The Patriot Post Brief 7-5-2010

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Brief 7-5-2010
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

The Foundation

"At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous." --Thomas Jefferson

Political Futures
The Kagan Show Hearings

"[In her confirmation hearings last week, Elena] Kagan did her best to say nothing, and her best was sufficient unto the day. She reduced the vapid to the insipid, as in an exchange with Sen. Tom Coburn over the limits of the Constitution's Commerce Clause -- written by the Founders to limit the power of the federal government and distorted by liberals, both on the Supreme Court and off, to enable the feds to expand the nanny state without limit. When Mr. Coburn asked whether Congress could enact a law requiring Americans to eat three fruits and three vegetables a day, Mzz Kagan replied: 'That sounds like a dumb law.' Mr. Coburn was trying to get at her view of the Commerce Clause, and got a wisecrack. Mzz Kagan then added that the courts would be wrong to strike down a dumb law just because it was dumb. What's not at all dumb about the question is that President Obama is relying on the Commerce Clause to defend his own dumb idea, the health care 'reform.' But not to laugh. The left is always eager to defend its dumb ideas. ... Since Mzz Kagan has never been a judge, we don't have a judicial record to measure her by, and we must rely on her vague answers to vapid questions and can only surmise, suppose and speculate. She sounds like a reliable liberal, ready to stand up for the law of the nanny, enforced by the rod of the state. We won't know for sure until it's time to bend over." --Washington Times editor emeritus Wesley Pruden

For the Record

"As the great Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, his job was 'to see that the game is played according to the rules whether I like them or not.' If the public doesn't like the rules, or the consequences to which the rules lead, then the public can change the rules via the ballot box. But that is very different from judges changing the rules by verbal sleight of hand, or by talking about 'weighing of the constitutional right to bear arms' against other considerations, as Justice Breyer puts it. That's not his job. Not if 'we the people' are to govern ourselves, as the Constitution says. As for the merits or demerits of gun control laws themselves, a vast amount of evidence, both from the United States and from other countries, shows that keeping guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals. It is not uncommon for a tightening of gun control laws to be followed by an increase -- not a decrease -- in gun crimes, including murder. Conversely, there have been places and times where an increase in gun ownership has been followed by a reduction in crimes in general and murder in particular. Unfortunately, the media intelligentsia tend to favor gun control laws, so a lot of hard facts about the futility, or the counterproductive consequences of such laws, never reach the public through the media. ... The media, like Justice Breyer, might do well to reflect on what is their job and what is the voting public's job." --economist Thomas Sowell

Culture

"[In] the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision ... in the case of Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (UC Hastings) ... [the] court ruled that a public university is not required to subsidize campus groups it considers discriminatory. The Christian Legal Society excludes homosexuals and non-Christians. But isn't the court allowing the university to discriminate against the beliefs of the Christian group, especially if the group is now required to admit people who violate teachings central to its faith and mission statement? In writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the school's policy, which requires student organizations to be open to everyone to qualify for official status, 'ensures that no Hastings student is forced to fund a group that would reject her as a member.' I wonder if this would apply to a member of CLS if they applied for membership in the gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender club, or anything else that may come down the pike. Will campus Jewish groups be required to admit Christians? Maybe the football team can bring a discrimination suit against the school for not allowing them to shower with the women's lacrosse team. The court's ruling in the CLS case is no less far-fetched. Student activity fees have long subsidized campus organizations whose beliefs and practices no doubt offend and are counter to the beliefs and practices of other students. The way the legal game is played, the beliefs of Christian groups can be regularly offended, but gay and other groups favored by the secular left enjoy special status from academic elites. This is what passes for pluralism, tolerance and academic freedom on college campuses." --columnist Cal Thomas

Liberty

"Obama is turning us into a poster nation for financial irresponsibility. While other nations at the [G-20 conference in Toronto] were focusing on deficit reduction, Obama was haplessly urging them to join us in Keynesian spending oblivion. He told the conference that global economic recovery remains 'fragile' and implored the nations' leaders to continue deficit spending to sustain the 'recovery.' The Washington Post reports that Obama's remarks 'tempered the Group of 20's headline achievement at the summit, a deficit-reduction target that had been pushed by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the host of the meeting and a fiscal conservative.' Obama is wholly impervious to the historical record documenting the failure of FDR's pump priming during the Depression, which exacerbated rather than ameliorated the economic problems. He is similarly detached from reality concerning the failure of his own policies to stimulate growth of any kind to save his beloved public sector and thus recommends more of the same. In speech after speech, he takes credit for having launched an economic recovery in the United States and for achieving job growth. Notwithstanding his economic models that stubbornly predict such results, he can point to no empirical evidence to verify his delusional boasts. It would be bad enough if his economic policies were simply retarding our economic recovery, but they are also accelerating our trip to national bankruptcy. Yet Obama continues to press forward with his foot smashed down on the gas pedal." --columnist David Limbaugh

[nChrist]

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Brief 7-5-2010
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

The Gipper

"The fact is, we'll never build a lasting economic recovery by going deeper into debt at a faster rate than we ever have before. ... Inflation is the cause of recession and unemployment. And we're not going to have real prosperity or recovery until we stop fighting the symptoms and start fighting the disease. There's only one cause for inflation -- government spending more than government takes in. The cure is a balanced budget. Ah, but they tell us, 80 percent of the budget is uncontrollable. It's fixed by laws passed by Congress. Well, laws passed by Congress can be repealed by Congress. And, if Congress is unwilling to do this, then isn't it time we elect a Congress that will?" --Ronald Reagan

Faith & Family

"Material poverty can be measured relatively or absolutely. An absolute measure would consist of some minimum quantity of goods and services deemed adequate for a baseline level of survival. Achieving that level means that poverty has been eliminated. However, if poverty is defined as, say, the lowest one-fifth of the income distribution, it is impossible to eliminate poverty. Everyone's income could double, triple and quadruple, but there will always be the lowest one-fifth. Yesterday's material poverty is all but gone. In all too many cases, it has been replaced by a more debilitating kind of poverty -- behavioral poverty or poverty of the spirit. This kind of poverty refers to conduct and values that prevent the development of healthy families, work ethic and self-sufficiency. The absence of these values virtually guarantees pathological lifestyles that include: drug and alcohol addiction, crime, violence, incarceration, illegitimacy, single-parent households, dependency and erosion of work ethic. Poverty of the spirit is a direct result of the perverse incentives created by some of our efforts to address material poverty." --George Mason University economics professor Walter E. Williams

Reader Comments

"I have made my donation as a responsible Patriot. I just want to thank you for the great job The Patriot Post staff are doing in fighting for freedom for all Americans. One of the best things that has happened to me as an American Patriot was receiving my first email from The Patriot Post. Since that time I look forward to every email from The Patriot and forward them far and wide. The Patriot has provided me a much better understanding of our Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Federalist Papers. As noted by the Military Mom quoted in Mr. Alexander's last appeal, receiving The Patriot Post has inspired me to join the fight against the Left's socialist agenda. God Bless The Patriot and God Bless America." --a veteran

"I gladly supported The Patriot Post early in the year at the Company Command level. I have just added the same amount again, in support of your Independence Day campaign. I have the greatest admiration and appreciation for each of you at The Patriot Post! Keep up the GREAT work, God bless you all!" --Bill

"It was a real pleasure to finally donate to your cause. I have wanted to for a long time but being a disabled Fire Fighter on a limited income it seems like the opportunity to donate was never there. Well, it wasn't here either, but regardless I just had to send you something. I remain a Patriot, involved with conservative ideals and the tea party movement. I have been a reader of The Patriot Post for quite some time and have encouraged many many others to get on board, including my children and grandkids. Your publication is a safe harbor in a sea of violent storms. It is a thrill to stand with you in this endeavor. I only wish that I could do more both physically and financially. Rest assured, though, I will do all that I can. God Bless you and your entire staff and may God continue to Bless America." --Thomas

Editor's Note: As of this morning, our 2010 Independence Day Campaign stands at 98 percent with many mail donations yet to be tallied. Many, many thanks to all who supported The Patriot Post over the last three weeks.

The Last Word

"So a lot of scientists -- and especially politicians, actors, and musicians -- are really, really super certain we have to do something about this 'global climate warming change,' as they call it, but seem unable to convince the average man it's not a bunch of mumbo jumbo -- especially to the extent that everyone is going to agree to economy-massacring policies. That seems perfectly rational to me; if I'm wrong, and we're destined for doom but the only way to live is to be a bunch of hippies, I'd rather be dead. ... So I'm happy to punt this possible crisis down the road and worry about the more concrete and better understood problem that the sun is eventually going to kill us all. Which apparently makes me like someone who denies the murders of millions of Jews in the Holocaust. See, the other day, Paul McCartney (who long ago participated in creating a song warning of the global warming crisis, the chilling 'Here Comes the Sun') compared skepticism about global warming to Holocaust denial. And he's certainly not the first. ... Do these people not understand what the Holocaust was? We're talking about a coordinated attempt to exterminate the Jews. Millions of them were rounded up and sent to forced labor camps and killed in gas chambers. It's horrific beyond belief. How could one compare the temperature possibly rising a couple degrees to people being put in ovens? What low opinion must those people have of Jews -- of their fellow human beings? ... The Holocaust was the nadir of humanity, the worst man can be to his fellow man, and it's not some political point to be tossed around because you're super duper certain your issue is really, really important. If the people worrying about global warming want to convince others, maybe they should reflect a bit more on how to be less repugnant about it." --columnist Frank J. Fleming

(Please pray for our Armed Forces standing in harm's way around the world, and for their families -- especially families of those fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who granted their lives in defense of American liberty.)