The Patriot Post Brief 7-22-2013

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Brief 7-22-2013
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Racial Fiction

July 22, 2013

The Foundation

"It is not honorable to take mere legal advantage, when it happens to be contrary to justice." --Thomas Jefferson

Opinion in Brief

Editor's Note: Barack Hussein Obama walked into a White House press briefing Friday afternoon, unannounced. He used the briefing to deliver his political assessment of the Zimmerman/Martin case. Mark Alexander rebuts Obama's key points, then asks a more relevant question about the racial motivation behind the attack -- Martin's attack on Zimmerman, that is. Read Alexander's rebuttal here1.

"What did President Obama intend when he surprised the White House press corps on Friday with a statement on the not-guilty verdict in the murder trial of George Zimmerman? ... Reports of protests, small-scale breakaway riots, vengeful attacks by young rioters on passers-by, were rife in the media. His Justice Department had gone out on a limb half-promising a civil-rights prosecution against Zimmerman. If violence had then become widespread, the administration would likely have been held responsible. ... His starting point was that he wanted black America to understand he shared at least some of their disquiet about the trial without improperly challenging the not-guilty verdict. ... If [Obama] respects the jury verdict as he says ... then he must realize that Zimmerman's life has been turned upside down for months and is under serious threat today for actions that were at worst foolish and/or reckless. ... The second weakness of the president's appeal for empathy is that it is too indulgent. Putting yourself in someone else's place -- which is the classic definition of empathy -- means helping that person to deal realistically with his problems more than it means hugging him. It means tough love and honest talk. It means not endorsing someone's comforting delusions out of politeness. ... In the current context it means politely but firmly correcting the malicious fiction that a major threat to young black men -- and a major anxiety for their parents -- is murder at the hands of white racists. That fiction is itself a racist one." --National Review's John O'Sullivan2

Reader Comments

"In his rebuttal to Obama's race-bait remarks1 Friday afternoon, Mark Alexander's analysis is the most cogent anywhere. But I had to get to the last paragraph for the most challenging question I have heard anyone ask about this case. Alexander wrote, 'Race hustlers across the nation are calling for a civil rights investigation into Zimmerman's motives for shooting Martin. However, during Zimmerman's trial, it was clear that none of his actions were motivated by race. In fact, Rachel Jeantel, who was on the phone with Martin just prior to the altercation, testified that Martin described Zimmerman as a "creepy-ass white cracker." Seems a more pertinent question would be: Was Martin's assault on Zimmerman racially motivated?' Outstanding question, Alexander!" --Semper Fi! Kalifornia

"Responding to Alexander's essay, What Democrats Won't Say About Race3, the sad thing is that while we readily acknowledge the 'poverty plantations' that hold Blacks in continued servitude, we fail to admit that the rest of us are, at best, sharecroppers on the same plantation, ever subject to the whims of our government overseers. How long will we toil, however light our chains, before we rise and throw off this Socialist tyranny?" --Dennis in Montana

"Trayvon Martin is repeatedly referred to as a 'child.' But in my 34 years in the Marine Corps I worked with hundreds of 17-year-old male Marines. Not one of them would ever consider himself a 'child.'" --George in Rockport, Texas

Culture

"Eric Holder dismissed America as a 'nation of cowards' because we wouldn't, he argued, have a 'national conversation' about race. ... The slander is hydra-headed. No honest conversation about race is possible when accusations of racism replace reasoned arguments. ... Look around you. The violence and bitterness that have followed the Zimmerman verdict were virtually ordered up by convicted slanderer Al Sharpton and his many imitators. The Zimmerman case was complicated. Any fair-minded person could see that it was difficult to conclude that Zimmerman was not acting in self-defense (however unwise his initial actions may have been). But the racial-grievance industrial complex doesn't permit complexity. Racial enmity is their living. Stirring feelings of victimization and injustice among blacks and, to a lesser extent, among other designated minorities is their delight." --columnist Mona Charen4

Insight

"There is another class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs -- partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays." --former slave, educator, author and orator Booker T. Washington (1856-1915)

Government

"It is really amazing to behold the persistence of the Left's economic narratives. In every case where government interferes with a market to create cartels, misallocations of resources, and stifling fiscal burdens, the resulting social losses get blamed on ... the market! And the solution is ... more government interference! ... Back in 2011, I wrote [an article] comparing the history of Detroit and Houston over the last century. The Left's narrative now has it that the market favored Houston (oil) and not Detroit (cars). That totally ignores the acute oil glut of the 1980s, which sent Texas and Houston into a regional depression. The companies in Houston cried out for protection -- but instead of getting government help, they were allowed to go into bankruptcy. As a result, I wrote, Houston 'bounced back as if suspended from a bungee cord -- even though the oil bust lasted nearly two decades.' Houston followed the conservative vision of government, which is to get the government off the people's back and let them find their own way to prosperity. ... The cause of Detroit's epic fall from grandeur is not the market, but government interference in the market -- from crony capitalism to labor-union laws to welfare. ... In the case of Detroit, what government policies have done amounts to a crime against humanity." --National Review's Mario Loyola5

For the Record

"I stay in a small hotel in Dallas that used to have three people behind the registration desk. Some time ago the hotel put in kiosks into which you put your credit card and voila out came your room keycard with a printed folder telling you the room number. There remained only one person behind the registration desk to handle people who hadn't made a reservation in advance. Assuming there were two fully-staffed shifts a day that means four people per day were no longer needed. ... The hotel is more profitable because, through technology, it has reduced its workforce by four-or-so people every day. Public unions would never let that happen. If that hotel were a city like Detroit, the American Federation of Municipal Kiosk Workers would have demanded that every kiosk have an attendant. And the National Association of County Hotel Bill Sliders (AFL-CIO) would have demanded that at least two people remain on the payroll to change the paper in the room-bill printer, even if no room bills are being printed any more. The United Auto Workers based in Detroit has, for decades, had basically the same outlook as public unions. ... Fewer people paying less taxes to support more people doing less work. Hey. Wait a minute. That sounds very familiar." --columnist Rich Galen6