Scientists have discovered a fossilised snake which weighed in at an astonishing estimated 2,500 pounds!!
and was 42.7 feet nose to tail tip.
The estimated evolutionary age of the fossil is approx 60-million-year-old...eya rrrighttt.

Anyway, this humungus python was discovered in South America.
Now this huge snake needs an evolutionary explanation and so sure enough the good folks in that fairy tale world have come up with a hummer!
The reason this snake, according to them, grew so enormous is due to
temperature!
here's a quote...
"Drs Jason Head and David Polly carried out much of the quantitative work behind the discovery whilst working in the School of Biological and Chemical Sciences at Queen Mary, University of London; they identified the position of the fossil vertebrae which made a size estimate possible. Now based at the University of Indiana, Polly explains: "At its greatest width, the snake would have come up to about your hips. The size is pretty amazing. But our team went a step further and asked, how warm would the Earth have to be to support a body of this size?"
Wowee! A snake that is so fat, it would come up to a man's hips!! This is absolutely astounding my friends.
I have an explanation for the snake's enormous size, but first let's take a look at what the evolutionists are saying as they struggle to come up with something sounding scientific and intelligent without the need for God!
Crews led by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the University of Florida's Florida Museum of Natural History discovered the fossils in the Cerrejon Coal Mine in northern Colombia, and together with lead-author Jason Head now of the University of Toronto-Mississauga, used its size to make an estimate of Earth's temperature 58 to 60 million years ago in tropical South America.
Sounds pretty scientific so far huh? What with these goofy ages in the tens of millions of years!
"Paleontologists have long known of a rough correlation between an age's temperature and the size of its poikilotherms (cold-blooded creatures). Over geological time, as ages get warmer, so does the upper size limit on poikilotherms."
"There are many ways the anatomy of a species is correlated with its environment on broad scales," Polly said. " If we understand these correlations better, we will know more about how climate and climate change affect species, as well as how we can infer things about past climates from the morphology of the species that lived back then."
Notice the language here, which is extremely typical of all evolutionary gobbledy-gook.
They actually admit they do not understand what's going on in relation to this hypothesis about temperature and the size of a species! Amazing! Here's a prediction: the statement made above which states, "
If we understand these correlations better, we will know more about how climate and climate change affect speciesIn other words, we do not understand these correlations, "but if we did..." OK, I predict that in spite of this acknowledgement, this hypothesis will be used as empirical proof as to why this snake grew so large.
OK, bare with me a while longer as I give more examples of how evolution conclusions are reached.
Read the following quote...
" Assuming the Earth today is not particularly unusual, Head and Dr Jonathan Bloch, Assistant Curator of Vertebrate Palaeontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History, estimated a snake of Titanoboa's size would have required an average annual temperature of 30 to 34°C (86 to 93 F) to survive. By comparison, the average yearly temperature of today's Cartagena, a Colombian coastal city, is about 28°C."
Again, this type of language is very typical for evolutionary conclusions.
Lots of assumptions and guess work based on those assumptions, which are based on presuppositions. This is not empirical science!
But hey, it gets even better my friends.
take a read...
"Tropical ecosystems of South America were surprisingly different 60 million years ago," said Bloch. "It was a rainforest, like today, but it was even hotter and the cold-blooded reptiles were all substantially larger. The result was, among other things, the largest snakes the world has ever seen... and hopefully ever will."
OK, first of all, there is absolutely no empirical proof for such outrageous ages. the dating methods used are extremely unreliable and the dates reached are not based on actual rock dating, but rather these ages are based exclusively on evolutionary assumptions based on presuppositions! yes, I can prove this beyond doubt.
I actually will start a new thread exposing these useless dating methods and I will use evolutionary scientists themselves to make the point! For the purposes of this particular post, let's leave the dating behind for now.
Secondly, I would like to talk to the person who was there over
60 million years ago, and I would love to ask him exactly how warm the weather was back then! LOL! My friend, there is no way of knowing what temperatures or climates were in the assumed 60 millions years in the past! This stuff is all assumed! I can prove it, just read what the evolutionists say next...
"The temperature estimation shows that a tropical rainforest, like Cerrejon, lived at a temperature of 32°C, five degrees above the upper limit of temperature for tropical rainforest in modern times," said Carlos Jaramillo, a palaeobotanist ad the Smithsonian Topical Research Institute. "These data challenge the view that tropical vegetation lives near its climatic optimum and it has profound implications in understanding the effect of current global warming on tropical plants."
Wow! so in order for the evolutionists to get the
correct assumed (oxymoron anyone?) temperatures for this snake to grow so huge, they are forced to challenge empirically known temperature limits for tropical rainforest in modern times!! What??!!
Amazing! In other words what we see today is not possible because if it were this snake could not be as long as it is!! LOL!
To Continue In Next Post...