nChrist
|
 |
« on: November 07, 2016, 03:38:08 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 11-7-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Nov. 7, 2016
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Comey says, once again, there’s nothing to see here. What’s the real agenda? Voter disenfranchisement, Democrat style — illegals and felons. Debunking Hillary Clinton’s “toughness” with Russia. Rolling Stone gets its comeuppance after defaming UVA dean. And more news, policy and opinion.
THE FOUNDATION
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt.” —Samuel Adams (1749)
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Comey’s Layup for Clinton1
By Mark Alexander
Over the weekend, Democrats and Republicans retreated to their initial assessments of FBI Director James Comey after he retreated to his initial exoneration of Hillary Clinton2 three months ago.
However, in my analysis 10 days ago3 regarding Comey’s “reopened investigation” into Hillary Clinton4, I emphasized this caveat: It was possible this was an eleventh hour play for Comey to exonerate Clinton — again. I based this assessment on Barack Obama’s highly suspect praise of Comey right after the re-opened case announcement.
Then, I wrote that Obama’s affirmation of Comey could mean he already knows that Comey will announce, by the end of the week, that the FBI has completed a preliminary review of the new emails and that Comey will, again, clear Clinton of any wrongdoing.
Indeed, Comey did just that in a follow-up letter to Congress Sunday: “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton. I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short-period of time.” (Apparently, his investigators were able to read 650,000 emails in seven days — that’s 92,857 a day…)
So, what to conclude about this latest political charade? Either Comey is profoundly inept, or his “case re-opened” notification to Congress was a lay-up for Clinton’s campaign — to raise her corrupt off-grid communications5 again just so he could exonerate her again right before the election.
And that leaves us right where we started regarding the Clintons' criminal enterprises6, as I noted last Friday.
Our nation has survived two World Wars and a catastrophic Great Depression. Can our country survive the abject corruption of another Clinton administration in the wake and ruins of two Obama terms — and the appointment of Supreme Court justices who will shred our Constitution?
The nation will survive but the Republic, and its foundation of Liberty7 as affirmed in our Constitution, is on the eve of suffering the most significant insult in American history.
The only way to avoid nationalizing the Clinton’s crime syndicate8 is to defeat Hillary Clinton9 at the polls.
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Disenfranchisement, Democrat Style10
In an interview with actress Gina Rodriguez, Barack Obama was asked the following question: “Many of the Millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration [officials] know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?” Obama replied, “Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself and there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, etc. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.” Did Obama just declare that it was ok for illegal immigrants to vote? It seems so, though it’s not case closed because he went on to say illegals are “counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard.” His deliberately ambiguous words are alarming given all that Obama has done to eviscerate Rule of Law on the immigration front.
Meanwhile in Virginia, it was recently learned that Democrat Gov. Terry McAuliffe has successfully granted 60,000 ex-convicts voting rights in time for voting in the election, helping tip the state in favor of his long-time friend Hillary Clinton. It had been initially reported by his office that he was able to review and sign only 13,000 approvals after the state courts overruled his attempted illegal blanket pardon11 of more than 200,000 ex-convicts. In fact, those pardoned felons received voter registration forms with a letter from McAuliffe with pre-paid return postage.
It’s clear that Democrats have little problem with the legality of voters, so long as those voters support their candidates. What’s ironic is just how much Democrats wail about voter disenfranchisement, all while disenfranchising citizens with their continued efforts to get votes from illegal immigrants and felons. Is it any wonder that many Americans believe Donald Trump when he talks about the election being rigged?
Clinton’s Russian Weakness12
The Washington Post has been completely in the tank for Hillary Clinton this year. The latest story is no different — attempting to paint Clinton as a tough opponent of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, which is supposedly the “real” reason he’s opposed to her candidacy. Aside from her infamous “reset,” the Post specifically referenced her as telling Barack Obama that “strength and resolve were the only language Putin would understand.” The problem is that Clinton and Obama have been anything but tough with Putin. According the Post, Hillary’s idea of being tough with Putin is to “snub him” and avoid “flatter[ing] Putin with high-level attention.” In other words, get on your high horse and act like he doesn’t exist. While that type of passive-aggressive behavior might work for one who is seeking to show dominance over weak-minded subordinates, it tends to have the opposite effect on those who are of a discerning mind and see through the power play charade.
Since Obama has been in office, America has witnessed the rise of Russian strength and a rebirth of Cold War-like animosities between the U.S. and Russia. Mitt Romney warned about just that, while Obama and Clinton scoffed. Putin has successfully annexed Crimea, occupied eastern Ukraine, and propped up a once-faltering Bashar al-Assad, essentially securing his hold on power in Syria. Obama and company have issued ultimatums and endorsed sanctions that they have then failed to back up, which is no sign of strength but of weakness. Ignoring problems doesn’t make them go away, and talking tough while ignoring problems only makes one look even more foolish.
|