nChrist
|
 |
« on: October 04, 2016, 07:38:08 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 9-30-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Sep. 30, 2016
THE FOUNDATION
“Every man who loves peace, every man who loves his country, every man who loves liberty ought to have it ever before his eyes that he may cherish in his heart a due attachment to the union of America and be able to set a due value on the means of preserving it.” —James Madison (1788.)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
U.S. Welcomes Undocumented Refugees1
When it comes to the Obama administration’s refugee program, America’s borders are basically wide open. We begin with an excerpt from The Washington Times, which notes: “Leon Rodriguez, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said a ‘significant’ number of refugees have been implicated in terrorist plots over the past eight years but that the rejection of some 7 percent of Syrian applications proves his officers can spot danger signs.”
That assertion is not only contradictory, it’s downright deceitful. Here’s what Rodriguez told the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday: “There are cases where [a refugee applicant’s] testimony is not necessarily corroborated by documents.” He added, “I am acknowledging that, yes, testimony can be the basis for the grant of a refugee but it needs to be tested against other information that we know — about the country conditions, at a minimum.”
Rodriguez’s claim that refugees are adequately vetted was further undermined when he strongly rebuked a newly uncovered DHS memo2 that warns, “Refugee fraud is easy to commit, yet not easy to investigate.” Yet Rodriguez’s own words only affirm there are national security-impairing vulnerabilities present in the vetting process.
His testimony also supports what FBI Director James Comey revealed last October: “If someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but … nothing [will] show up because we have no record of them.”
There’s no question terrorists are exploiting the system. Yet the White House website says3, “Refugees undergo more rigorous screening than anyone else we allow into the United States.” If that’s true, the administration is setting a dangerously low bar.
HHS Robs Taxpayers for Illegal ObamaCare Bailout4
How bad is ObamaCare? Six years after its passage, it may cost Democrats the Senate5. Nearly every bit of news about the law is bad — skyrocketing premiums, co-ops closing, insurers abandoning the exchanges, millions paying the penalty rather than buying coverage. And now the latest. A program called “transitional insurance” collected fees from private insurance plans to redistribute to insurance companies to cover for more expensive enrollees. (It’s similar to but separate from “risk corridors.”) But because ObamaCare has pretty well blown through all cost estimates, the amount collected wasn’t enough. Naturally, the way Barack Obama’s administration handled that runs afoul of the law, because the Department of Health and Human Services did not allocate the required funds to the U.S. Treasury (i.e. taxpayers) before bailing out insurers. In fact, rather than make any payments to the Treasury, it sat on some extra money.
According to a new GAO report6, “When total collections for benefit year 2014 — $9.7 billion — fell short of the target amount for reinsurance payments, HHS did not allocate any collections to the Treasury or to administrative expenses. Because the agency collected less than the $10 billion target for reinsurance payments, it allocated all of its collections for those payments. The agency received $7.9 billion in reinsurance claims and paid these in full, leaving approximately $1.7 billion in collections, which it carried over for reinsurance payments in subsequent benefit years. As a result, HHS did not deposit any amounts collected from issuers into the Treasury.” GAO says HHS doesn’t have that authority. All told, Obama took $3 billion in taxpayer money and gave it to private insurers instead — all because ObamaCare is such a destructive law.
The risk corridor program is facing similar trouble, and Obama is looking to — what else — circumvent Congress and the law to fix it. There’s not enough money allocated for this bailout either, so Obama’s considering a plan to raid funds set aside for federal legal settlements. That would be deceitful and probably illegal, but what else is new for this unconstitutional abomination of a “law”?
Obama’s Coal Power Play7
Caught between the increase of competition from natural gas on one side and Barack Obama’s stifling regulations and Hillary Clinton admitting that her energy plan would effectively put the coal industry out of business8 on the other, it would appear that the American coal industry is not long for this world. As a result of the coal industry’s steady demise, concern over funding coal workers' pensions has become a very real issue. For every current coal worker, there are now 10 retirees whose pension plans are in jeopardy.
As The Wall Street Journal reports, “Benefits are underfunded by $5.6 billion, or about $600,000 per worker, and the pension plan is projected to go broke by 2025. A retiree who worked 30 years would then receive a maximum of $12,870 per year from the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) versus $24,250.” Now the unions representing the coal workers want taxpayers to underwrite these pensions. Essentially, the unions are seeking a government bailout for an industry the government had a major hand in destroying. And Hillary Clinton would gladly oblige.
Leftists like Hillary Clinton who see the government as “savior” eagerly leap to supply solutions to problems which all too often resulted from their own prior “solutions.” Creating more not less dependence on the government is the goal of socialists. Democrats have lost support in what was once staunchly Democrat coal country, and this is an opportunity to win back support. Similar to the auto industry bailouts, a coal pension bailout could go a long way in bringing disillusioned Democrats back into the fold. Of course, legislation of this type would “add significant new costs, and eliminate savings sought by the administration,” a top official at the Department of Interior warned in 2010. But if killing coal can be leveraged into a Democrat power play to save coal workers' pensions, then it’s a win, even as coal workers and taxpayers lose.
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
Charles Krauthammer: When Facts, Logic and History Don’t Matter9 Rich Lowry: The Media Freakout10 David Harsanyi: Why Didn’t the FBI Give Hillary Clinton Immunity and Spare Us the Drama?11
For more, visit Right Opinion12.
TOP HEADLINES
The Clintons' Big Fat Greek Bond Wedding13 Obama Tried Punishing Judicial Watch14 Authorities Tried Deporting Black Man Shot by Cops in California15 New Jersey Student Suspended for Anti-Gun Control Project16
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report17.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS ‘Equal Pay’: Another Area for Government Meddling18
By Michael Swartz
As the presidential campaign has dragged on, it’s become more clear that Hillary Clinton is simply offering to extend the utter failure of Barack Obama’s administration. Whether coincidental or not, days after Hillary opened her debate with Donald Trump by pledging to “guarantee, finally, equal pay for women’s work,” the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced19 it would begin collecting data from businesses on that very subject in March 2018. Never mind the facts about the supposed pay gap20 when there’s regulation to be had.
In its announcement, the EEOC fired a warning shot across the bow of those businesses required to file, noting, “The new data will improve investigations of possible pay discrimination, which remains a contributing factor to persistent wage gaps.” EEOC Chair Jenny Yang echoed this, adding, “Collecting pay data is a significant step forward in addressing discriminatory pay practices.” This new policy will affect the thousands of businesses that have 100 or more employees as well as federal contractors and subcontractors that employ 50 or more.
|