nChrist
|
 |
« on: January 23, 2017, 04:01:06 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 1-23-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Jan. 23, 2017
IN TODAY’S EDITION
The women’s march on Saturday is hardly “the liberal tea party” in the making. Trump begins the process of repealing ObamaCare. Federal government cuts are on the way — just how much remains a question. And more news, policy and opinion.
THE FOUNDATION
“It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution.” —Thomas Jefferson (1781)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Raucous Leftist Women Pitch a Fit1
Our new favorite satire website, The Babylon Bee, headlined the weekend’s women’s march more appropriately than any (ahem) real news outlet did: “March Defends Women’s Right To Choose Conformity With Only One Political Viewpoint2.” Of course, we noted a similar theme last week — that Some Women Are More Equal Than Others3. So you get the point: Saturday’s march wasn’t about empowering all women, but rather about a bunch of aggrieved leftist loudmouths with nothing productive to do on a Saturday.
The march wasn’t confined to Washington either, but spread to cities around the world. Marches in the U.S. had a distinctly anti-Trump flavor, helped by the timing one day after the inauguration. Some estimated that more than one million people marched in Washington, with millions more in other cities. If you ventured onto social media this weekend, though, you already knew this, thanks to your obnoxious relatives and friends reveling in “speaking truth to power” or whatever.
But how did women speak this truth and demand due respect? With posters about their body parts or sexual proclivities that are far too vulgar to reprint or even paraphrase in this family publication. And they did it with speeches from Hollywood celebrities — symbols of the rich, famous and powerful. Actress Ashley Judd boasted, “I’m a nasty woman — a loud, vulgar, proud woman.” She elaborated on why, but we’ll leave that detail for her unfortunate audience. She also warned of “Hitler in these streets” (meaning Trump and his supporters) and other explicit Nazi references. Don’t leftists ever tire of comparing normal American conservatives to Nazi socialists? Maybe it’s because the comparison makes no sense whatsoever that they continue to make it.
Madonna, another poor, persecuted celebrity, declared that she had “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.” How such terrorism advances the interest of women was left unsaid.
Sympathetic media coverage could propel this ragtag band to movement status and make it a factor in 2018. The Washington Post thinks4 “the liberal tea party movement has begun.” But whereas the Tea Party was unified around standing for Liberty and Rule of Law and opposing the unconstitutional abuses of the Obama administration, these women (and men) who marched weren’t there to advance any particular cohesive idea. No, they were largely there to pitch a collective fit.
Trump Begins the Repeal of ObamaCare5
One of Donald Trump’s first acts as president was to make good on one of his biggest campaign promises: the repeal of ObamaCare. On Friday, Trump signed executive orders directing Health and Human Services and other federal agencies to “exercise all authority and discretion available to them to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products or medications.”
One may question whether Trump has the power to issue this directive. The short answer is yes, due to way the law was written and implemented, giving the HHS secretary broad authority in deciding on application of the law and in the granting of waivers. Recall how Barack Obama early on slowed implementing some of the more controversial aspects of ObamaCare in order to establish the more favorable aspects of the law before the general public experienced the negative aspects. It was a shrewd political move by the Democrats at the time, but now those “chickens have come home to roost.”
Trump directed an attacked on the very core of ObamaCare — the most objectionable and offensive part of the entire law — the individual mandate. Does this mean that overnight every American is exempt? No, the law with its individual mandate is still in effect. What Trump has done is largely symbolic, with one major caveat — the contraception mandate. The law was not specific on this issue, which allowed Obama to run roughshod in forcing his leftist views onto the American public, precipitating a slew of lawsuits currently working their way through the courts. Trump could rescind the mandate immediately, but it might behoove him to allow the courts to determine the legality of the mandate in hopes of ruling it unconstitutional, thereby preventing future attempts at a mandate.
Trump’s actions on Friday by no means end ObamaCare, but he took a good first step, and effectively paved the way for Republicans in Congress to act quickly.
Top Headlines6
Trump’s nominees face “unprecedented” Democrat obstructionism. (The Daily Signal7)
Gen. James Mattis, Gen. John Kelly confirmed for Trump Cabinet spots. (Fox News8.)
Manpower shortage threatens Donald Trump’s hopes to rebuild military. (The Washington Times9)
Obama was first president to spend more on welfare than defense. (CNS News10)
Obama administration spent billions on failing schools, achieved nothing. (Hot Air11)
Obama’s biggest whoppers — some of them anyway, considering the source… (The Washington Post12) Yes, the Post discovered Obama lied.
Trump at the CIA — he “couldn’t resist turning the event into an extended and self-centered riff” about crowd size and dishonest media. (The Wall Street Journal13)
Trump greets Comey: “He’s become more famous than me.” (The Hill14)
Trump definitively forsakes his promise to release his tax returns. (Reason15)
Supreme Court won’t rescue Texas voter ID law. (USA Today16)
Policy: Should we want a bipartisan FCC? (Tech Policy Daily17)
Policy: Fixing health care the free-market way. (Washington Examiner18.)
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS America First — Trump’s Inaugural Address19
By Nate Jackson
“America First” pretty much sums up the message from Donald Trump’s inaugural address20. The speech was a profoundly bold and brash populist manifesto, and it was quintessential Trump. National Review’s Rich Lowry called it21 a “slightly more subdued version of his stump speech.” Trump lauded our country and promised, of course, to make it great again. He also set the bar high with promises, and many Americans are eager to see what he’ll do as the 45th president of the United States.
Trump began with confidence and promise. “We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore its promise for all of our people,” he said. “Together, we will determine the course of America and the world for years to come. We will face challenges. We will confront hardships. But we will get the job done.”
“We.” That word showed up nearly 50 times in the speech, while “I” appeared just three times. That’s a change from Barack Obama’s self-centered speeches.
Then he set about painting a picture of the damage done to our great nation by eight years of Barack Obama22. And that began with a pointed rebuke of his predecessor sitting just behind him.
|