The Patriot Post Digest 3-14-2016

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Digest 3-14-2016
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Mid-Day Digest

Mar. 14, 2016

THE FOUNDATION

“I have not yet begun to fight!” —John Paul Jones (1779)

FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS
The ‘Eye for an Eye’ Election1

By Nate Jackson

Thanks Obama. The insanity of the 2016 election boils down to that phrase. Want to know why the GOP fielded one of the most impressive and accomplished presidential candidates in memory? Barack Obama. Want to know why that field was decimated by Donald Trump, as he became deeply popular with many Americans? Barack Obama. Want to know why political rallies now feature threats and violence? Barack Obama.

As Mark Alexander wrote last month2, “Seven years of Obama’s repressive regime has fomented despair, delusion and division among the ranks of Republican voters — so much so that some are willing to take leave of their senses and join a cultish movement with a self-promoting charlatan as its head. History is replete with examples of such movements, and the tragic result — the suppression of Liberty.”

The news that a Trump rally was canceled Friday night because of clashes between his supporters and protesters is a microcosm of the angst in the political arena. Trump’s rise is, again, due in part to the Left’s fascistic efforts to silence dissent, be it on climate change3, same-sex marriage4, or proposed gun confiscation5, just to name a few. All of that is part and parcel with vast expanse of government and abuse of power.

It’s to Trump’s credit that he canceled the Chicago rally. The leftist protesters clearly came ready for a fight, so things likely would have gotten even uglier, and more people would have been hurt. The blame for that lies squarely on the protesters planning their attack.

But it shouldn’t be surprising that Trump’s people are itching to punch someone in the face, too. (Some of them actually have.) Especially when Trump is saying things of protesters like this in Las Vegas: “I’d like to punch him in the face.” Or what he said in Missouri: “There used to be consequences to protesting. There are none anymore.” Or there’s this gem from an Iowa event: “So if you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of ‘em, would you? Seriously. Okay? Just knock the hell — I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise.”

People believe everything else he says. Why not the promise to back them up for punching a leftist’s lights out? Really, is it any wonder that Trump’s ace of anger affirmation6 would be followed at rallies by the jack of clubs?

Back to Obama, who has an authoritarian streak. Given his heated and petulant rhetoric over the years, he clearly views his opponents as evil and deserving of jail, exile or some other form of punishment. Often, the reaction to such authoritarianism is violence.

So it’s interesting that Trump is also an authoritarian. He advocates everything from loosening libel laws7 to the detriment of the First Amendment to violence to suppress dissent — in-kind retribution for the Left’s tactics. His campaign manager allegedly manhandled a reporter8 for a friendly publication. But the overarching point is that Trump says he can fix all of the ills of the Obama era by making “better deals” — i.e., using his great authoritarian power to make government great again.

People who put their faith in big government — whether Obama’s or Trump’s version — are probably more likely to resort to violence and other tactics of suppression.

All of this said, Americans have a history of rowdy political displays, so this recent escalation isn’t entirely new. Indeed, it’s a bit much for Friday’s news to have commentators looking for the nearest fainting couch. The original Boston Tea Party featured the destruction of private property. And the War for Independence began as a reaction to the British violently suppressing dissent — the colonists took up arms to stop them. This is a nation that split into two and fought a war over political disagreements. The 1968 election brought riots and two assassinations.

What is new, however, is a leading presidential candidate essentially turning an “eye for an eye” into a major plank of his platform. Will that fix what ails our nation?

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

    Caleb Verbois: Trump Isn’t the Problem, He’s the Symptom9
    Hans von Spakovsky: Attorney General Lynch Looks Into Prosecuting 'Climate Change Deniers’10
    Tony Perkins: Naming Names on Genocide11

For more, visit Right Opinion12.

TOP RIGHT HOOKS

Trump Gets One Delegate Saturday, Eyes Tuesday Wins13

The GOP primaries held Saturday were a pleasure cruise compared to the political waves that will come when the results from the five states that vote on Tuesday come rolling in. Wyoming, Guam and the District of Columbia decided their candidates14 and unlike the rest of the results so far, Ted Cruz took Wyoming with a comfortable 66.3% support among GOP voters and picked up a lone delegate from Guam. The most interesting result of the weekend, however, was the DC vote, as Donald Trump and Cruz came in a distant third and fourth, respectively. That further illustrates how Cruz and Trump are not the establishment15 candidates — or at least in Trump’s case not viewed that way.

But the more significant races will be the contests for Florida and Ohio Tuesday, where the winner will take all of the Sunshine State’s 99 delegates and The Mother of Presidents' 66. If Trump wins both, he will give John Kasich and Marco Rubio little excuse to stay in the race, and he would have amassed so many delegates that Cruz’s chances of becoming the nominee border on the impossible16.

Kasich leads17 in his home state at 37.8% support, with Trump coming in second with 31.8%. In an all-out effort to stop a Trump nomination, Rubio has told his Ohio supporters to cast their votes for Kasich. Trump is leading the Florida polls, but Kasich will not tell his Florida supporters to cast a strategic vote for Rubio in order to stop the real estate mogul. The polls18 have Trump pushing 40%, with Rubio struggling at 24%. Kasich’s 9% support could give Rubio a chance at preventing Trump from scooping up 99 delegates, but as Kasich said19, “I’m not into a stop Trump as much as I am be-for-Kasich movement.” And he calls himself “the prince of light and hope.”

How Close Is U.S. to Declaring ISIL’s Genocide?20

The pressure is on the Obama administration to label the Islamic State’s violence against Iraqi and Syrian Christians genocide. Per a congressional deadline, Secretary of State John Kerry is expected to announce a decision by March 17 about declaring the group guilty of wiping out groups based on their religions. It comes as 200 bipartisan lawmakers in the House backed a resolution declaring that the group has hunted members of not just Christianity, but of the Yazidi religion. Such a declaration would mean the U.S. would have legal obligations. For example, it would allow more Christian refugees fleeing the group’s genocidal spread to settle in the United States — something the Obama administration has been outrageously slow to do21 thus far, while at the same time doing nothing to stop the Islamic Trojan horse22 from entry.

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Digest 3-14-2016
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Lest we forget this isn’t political posturing, the Knights of Columbus and In Defense of Christians released a report23 detailing the torture, extortion and murder Christians experience by the hands the Islamic State. The 278-report, complied with a legal brief and the statements of 44 Iraqis, was submitted to the State Department.

The timing of this report, and the movement toward finally labelling the destruction of ISIL, couldn’t come at a better time. Such a declaration would add energy to the fight against this jihadi threat, and it comes as an Islamic State defector revealed the names and data24 of 22,000 of its members. With this information, the countries fighting the Islamic State can do everything from stamping out homegrown terrorism to pinpointing drones to conduct assassination strikes of the group’s top leaders. After months of half-hearted bombing runs and vows of no boots on the ground, it appears the West has the tools to bring the group to its knees.

Clinton v. The National Rifle Association25

Clinton risks becoming the next gun saleswoman in chief. The Democrat frontrunner has drawn a sharp stance on gun control, vowing Thursday, “I will take on the gun lobby.” Clinton has been traveling the campaign trail with Mothers of the Movement, an anti-gun organization with such members as the mother of Trayvon Martin. In gathering around her families of high-profile shootings, Clinton is drawing a sharp line between her and Bernie Sanders, who represents gun-friendly Vermont. She is also trying to court black voters who are sympathetic to the Black Lives Matter movement.

In a high-school gymnasium in North Carolina, Clinton vowed to take on lobbyists, Wall Street and big business. “But you know what the strongest lobby is?” Clinton said, “It’s the gun lobby, which intimidates people, threatens elected officials. It is time my friends, we stand together and say enough. I stand with the families of Sandy Hook.” If/when Clinton gets the Democrat nomination, her tough-on-guns stance will only encourage more firearm purchases in the nation, as citizens will be worried she will want to curtail the right to bear arms. Furthermore, this hard stance against the pro-gunners is statistically a less-than-advantageous position. In January, CNN published a poll26 that found 54% of Americans disapproved of Obama’s executive actions on gun control. Perhaps she should also recall the lesson of 1994, when her husband pushed gun control only to lose a landslide in the midterm election.

MORE ORIGINAL PERSPECTIVE

    ANALYSIS: Criminalizing Dissent3
    Low Dem Voter Turnout Obviously Is GOP’s Fault…27
    VA Scandal Could Have Stopped Earlier28
    Twilight Zone29

TOP HEADLINES

    German Voters Take Hard Line Against Angela Merkel’s Migration Policies30
    EPA Expands Methane Rules to All Oil and Gas Wells31
    ObamaCare Enrollment Is Down by 25%32

For more, visit Patriot Headline Report33

OPINION IN BRIEF

Hans von Spakovsky: “In news that should shock and anger Americans, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that not only has she discussed internally the possibility of pursuing civil actions against so-called ‘climate change deniers,’ but she has ‘referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action.’ … The absurdity of this would be laughable if it were not so serious and so dangerous. The very idea that the FBI, the most powerful law enforcement agency in the United States, has had a referral from the attorney general of the United State to investigate whether those who disagree with the climate change theory meet the legal ‘criteria for which’ the Justice Department ‘could take action’ is evocative of Franz Kafka’s chilling novel, ‘The Trial.’ As I have noted before, this is also reminiscent of the old Soviet Union, where Joseph Stalin persecuted those whom he thought had the ‘wrong’ scientific views on everything from linguistics to physics. Both Lynch and Whitehouse might want to read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book, ‘In the First Circle,’ in which he outlined the Soviet government’s suppression of dissenting scientists and engineers. Or perhaps General Lynch should review the Inquisition’s persecution of Galileo Galilei for disagreeing with the consensus of his time and advocating the Copernican theory of the universe. Level-headed, objective prosecutors should not be interested in investigating or prosecuting anyone over a scientific theory that is the subject of great debate.”

SHORT CUTS

The Gipper: “They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong. There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right. Winston Churchill said that ‘the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits — not animals.’”

Upright: “Trump is not the problem. He is also not the cure. He’s the symptom. The Republican Party is sick, and has been for a long time. For a generation Republican voters have consistently pulled the lever for whatever Republican has been trotted out; they are only now realizing they don’t have a lot to show for it. Voters are angry. … And at least some of this anger is justified. … Unfortunately for Republican voters, in their anger at their party leaders, they’ve missed the fact that they have even more reason to be distrustful of Trump. And they are running out of time to recognize their mistake.” —Caleb Verbois

Jack of clubs1: “I would like to see a little more violence from the innocent Trump supporters set upon by violent leftist hoodlums.” —Ann Coulter

Candid admission: “We’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.” —Hillary Clinton

Demo-gogues: “We’re the only advanced democracy in the world that makes it harder for people to vote. … It is much easier to order pizza or a trip than it is for you to exercise the single most important task in a democracy, and that is for you to select who’s going to represent you in government."—Barack Obama

Missing the point: "You cannot take an absolutist view on this. If your argument is strong encryption no matter what, and we can and should create black boxes, that I think does not strike the kind of balance we have lived with for 200, 300 years, and it’s fetishizing our phones above every other value.” —Barack Obama

Late-night humor: “A reporter claims she was pushed down by one of Donald Trump’s campaign advisers. Isn’t that crazy? Donald Trump has a campaign adviser.” —Conan O'Brien

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis!
Managing Editor Nate Jackson

Join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm’s way in defense of Liberty, and for their families.