The Patriot Post - Memo to GOP Contenders: Cut the Crap!

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post - Memo to GOP Contenders: Cut the Crap!
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Memo to GOP Contenders: Cut the Crap!
By Mark Alexander · Thursday, October 20, 2011

    "If we move in mass, be it ever so circuitously, we shall attain our object; but if we break into squads...we become an easy conquest to those who can now barely hold us in check." --Thomas Jefferson, 1811

With the most recent GOP presidential primary "debate" just concluded, it's clear that the frontrunner is none other than ... you guessed it, Barack Hussein Obama. The incessant bickering bullpucky and petty assaults among most of the GOP wannabes is undoubtedly a source of great glee for the Obama campaign. That infighting, and the fact that Obama's adoring Leftmedia sycophants1 are promoting the GOP candidates they believe Obama can most readily defeat, largely account for the GOP candidate poll standings -- and are keeping Obama in the lead.

The intraparty rancor among the GOP candidates, both on and off the debate stage, is the direct result of archaic advice from the old-school network of Beltway political and media consultants relying upon their worn-out primary playbooks. Apparently they all missed the "Tea Party2" message of the midterm elections beyond the Beltway, which heralded a new breed of conservatives and a new House majority.

Of course, it will take more than one election cycle to purge all the establishment Republicans from the House and Senate -- those who still exercise considerable control over Congress. I'm concerned, however, that the Republic may not have enough election cycles remaining3 to restore Liberty4, especially if the Republican presidential hopefuls don't clean up their act. On their current self-destructive course, they'll readily hand re-election to Obama.

In 1966, Ronald Reagan5 adopted for primary candidates what his California Republican chairman labeled "The Eleventh Commandment": "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican." Two years earlier, an outstanding conservative, Barry Goldwater, had lost his presidential bid to liberal Democrat Lyndon Johnson only after Goldwater was attacked by East Coast establishment Republicrats like Nelson Rockefeller, who labeled him an "extremist" and declared him unfit for the presidency.

Recall that Reagan delivered the defining speech6 of the modern conservative movement in support of Barry Goldwater in '64, on ground laid by conservatives Russell Kirk and William F. Buckley. Had Goldwater won that campaign, the American political landscape would look very different today. Absent would be Johnson's "Great Society" government programs, which were the model for Obama's advanced breed of Democrat Socialists7.

In subsequent campaigns, including his two presidential elections, Ronald Reagan abided by that 11th Commandment, unless defending himself, and he set an outstanding course for American renewal8. But most of the current crop of GOP contenders is too busy hacking at each other to take a lesson from history. Of course, it took an individual of Reagan's character and stature to rise above pettiness and egomaniacal ambition that now besieges the GOP field.

Prior to these recent debates, I sent (via emissaries) this simple message to each Republican contender: "As publisher of the most widely read conservative grassroots publication on the Internet, here is some advice from outside the Beltway. If you want to win the 2012 presidential primary, STOP attacking your Republican opponents and START talking about what you will do as president to restore constitutional integrity, free enterprise, national defense, family values and America's standing around the world. This is a different election cycle from those in past decades, and the old formulas for debates should be discarded. I beg you to abide by Reagan's 11th commandment and stop attacking your opponent's record and focus on your own ... on what you can and will do as president. American Patriots want to learn about you, not about how effectively your campaign handlers can prepare you to attack other Republicans. The political paradigm has changed, and if your media and PR consultants do not comprehend that change, the result might well be the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama."

One of the candidates responded accordingly. Though already written off as unelectable by the media, in my opinion he would eviscerate Obama in "mano y mano" debate.

I won't mention him by name, because there isn't a GOP contestant whom I consider the "ideal candidate," and I don't want it to be inferred that I believe any of the current candidates fit that bill. (I believe Ronald Reagan was the most outstanding conservative president of the past century, but I certainly don't think he was flawless -- and neither did he.)

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post - Memo to GOP Contenders: Cut the Crap!
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Those of us who have observed presidential campaigns for decades know that there is no "perfect candidate9" in the current lineup, one who will be capable of, in the words of my colleague Cal Thomas, "delivering us from our collective economic, social and foreign policy 'sins' and bring redemption to a nation from the consequences of too many wrong-headed choices." Thomas adds, "Perhaps a Republican president with a 60-vote, veto-proof Senate majority and an expanded House majority might be able to revolutionize government, but only if squishy Republicans in both bodies went along, which seems problematic, especially on big issues."

However, if GOP contenders don't stop attacking each other, none of them will even have the chance to correct the course of our nation.

Fortunately, two of the GOP candidates have clearly upheld Reagan's 11th commandment in each of the debates, and every other contender should heed their example.

During the Reagan Presidential Foundation debate, one of the two chastised moderator John Harris for his bald-faced attempt to stir intraparty arguments: "Well, I'm frankly not interested in your effort to get Republicans fighting each other. ... I for one, and I hope all of my friends up here, am going to repudiate every effort of the news media to get Republicans to fight each other to protect Barack Obama who deserves to be defeated. And all of us are committed as a team, whoever the nominee is, we are all for defeating Barack Obama."

In the most recent debate, he chastised CNN pretty boy Anderson Cooper: "Maximizing bickering is probably not the road to the White House. And the technique you've used maximizes going back and forth over and over again."

Unfortunately, the rest of the candidates seem unwilling to rise above the pettiness.

Beyond the bickering, none of the candidates has given more than peripheral attention to the most pressing issue of the current era -- the restoration of constitutional integrity -- though I know a couple of them certainly place that task above all others. Perhaps their handlers have convinced them that the American people are just too dullard to participate in a more substantive national debate about constitutional authority and the First Principles of Liberty. However, in reality most of today's Beltway politicos couldn't begin to articulate the distinction between Rule of Law10 and rule of men, and the implications for Liberty, and thus are not prepared to integrate that into their campaign template.

That notwithstanding, there is a growing legion of conservatives who are, first and foremost, concerned about the abject violation of the limits that our Constitution places upon the central government. These constitutional conservatives, who were largely responsible for seating a House majority in 2010, are poised to increase that majority, and seat a Senate majority, in 2012.

Fact is, almost twice as many Americans self-identify as "conservative11" than as "liberal12," but apparently that stat hasn't made it across the Potomac, where establishment Republicans still exercise the greatest influence.

Some 200 years ago, Thomas Jefferson wisely advised, "If we move in mass, be it ever so circuitously, we shall attain our object; but if we break into squads, everyone pursuing the path he thinks most direct, we become an easy conquest to those who can now barely hold us in check." Some 2000 years ago, the wisest of all men advised: "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand."

Democrats are masters of "divide-and-conquer13" strategies. The GOP candidates best rise above the impetuous rancor and use the next debate to unite the plurality of conservatives for the single purpose of defeating Obama.

In the meantime, conservatives must reject the Leftmedia pollaganda14 promoting the media choice for the GOP ticket. For more on the GOP field, visit The Patriot Post's campaign resource page15, where we've compiled all the 2012 presidential candidate links as well as debate transcripts and videos.

(Please pray for our Armed Forces standing in harm's way around the world, and for their families -- especially families of those fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who granted their lives in defense of American liberty.)

Links

    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2008/07/25/the-obamaphiles-baracks-leftmedia-sycophants/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2010/06/24/the-tea-party-movement/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/05/12/sunset-or-sunrise-on-liberty/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/08/25/ballots-or-bullets/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/02/03/the-reagan-centennial/
    http://reagan2020.us/speeches/A_Time_for_Choosing.asp
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/03/10/democratic-socialism/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2010/02/04/the-reagan-model-for-restoration/
    http://patriotpost.us/opinion/cal-thomas/2011/10/04/messiah-complex-the-sequel/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2009/09/03/essential-liberty-part-1/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2011/04/14/american-patriot-defined/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2004/09/24/useful-idiots-on-the-left/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2006/03/17/the-politics-of-disparity/
    http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2008/01/18/pollaganda-political-polling-as-propaganda/
    http://patriotpost.us/reference/2012-presidential-candidates/