nChrist
|
 |
« on: March 24, 2012, 03:52:45 PM » |
|
________________________________________ Who Will Elect the Next President? From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Who Will Elect the Next President? By Mark Alexander · Thursday, March 22, 2012 The GOP's Weakest Link (No, not the Electoral College)
"Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual -- or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country." --Samuel Adams (1781)
"During Women's History Month," Obama proclaimed, "we ... reaffirm our steadfast commitment to the rights, security and dignity of women. ... We see the arc of the American story in the dynamic women who shaped our present and the groundbreaking girls who will steer our future. ... With the leadership of the White House Council on Women and Girls, my administration is ... making deep and lasting investments in the future of all Americans. I call upon all Americans to observe this month ... with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that honor the history, accomplishments, and contributions of American women."
Indeed, Obama should celebrate women and affirm his commitment to them -- because, by a wide margin, they elected him in 20081. More than 56 percent of women voted for Obama versus only 49 percent of men, a seven-point differential, and women may well be the deciding demographic again in 2012 if we conservatives don't get our message right.
Democrats are masters of the "politics of disparity2," using classist3, racist4 and gender5 issues to create division between Americans and thus conquer conservatives. Nowhere has that division been more successful than in racial demographics -- almost 95 percent of black Americans blindly vote to uphold the Democrats' plantation state. (The remaining five percent are probably the most courageous group of voters in America!) But by sheer numbers, women are the largest voting block and thus hold the greatest power to decide elections.
Amid all the questions about which GOP campaign themes will defeat Obama this year, one that conservatives had better start asking is, "What message will draw female voters back to the right side of the political ledger?" That question is critical both because in every presidential election since 1964 more women have voted than men, and because only 43 percent of them voted for McCain. With men voting in 2008 with almost even numbers for McCain and Obama, the women's vote gave Obama -- the most leftist and least qualified major-party candidate in presidential history -- an easy electoral win.
By "get our message right," I am not talking about topical pandering to women's special interests, but about enlisting more women into the front lines of the eternal fight for Essential Liberty6. While conservatives don't underestimate the critical role of women to the future of Liberty, we do a very poor job of recruiting. Women might not have signed our Declaration of Independence or Constitution, but today they are the deciding force -- the force that will vote to either sustain Liberty for future generations, or vote to overwhelm it with Democratic Socialism7.
Here are some additional statistics from Rutgers's Center for American Women and Politics8, verified through other sources, that deserve GOP attention.
In 2004, the majority of women voted for John Kerry, though the number of men voting for George W. Bush was sufficient to defeat Kerry. In 2000, a wide majority of women voted for Albert Gore, who carried the popular vote. If not for a razor-thin margin of victory in Florida -- one in which the Supreme Court stepped in to prevent Democrat party hacks from stealing the election via continual recounts -- Bush would never have had a first term awarded by the Electoral College. (I would note that had Al Gore merely won his, and my, home state of Tennessee, the Florida count would have been irrelevant -- but we in the Volunteer State knew Gore well enough to defeat him!)
In 1996, after Bill Clinton's record of womanizing was in full bloom thanks to Gennifer Flowers and the whole list of what Clinton's political adviser Betsey Wright coined "bimbo eruptions," 54 percent of women still voted for Clinton while only 38 percent voted for his Republican opponent, Bob Dole.
In 1992, 45 percent of women voted for Clinton versus 37 percent for George H.W. Bush. (Ross Perot rounded up the remaining votes.) Of course, as I noted early in the run-up to the 2008 campaign, putting an old guy like McCain up against Obama was tantamount to putting up old guys like Dole and Bush against Clinton -- with predictable results. Apparently the GOP did not learn the lesson.
Notably, however, 1988 was the last election where a majority of women voted for the Republican candidate -- 50 percent for George H.W. Bush, who narrowly edged out Michael Dukakis's 49 percent.
Of course, Ronald Reagan9 carried more women in both 1980 and 1984 than his younger Democrat opponents. President Reagan carried majorities of women and men because he centered his campaign message on Liberty and free enterprise rather than parsing it 10 different ways in a self-defeating attempt to round up special interest constituencies -- as Republican poll players advise candidates today. I would suggest, in fact, that the only reason that the elder Bush won a slim majority of women voters was carryover good will from President Reagan's tenure in office.
In 1988, Bush tried to win over the hearts of women by placating them with his "kinder, gentler" conservatism, which evoked this stern response from Nancy Reagan: "Kinder and gentler than who?" In the end, there is nothing kinder and gentler than Lady Liberty herself.
Once again in 2000, the younger Bush made "compassionate conservatism" a centerpiece of his campaign. Didn't work then, either.
So, what is the GOP to do?
When it comes to communication between men and women, I think the title of John Gray's bestseller, "Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus," is an apt metaphor. (Maybe in today's parlance, Men are from Google, Women are from Pinterest.) Apparently that divide is more prevalent in Republicans than Democrats.
I would argue that the gender divide is really centered on voter perception about a candidate's strength, and that the message, more than age and other factors, is the foundation of a candidate's strength. Though President Reagan was, at age 69, the oldest man ever elected to the presidency, he was rightfully seen by both men and women to be much stronger than either Jimmy Carter or Walter Mondale, both of whom he trounced at the polls. That was not true of the elder Bush, Dole or McCain, whose mild and muddled platform messages led to the perception that they were weaker than their younger opponents.
|