nChrist
|
 |
« on: January 02, 2018, 04:05:54 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 1-2-2018 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Jan. 2, 2018 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/53185
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Trump endured mercilessly negative news coverage last year surprisingly well. Looking back at fake gun news in 2017, beware of more of the same this year. Iranians are protesting tyranny and Trump is offering needed support. New Year’s resolutions are worthless without resolve. Law and order made significant advances in 2017. Debunking the whole fiction of the proverbial “dreamer.” Plus our Daily Features: Top Headlines, Memes, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“Newspapers … serve as chimnies to carry off noxious vapors and smoke.” —Thomas Jefferson (1802)
IN BRIEF
Trump Exposes Significant MSM Bias in First Year1
By Thomas Gallatin
President Donald Trump noted an interesting thing last week — that his approval ratings match Barack Obama’s at the end of his first year in office. Trump tweeted, “While the Fake News loves to talk about my so-called low approval ratings, @foxandfriends just showed that my rating on Dec. 28, 2017, was approximately the same as President Obama on Dec. 28, 2009, which was 47% … and this despite massive negative Trump coverage & Russia hoax!” And like Pavlov’s dogs, the Demo/MSM rabidly reacted to Trump’s tweet, once again serving only to further prove his observation of their Trump Derangement Syndrome.
The Washington Post jumped to point out2 that Trump was relying on a Rasmussen poll which, according to the Post, “tends to skew more heavily Republican.” And while it may be accurate to note that various polling organizations produce differing results (this just in!), the fact of the matter is that politicians have a long history of highlighting favorable polls. The bigger factor the Post missed or ignored was that in the face of the overwhelming negative media coverage Trump endured during his first year in office, his favorability rating still matched that of Obama.
How overwhelmingly negative? The Pew Research Center found3 that MSM coverage of Trump was negative 62% of the time, while he received favorable coverage only 5% of the time. Compare that to Obama’s first year in office, when MSM coverage was 42% positive to only 20% negative. (Somehow we recall the positive coverage was far higher.) Meanwhile, both Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton experienced only 28% negative coverage in their first year.
Coming back to Trump’s favorability rating, imagine what his numbers might look like today if he had benefited from the same positive MSM coverage experienced by Obama. Instead, in 2018 Americans can expect to see only more of the same from the Demo/MSM, which will seek to convince the country that Trump is the worst thing that’s ever happened to America. That in turn will only sow more distrust of the MSM in the minds of many Americans.
Shooting Down Fake News About Guns4
By Nate Jackson
The New Year, as with every year, will require vigilance on the part of Liberty-lovers. In particular, we expect the Second Amendment will remain under assault by those who claim to love safety. Much of that assault comes from a dishonest Leftmedia propaganda machine dedicated to advancing Democrat policies of gun control. What better way to do that than to fill papers, airwaves, TV news and websites full of fake news meant to scare people? Courtesy5 of Emily Miller, author of Emily Gets Her Gun, here are a few such stories from 2017.
Some stories are spun from pure ignorance, which is, unfortunately, typical of those who would regulate firearms they know nothing about. Whether it’s New York’s Carolyn McCarthy spouting off about barrel shrouds6, or former Press Secretary Josh Earnest being unable to define7 an “assault weapon,” ignorance somehow becomes policy preference.
Hilariously, Miller recalls USA Today’s infamous list of accessories for AR-15s8. That list, published after the Texas church shooting9, included a “chainsaw bayonet,” which spawned a whole slew of parodies like our own10. Incredibly, USA Today’s article still has not been corrected.
But ignorance pales in comparison to deliberate deception. For example, many stories include no pro-Second Amendment view in counterpoint to leftist anti-gun rhetoric. In CNN’s report about the crazed socialist who attempted to murder Republicans11, the reporter saw fit only to interview (by email) the president of the anti-gun Brady Campaign. Likewise, NBC’s story about the fifth anniversary of Sandy Hook bemoaned that no new gun control laws had been passed since then — all because the Left failed to unite against the supposedly all-powerful NRA. There was no alternative point of view offered from the plethora of gun-rights groups that stand with the NRA, nor was there a mention of billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s12 deep-pocketed support for gun control.
Then there are lies, damned lies and statistics. Leftist reporters like CNN’s Jim Acosta have a bad habit of citing debunked data on mass shootings. According to Acosta, “Since Sandy Hook there have been at least 1,552 mass shootings, with at least 1,767 people killed and 6,227 wounded.” He got his information from the anti-gun “Gun Violence Archive” rather than actual FBI crime data or even the Congressional Research Service. Miller responds, “In fact, the number of people killed annually in mass shootings has been an average of 23 over the last 30 years.” That discrepancy is largely because of the definition of the term “mass shooting.” While anti-gun groups count all kinds of things to inflate that statistics, the FBI defines the term as on incident in which four or more people are killed outside the home.
As for the supposedly centrist Economist, its story about the Texas church shooting lamented that an AR-15 was used — a gun that “was prohibited in 1994, but legalised in 2004 when America’s assault-weapons ban expired.” Why did it expire? The article doesn’t say, but it’s because it was ineffective and unconstitutional. If The Economist had checked with the FBI, readers would know that of 11,004 gun homicides in 2016, just 374 were committed with rifles of any kind. They might also know the good guy NRA instructor in Texas used an AR-1513 to stop the massacre.
In short, as always, beware fake news about guns in 2018 as well.
Top Headlines14
GOP business tax cuts force other countries to compete (National Review15)
Democrats build cynical political case against tax bill but don’t call for repeal so as to keep it as a divisive campaign issue (The Washington Post16)
Nearly 450,000 people fled these three deep blue states In 2017 (The Daily Caller17)
Trump: “Time for change” in Iran; “The U.S. is watching” (CNS News18.)
How Islamic State’s caliphate crumbled (The Wall Street Journal19)
Haley: We cut almost $300 million from UN budget (Hot Air20)
Secret document reveals China covertly offering missiles, increased aid to North Korea (The Washington Free Beacon21)
Trump administration releases final 2017 report on incarcerated illegal immigrants (The Daily Signal22)
Five Colorado officers shot, one fatally, in “ambush-type” attack (Daily News23)
Baltimore breaks city record for killings per capita in 2017 (Associated Press24)
Appeals court rules bakers must pay $135,000 for not making wedding cake (The Daily Signal25)
Stock markets wrap up best year since 2013 (The Washington Post26)
Policy: What the U.S. should do as protests escalate in Iran (The Daily Signal27)
Policy: The Greatest Generation and the greatest illusion (City Journal28.)
For more of today’s news, visit Patriot Headline Report29.
FEATURED ANALYSIS Time to Stand With Iran’s People30
Protests in Iran continue on Tuesday as millions of ordinary Iranian men and woman stand up to a regime that is feared, hated and distrusted by the population. The spark for the latest nationwide protests was economic, but it ignited a combustible grievance that has been steadily building since at least the late 1990s — in truth since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
The vast majority of Iran’s 80 million people have no memory of the Revolution, and see only a brutal regime that enforces a medieval Islamic code of social mores while enriching itself and squandering the revenue provided by the world’s fourth-largest oil reserves. Highly educated and technically literate, young Iranians admire and, to the extent feasible, adopt many of the West’s cultural practices in music, television, dress and treatment of women. Yet they see their young Western counterparts enjoying higher employment numbers and freedom of expression, while young Iranians suffer a 40% unemployment rate and state-controlled speech. Very much like Soviet communism in the 1980s, the Islamic Revolution in Iran is old, tired and no longer able to inspire loyalty with its ideas, instead demanding loyalty with its guns.
|