|
nChrist
|
 |
« on: June 10, 2011, 05:35:37 PM » |
|
________________________________________
The Patriot Post - Obama Proclaims June 'Gender Confusion' Month
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________
Obama Proclaims June 'Gender Confusion' Month
By Mark Alexander · Thursday, June 9, 2011
AKA: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month
"Marriage is ... in its origin a contract of natural law... It is the parent, and not the child of society; the source of civility and a sort of seminary of the republic." --Justice Joseph Story (Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws)
It is said that Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Barack Hussein Obama, likewise, has certainly been occupying himself with frivolity whilst the U.S. economy edges closer to collapse.
The community-organizer-in-chief took time out from his busy Memorial Day golfing schedule to proclaim June "National Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Pride Month," as he has done annually since his election. "The story of America's LGBT community is the story of our fathers and sons, our mothers and daughters, and our friends and neighbors who continue the task of making our country a more perfect Union," said Obama, who apparently comes from both an odd family and neighborhood. He instructed all Americans to "rededicate ourselves to the pursuit of equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity."
That instruction prompted support from legions of his Socialist Bourgeoisie1, including, for example, those at the Federal Reserve Bank in Richmond, who, as the central government freefalls toward insolvency, ordered the "gay pride" flag flown with our national flag.
Fed spokesman Jim Strader claimed, "It represents the bank's commitment to diversity and inclusion." The bank's chief operating officer Sally Green added, "We strongly support a diverse and inclusive culture at the Richmond Fed and ... the 'pride' flag as an example of our commitment to the values of acceptance and inclusion."
Meanwhile, the economy continues to deteriorate. "We don't know yet what happened in terms of this particular blip," said Obama, referring to a shocking May jobs report that saw a paltry 54,000 new jobs created and the nation's unemployment rate increase to 9.1 percent. That "blip" portends the sinking of the ship, but at least Obama and his flock of gender-confused sycophants can take comfort in knowing that our nation will have a "diverse and inclusive culture" when its economy collapses.
For all the attention the gender-challenged draw, one would think that they represent at least as large a constituency as the Democrat Party's2 most devoted dependency -- blacks -- who make up about 12 percent of our population. But, despite Obama's insistence that they are "our fathers and sons, our mothers and daughters, and our friends and neighbors," according to reliable research and surveys, homosexuals compose less than 3 percent of the population. So, why all the attention?
The answer to that question is not headlined on the pages of most conservative political journals. Many analysts will not venture into the race debate3 unless, of course, they are among my conservative colleagues who happen to be black, which provides some cover as they expose Democrat "plantation politics." Rarer still are analysts who take on the LGBT agenda. Those who do will most certainly be accused of "intolerance" and chastised for their opposition to "diversity and inclusion," which may in turn subject their syndicators to commercial boycott (one more reason The Patriot Post does not accept advertising).
However, concerns about such accusations should not keep conservatives from "outing" the truth, so "flame" me if you want -- but preferably after reading Gender Disorientation Pathology4, my summary of how we should respond to homosexuals versus the homosexual agenda.
Clearly, the "homosexual normalization" is a high priority for the Left, and they are focusing most of their energy on two fields of opportunity. The first is overturning federal laws which "discriminate against gays," beginning with proscriptions concerning homosexuals in our military service branches.
Until 1993, when Bill Clinton instituted the so-called "don't ask, don't tell" policy giving legal standing to homosexuals in our military and intelligence institutions, those organizations maintained long-standing moratoriums prohibiting homosexual employment because they posed a high risk of compromise, and moreover because of the obvious degradation of morale5 associated with homosexuals in military ranks. However, in 2008, Obama made it a "top priority" of his administration to repeal DADT and allow open homosexual access to any and all military operations.
In 2010, the United States suffered the most significant intelligence compromise in history, perpetrated by a disgruntled homosexual, Army PFC Bradley Manning. Devastated over news that his "partner" was leaving him, Manning attempted to win back his boyfriend's affections by "heroically" stealing, according to allegations, some 500,000 classified documents and communiqués from the government's SIPRNet and JWICS intelligence sharing networks. He then provided them to WikiLeaks for publication. Manning is now in lockdown at Ft. Leavenworth, charged with "aiding and abetting the enemy," which is a capital offense.
Obama's response? He has had scant to say about Manning's treason, and just months after Manning's arrest, and before Democrat congressional ranks were decimated by incoming Republicans from the midterm election, Obama had Democrats in Congress push through "Do Ask, Do Tell6" legislation, which ended any proscription against homosexuals in the military. |
