nChrist
|
 |
« on: September 01, 2017, 03:41:51 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 9-1-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Sep. 1, 2017 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/51063
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Leftists are scandalized that conservatives Christians believe what the Bible teaches. The fix was in — James Comey decided early on not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. Hurricane Harvey is going to cost a lot of money, and some of it was avoidable. Daily Features: Top Headlines, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. With such persons, gullibility, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck.” —Thomas Jefferson (1822)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Christians Sign Statement of Christian Faith, Left Goes Nuts1
Christians aren’t supposed to believe what the Bible teaches; Christians are instead supposed to believe what 21st century social justice warriors allow them to believe. That’s essentially the message of progressives in the wake of the signing by many prominent Evangelical Christians of the Nashville Statement2.
National Review’s David French, who was among the signers, sums it up3: “It’s a basic declaration of Christian orthodoxy on sexuality, sexual orientation, and sexual identity. Its 14 articles can be boiled down to a simple statement: We believe the Bible is the word of God, and the word of God declares that sexual intimacy is reserved for the lifelong union of a man and a woman in marriage. It acknowledges the reality of same-sex attraction as well as the reality of transgender self-conceptions, but denies that God sanctions same-sex sexual activity or a transgendered self-conception that is at odds with biological reality. In other words, it’s basic Christianity.”
Naturally, that’s vile bigotry to many on the Left. In addition to the leftist Christians whose politics often trump their belief in the Bible’s teachings, Nashville’s Democrat Mayor Megan Barry weighed in, tweeting, “The @CBMWorg’s so-called ‘Nashville Statement’ is poorly named and does not represent the inclusive values of the city & people of Nashville.” But given the large conservative Evangelical presence in Nashville, we’d say that the statement is in fact a fair and accurate representation.
But as French notes, Barry’s proclamation, as representative of Nashville’s government, is “a declaration of state against church.” It’s the mayor telling many of her own citizens that they do not represent their city. This line of totalitarian thinking is exactly what drove the Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage, among other things. Americans are being told what to think by the Rainbow Mafia and its Big Media enablers. Or should we say feel? Because that’s what this is — emotion-driven, “love wins” policymaking that subjects those who disagree to disdain, mockery and even criminal penalty. Is that the kind of religious liberty the Pilgrims came here to establish?
Comey Had Hillary’s Back the Whole Time4
Well, well, well, it looks like James Comey5 decided to let Hillary Clinton off the hook for her home-brew server months before the FBI had concluded its investigation. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday revealed in a letter sent to current FBI Director Christopher Wray: “According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton. That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts. Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.” The letter was signed by Republican Senators Chuck Grassely and Lindsey Graham.
As we long suspected, the fix was in before the investigation even got rolling. Continuing the investigation for months merely served to provide the façade of a non-biased effort. Meanwhile, on Tuesday, the FBI rejected an open-records request by lawyer Ty Clevenger on the Clinton investigation, stating, “You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal interests of the subject.” This response from the FBI is flat-out ridiculous. One of the biggest stories of last year is not in the public’s interest? Please.
In a related story, on Thursday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the FBI to disclose the details on how it handled its investigation into Clinton. Boasberg stated, “After reviewing the document in camera, the court concludes that it largely rehashes information already made public, thus obviating any need for secrecy.” Slowly but surely the truth behind what all went on in the FBI’s investigation into Hillary’s server-gate is finally coming to light.
Top Headlines6
A photo essay of Americans helping each other — this is who we really are. (The Daily Signal7)
U.S. adds 156,000 jobs in August; unemployment 4.4%. (MarketWatch8.)
There is new fundraising fodder at the Southern Poverty Law Center9 — 1,503 “Confederate place names” now being targeted. (CNS News10)
More than 70% of voters want lower taxes … no shocker here! (The Washington Free Beacon11)
Trump administration retaliates against Russia, forces closure of U.S. posts. (Fox News12)
How the administration is “draining the swamp” at the State Department. (The Daily Signal13)
Trump rolls back Obama’s costly and onerous diversity regulations. (The Washington Free Beacon14)
Settled science? Yet another comprehensive study casting doubt on conventional wisdom about fat and carbs. (PBS15)
Cornell encourages students to report peers for “negative reactions” to LGBT “Safe Place” project. (Washington Examiner16)
Fraternity and sorority retreat canceled after banana peel found in tree — seriously, this happened. (Campus Reform17)
Policy: Trump’s reversal of Obama pay gap rule is good news for women, minorities. (The Daily Signal18.)
Policy: The cost of inaction on tax reform. (American Action Forum19]
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report20.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS A Costly Hurricane21
By Brian Mark Weber
There’s nothing more heartwarming than seeing strangers risking their lives to help their neighbors22 and fellow citizens after a natural disaster. It’s one of those rare moments when people put aside whatever differences they may have for the greater good. But now that Hurricane Harvey’s floodwaters are receding, it’s time to start focusing on the recovery efforts and their associated costs. And the costs are tremendous.
The Houston Business Journal reports23, “Moody’s Analytics24, a New York-based financial analysis company, has pegged the destruction to southeast Texas, which includes the Rockport area where Harvey made landfall, as of mid-morning Aug. 29 at about $75 billion, covering homes, vehicles, businesses, infrastructure and lost economic output. Homes and vehicles alone in the region are expected to suffer about $30 billion to $40 billion in damage, according to an email from a Moody’s representative. Regional businesses could see up to $15 billion in damage.” Other estimates25 place the cost closer to $200 billion.
Natural disasters cannot be prevented, but their impacts can be reduced if cities like Houston would take the threat from these storms seriously and act proactively. Data26 from the National Weather Service show that Texas has been hit by 64 hurricanes and 56 tropical storms since the 1850s. So it’s not like Hurricane Harvey was an anomaly.
Worse, Ralph Vartabedian writes27 in the Los Angeles Times, “[Houston] has been deceiving itself for decades about its vulnerability to flooding, said Robert Bea, a member of the National Academy of Engineering and UC Berkeley emeritus civil engineering professor who has studied hurricane risks along the Gulf Coast. The city’s flood system is supposed to protect the public from a 100-year storm” that is “based on a rainfall total of 13 inches in 24 hours.”
Clearly, the system wasn’t designed to protect Houston from a storm the size of Harvey. Had various levels of government directed resources into Houston’s infrastructure, the costs incurred would have certainly been less than those the city is now facing. Another way the costs of these powerful storms can be reduced is to fix the flawed and bankrupt National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Government programs always sound good, but there’s always more to the story.
The editors of Investor’s Business Daily write28, “[NFIP] owes close to $25 billion to the U.S. Treasury, which means it owes you, the taxpayer. How could that be? The fact is, as with so many government programs, the very name of the agency is false. It is not providing ‘insurance’ in any true sense, but rather a taxpayer guarantee. Big difference.”
|