of the 1777 resolution by the Second Continental Congress adopting the American flag, celebrated as “Flag Day31.” On Flag Day, 1946, Donald Trump was born. That should make a few snowflake heads explode!
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776
|