nChrist
|
 |
« on: May 05, 2016, 06:27:50 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 5-5-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
May 5, 2016
THE FOUNDATION
“The establishment of civil and religious liberty was the motive which induced me to the field — the object is attained — and it now remains to be my earnest wish and prayer, that the citizens of the United States could make a wise and virtuous use of the blessings placed before them.” —George Washington (1783)
NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER
Today is the National Day of Prayer1.
In 1775, on the eve of Revolution, the First Continental Congress called for “a day of publick humiliation, fasting, and prayer.” Indeed, our Founders saw a national day of prayer as a fitting observance.
In 1952, Congress established the National Day of Prayer as an annual event by a joint resolution, signed into law by President Harry Truman. The NDP designation (36 U.S.C. § 119) calls for the nation “to turn to God in prayer and meditation.”
Prayer is Almighty God’s prerequisite for true hope and change, and our nation needs an abundance of both right now. The Patriot Post’s National Advisory Board and staff invite you to join us, and millions of our countrymen, in prayer for our nation today at 12:00 local time.
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Guccifer and a Judge Hound Clinton Over Email Server2
Speaking to reporters from a Romanian prison cell, the hacker who goes by the name Guccifer claimed to have accessed Hillary Clinton’s private email server. “It was like an open orchid on the Internet,” said3 Guccifer, a.k.a Marcel Lehel Lazar. “There were hundreds of folders.” Lazar was recently extradited to the United States for breaking into the email accounts of notable Washington politicos such as Gen. Colin Powell and Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal4. If the hacker actually accessed the server stored in Clinton’s basement, he might have done so through Blumenthal’s email. The Clinton campaign, however, is vigorously denying the allegation. A statement declared5, “His descriptions of Secretary Clinton’s server are inaccurate,” adding that Guccifer never posted proof of the breach on the Internet. But the hacker — whom the FBI will question — claims he downloaded files upon files from the server that contained classified information. And are we really supposed to believe Clinton?
Not only is there mounting evidence that secrets were jeopardized because Clinton flippantly handled classified information, there’s a growing case that she violated the Freedom of Information Act. Yesterday, a federal judge said he might order Clinton to appear for disposition to explain why she wanted to operate an email account outside the control of the State Department. The judge wrote6 that the State Department “may have purposefully attempted to skirt disclosure under FOIA” by creating a private email server and the issue needs to be investigated. If both allegations prove true, then it means a Romanian hacker accessed some of the most sensitive of information just because Clinton wanted to avoid oversight. That’s a narrative that will destroy her leadership credibility and open the possibility for a Biden-Warren ticket7.
Another Insurance Company Mulls Exiting ObamaCare8
In its release of first-quarter financial reports9, Humana Inc announced it might leave some of the ObamaCare health care exchanges because it was losing too much money. Currently, the company, which is being sold to Aetna Inc, sells individual plans in 15 states. But the first quarter of 2016 was hard on the company because only 875,000 people signed up10 for its service, 150,000 fewer customers than a year ago, and profits dropped. Humana is the second insurer to mull leaving the ObamaCare exchanges. Last month, UnitedHealth announced11 it was pulling almost completely out of the system Obama built.
Part of the problem was that overly optimistic pro-ObamaCare advocates promised insurers the Americans going to the exchanges would be more numerous and healthier than they actually ended up being. Now, it’s another year and once again “health insurers struggle to offset new costs,” as The Wall Street Journal headlines12. Despite the law requiring that everyone purchase insurance, many companies will once again increase premiums by double-digit percentages to cover loses. Is any policymaker noticing that it’s the consumers who are struggling with the new costs? It’s proof the worst of ObamaCare’s troubles are in its future13.
A Year’s Worth of Taxes Wouldn’t Fund Federal Regs14
The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s 2016 edition of Ten Thousand Commandments15 was released this week, and it’s depressingly similar to last year’s study16. $1.885 trillion, or $15,000 per American household — that was the remarkably high cumulative financial burden of federal regulations in 2015. Moreover, says CEI, “114 laws were enacted by Congress during the calendar year, while 3,410 rules were issued by agencies. Thus, 30 rules were issued for every law enacted last year.”
“Many Americans complain about taxes, but regulatory compliance costs exceed the $1.82 trillion that the IRS is expected to collect in both individual and corporate income taxes from 2015,” the study notes. The Obama administration is averaging about 20 additional major regulations every year compared to Bush (81 vs. 62 annually).
However, a separate new Mercatus Center study, which, as we explained last week17, “analyzed data from 1977 through 2012 to discover the cumulative costs of regulations (or, more accurately, taxes by a different name)” by examining “data across 22 industries,” puts the economic cost of federal regulations at $4 trillion, good for the fourth-largest GDP in the world. “In plain English,” we wrote, “if regulations had remained steady at 1980 levels, our economy would have been 25% — or $4 trillion — larger in 2012 than it was.”
As Investor’s Business Daily observes18, “The problem is that these costs never show up in any federal budget as a cost of government. They just get hidden in higher prices, lower take home pay, more unemployment, less opportunity.” The best stimulus the government can give the economy is to tame the behemoth monster known as Regulation U.S.A.
Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column
Read The Biden-Warren Warning7, on the increasing likelihood that Donald Trump will not actually face Hillary Clinton.
If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email, update your subscription here19.
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
Cal Thomas: Socialism’s False Promise20 Victor Davis Hanson: Protestors Have Jumped the Shark21 George Will: The Misadventures of Fannie and Freddie22
For more, visit Right Opinion23.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Cruz Beat Himself24
By Allyne Caan
In a scenario largely unimaginable just nine months ago, Donald Trump, who has spent his life funding Democrats, is now the presumptive25 Republican presidential nominee. With Ted Cruz’s withdrawal from the race on Tuesday, the GOP — and conservatives across America — lost the only constitutionally conservative candidate left standing. While we did not endorse any particular candidate, clearly Cruz not only understood our Constitution but also thought it worth following and fighting for — imagine that.
So what happened?
When Cruz won Iowa, he looked poised to do well. When he won Wisconsin, it appeared as though he could really stop Trump. But his fall was precipitous.
The odds from the outset were not in Cruz’s favor, and, frankly, it’s a testament to his solid ground-game strategy that he made it as far as he did. Hardly beloved among the DC Republican elites, Cruz made a name for himself bucking the establishment26, which he regularly called “the Washington cartel.” Whether or not you cheered his “Green Eggs and Ham” filibuster protesting ObamaCare funding, it didn’t win him many friends among entrenched party leadership. As a result, not only former House Speaker John Boehner but actual conservatives in Washington were happy to sit on the sidelines and watch the Cruz campaign fail. Indeed, Boehner didn’t call Cruz27 “Lucifer in the flesh” as a term of endearment.
|