nChrist
|
 |
« on: September 17, 2017, 04:31:20 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 9-14-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Sep. 14, 2017 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/51290
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Was there a DACA deal or not? Trump and Dems send mixed signals. Another look at the Benghazi failures we can pin on Hillary Clinton. America is growing more secular, and that could have implications for Liberty. Daily Features: Top Headlines, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“The policy or advantage of [immigration] taking place in a body (I mean the settling of them in a body) may be much questioned; for, by so doing, they retain the Language, habits and principles (good or bad) which they bring with them. Whereas by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures and laws: in a word, soon become one people.” —George Washington (1794)
IN BRIEF
Mixed Messages on the Demo/Trump DACA Deal1
Donald Trump tweeted early Thursday morning before heading down to Florida, “No deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military?” He followed that tweet by re-emphasizing his commitment to building the border wall, tweeting, “The WALL, which is already under construction in the form of new renovation of old and existing fences and walls, will continue to be built.”
Trump’s tweet seemed to contradict what Democrat leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi said following their dinner meeting with Trump on Wednesday. “[We had] a very productive meeting at the White House with the President,” the pair said in a statement. “The discussion focused on DACA. We agreed to enshrine the protections of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides.”
Following Trump’s Thursday tweets, Schumer and Pelosi released another joint statement saying that Trump’s message was “not inconsistent with the agreement reached last night.” After all, Trump also said, “The wall will come later,” so who knows.
So, was a deal reached? It seems the deal reached was a decision to work together toward developing legislation on DACA2 and bolstering border security. What that legislation would look like is still up in the air.
There are a couple of things to keep in mind as the wheeling and dealing happens. All so-called “Dreamers” were not innocent five-year-olds brought to America by their parents. Democrats love to use broad brush strokes in painting an overly simplistic portrait of these Dreamers with the goal of including as many illegal aliens as possible in this protected class. In so doing they aim to build their future constituency, while branding themselves as the only party that really cares for the underprivileged.
As for Trump’s wall, it needs to be understood more as a metaphor for border security and immigration enforcement rather than a literal unbroken wall running east to west across the southern border. In any case, the haggling is only getting started and both sides are angling for the best political posture.
Insiders Confirm State Dept’s Benghazi Cover-up3
Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions (TAES) security contractors Brad Owens and Jerry Torres (company CEO) told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson of their dealings with Hillary Clinton’s State Department both before and after the deadly 2012 Benghazi attack. By these two men’s account, safety protocols were botched from the get-go. Moreover, Fox News reports4, “Asked if there was a specific effort by a senior State Department contracting officer to silence them, Torres said, ‘Absolutely, absolutely.’”
Some background: In 2012, TAES was among the groups vying for the State Department’s security contract in Benghazi, but the contract was initially given to The Blue Mountain Group due to its more appealing operating costs. According to Owens, “Blue Mountain U.K. is a teeny, tiny, little security company registered in Wales that had never had a diplomatic security contract, had never done any high threat contracts anywhere else in the world that we’ve been able to find, much less in high threat areas for the U.S. government. They had a few guys on the ground.” Moreover, Fox News reports, “The Blue Mountain Group hired guards through another company who were not armed.” What could possibly go wrong?
It didn’t take long to figure out. The terrorist threats escalated shortly thereafter. The State Department was warned by Ambassador Chris Stevens that the compound lacked the resources needed to fend off a coordinated attack, and in late August 2012, the State Department came back to TAES requesting its security services. Unfortunately, by then it was too late. According to Fox, “Torres emphasized that time was against them, saying it would have taken two-to-three weeks to get set up. Twelve days later, the ambassador was killed. Torres learned of the attacks by watching television. He called the circumstances leading up to the tragedy ‘bad decision-making from top to bottom.’”
Subsequently, Torres says he was ordered by a State Department official to “not speak to the media” and “not speak to any officials with respect to the Benghazi program.” Torres added that this official stated, “Guards should not be armed at U.S. embassies. She just made that blanket statement. … And she said that they weren’t required in Benghazi. So I was kind of confused about that. And she said that she would like my support in saying that if that came up. And I looked at her. I just didn’t respond.”
This is yet more demonstrable proof that the Obama administration was more than just callous. It was resolutely deceptive about Benghazi. This was always a cover-up ahead of the 2012 election and, from our perspective, it was the biggest factor of Barack Obama’s re-election. Now a couple of insiders are confirming the State Department’s gag order. Yet you won’t hear Hillary Clinton blaming the Benghazi debacle for last year’s electoral loss.
Top Headlines5
Obama holdovers are slowing Trump’s agenda in key agencies (Washington Examiner6)
August sees record gun sales (The Washington Free Beacon7)
ICE: 14,000 detained illegal aliens getting free health care at 21 facilities in 10 states (CNS News8.)
Trump blocks Chinese deal to buy U.S. chips with military uses (The Washington Times9)
One-star reviews of Hillary Clinton’s “What Happened” disappear on Amazon (The Washington Times10)
Last-chance ObamaCare repeal bill includes waivers from insurance regulations (Washington Examiner11)
North Korea nuclear test may have been twice as strong as first thought (The Washington Post12)
Hurricane Irma’s wrath will mean higher grocery bills (USA Today13)
Stunning testimony: Voting machines can be hacked without a trace of evidence (The Washington Times14)
Facebook to clamp down on who can cash in on ads (Reuters15)
Policy: Kim Jong Un must go. It’s time for a Korean democratic unification. (The Weekly Standard16)
Policy: How Congress can restore fiscal sanity. (The Daily Signal17)
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report18. Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column
Read China’s Nuclear Puppet Gambit — Kim Jong-un19. The Kim/NoKo nuke threat is a subterfuge to contain Trump’s threatened trade sanctions against China.
If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email, update your subscription here20.
FEATURED ANALYSIS Americans Are More Secular — What That Means for Liberty21
By Thomas Gallatin
Are Americans becoming less religious, or, more specifically, are we becoming less Christian? The answer seems to be yes. As we approach Constitution Day this Sunday, this new reality has implications for American Liberty.
According to data from a new survey22 released last week by the Public Religion Research Institute, a study of more than 100,000 Americans across the nation found that the number of those who call themselves “religious and spiritual” has declined from 59% in 2012 to 48%. Currently, just 43% of white Americans claim to be Christians and only 30% Protestants. In 1976, the numbers were 81% Christian with 55% Protestant. That’s clearly a significant drop in one generation.
PRRI found that the decline in religious observance among Americans is highest in young Americans. The non-religious or “nones” now make up 34% of all Americans under the age of 30. And young Americans who are religious and identify as Christians are a shrinking percentage. Interestingly, among religiously unaffiliated Americans, a minority (only 27%) claim to be either agnostic or atheist. It’s interesting that most Americans who identify as secular and non-religious aren’t willing to entirely reject religious beliefs.
|