nChrist
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2010, 02:06:03 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Brief 5-17-2010 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
For the Record
"Sen. Tom Coburn (R.-Okla.) came charging into the U.S. Senate six years ago determined to gun down the most dangerous issue facing the country: uncontrolled government spending and debt. He put delaying holds on countless spending bills, angering many of his colleagues. He offered an untold number of budget-cutting amendments to block, reduce or eliminate spending. He has fought, condemned and stomped on just about every waste-ridden bill to come before the Senate so many times that Democrats call him 'Dr. No,' a name he considers a badge of honor. Now he finds himself on President Obama's politically inspired, dubiously worthwhile commission to come up with ways to cut trillions of dollars from a mountain of debt. Coburn is outnumbered on the commission by a hand-picked majority of big spenders, but is coming well-armed with a detailed list of outdated, needless, unaffordable, fraud-ridden programs, agencies and expenditures that he has shoved under their noses, suggesting that these cuts would be a good place to start before even thinking about raising taxes. ... In 1984, the Grace Commission, under orders from President Reagan to expose waste, fraud and abuse throughout the U.S. government, concluded that at least one in every three dollars in federal spending was wasted. Today that would amount to about $1.2 trillion. Obama's 18-member commission was just getting started last month when Coburn gave each member a thick, black binder filled with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of candidates for the axe. His office refuses to give out copies to the press, not wanting to be seen as bashing the panel in the media, but commission members say Coburn is pushing his proposals vigorously and will be a major force to be reckoned with in the commission's deliberations." --columnist Donald Lambro Don't miss the best conservative opinion and the most relevant news headlines at The Patriot Post — all with NO advertising!
Faith & Family
"You have to wonder what God thinks when scanning recent headlines. For example, 'Comedy Central's 'JC' to Depict Cartoon Jesus' announces an animated show in development for the cable network that would portray Jesus as a 'regular guy' who moves to New York to 'escape his father's enormous shadow.' Reports say, 'His father is presented as an apathetic man who would rather play video games than listen to his son talk about his new life.' Of course, that story only demonstrates that in America we protect freedom of expression, even if it potentially offends more than 80 percent of the citizenry that is resolutely Christian. A more dangerous and disturbing story this week is titled, 'Senior citizens told they can't pray before meals.' In Port Wentworth, Ga., patrons of the Ed Young Senior Center, owned by the city of Port Wentworth but operated contractually by Senior Centers Inc., were told they could observe a moment of silence, but not pray aloud before eating their federally subsidized food. The folks at Senior Centers, Inc. interpreted the guidelines issued by the state Office on Aging to prohibit the free and open expression of faith simply because $5.45 worth of the $6 per plate meal is paid for with federal funds. No wonder Comedy Central thinks G0d is apathetic. ... Within a few days, the state's Office on Aging clarified that their guidelines do not prohibit citizens from joining together to pray aloud; they only prohibit city employees or employees of the service provider from leading the patrons in prayer. ... This is the nonsensical world in which we live -- and in which our children are growing to believe that public prayer is actually outlawed." --columnist Marybeth Hicks
Reader Comments
"Your scorn for the idea of a 'living Constitution' is not justified. Jefferson wrote, 'I am not an advocate for free changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.' If applying the Constitution were simply a mechanical process, not requiring the application of judgment, wisdom or experience, judges would be unnecessary." --Jim
Editor's Reply: Your assertions are devoid of any sense of Constitutional Rule of Law, much less any understanding of Jefferson's advocacy for the same. Our Framers understood that our Constitution would require alteration with enlightenment. That is why they provide a means for such alteration in Article V, rather than by judicial diktat by what Jefferson called "the despotic branch."
"If the Supreme Court was not intended to adjudicate matters of Constitutionality, as the Jefferson quote implies, what was the intended safeguard against the codification of unconstitutional laws? Was the ballot box supposed to be the citizens' only recourse?" --Kent
Editor's Reply: Of course not. Jefferson understood that when the ballot box fails, the bullet box will succeed. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of Patriots and tyrants?
"The Patriot Post's Digest is one really great way to learn all the news we sure don't get in our papers, on TV or radio! I am always surprised at how much I learn about what really is going on in our country and around the world that is not readily available to the public in our media world. Thank you so much for keeping me up to date and aware of the good, evil, and even scary things happening to America every day! Keep up the great work, and God Bless America! --Patricia
The Last Word
"Under the leadership of the first lady, the Obama administration has unveiled a series of proposals to combat obesity in children. Among the 70 recommendations: new federal subsidies for fruits and vegetables; taxes on sodas, candy, and junk food; and mandates on federally funded and private health programs to cover obesity-related problems. Mrs. Obama and her crack team of federal do-gooders did not consider that the federal government is also in the business of feeding a significant portion of the population. The scale of federal nutrition programs is actually quite staggering. One in eight adult Americans now receives food stamps, along with 25 percent of children. More than half of all American infants are on the WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) nutrition program. Sixty-two percent of American schoolchildren who eat school lunches are getting free or reduced-price meals. How in the world did programs intended to keep the neediest Americans from malnutrition end up feeding -- even overfeeding -- such a huge percentage of the population?" --columnist Mona Charen
(Please pray for our Armed Forces standing in harm's way around the world, and for their families -- especially families of those fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who granted their lives in defense of American liberty.)
|