______________________________
The Patriot Post Brief 08-34
From The Federalist Patriot
______________________________
FAMILY“The reaction of the American Left to John Edwards’s sex scandal is nothing short of flabbergasting. Since when is sex outside of marriage a disqualifier for merely speaking at a political convention? Since when is having sexual relations with that woman in your office anything wrong? Since when do we judge? The difference here seems to be that Elizabeth Edwards has cancer. So only fatal disease makes the bonds of marriage sacred? Although the last thing I want to look to be doing is making excuses for adultery - what he did was wrong - the John Edwards incident begs Americans to look in the mirror. If we think what John Edwards did with Rielle Hunter is wrong, why do we think it’s wrong? Because marriage is at the foundation of our society and we should do what we can to protect every last one? Or simply because having fun while your wife is fighting a fatal disease is a lousy thing to do? I don’t know how we can condemn John Edwards when Americans have been known to cheer for cheaters in movies, watch celebs do it all the time as a form of perverse entertainment, and even insist we’re not sure what exactly ‘marriage’ means.” - Kathryn Jean Lopez
CULTURE“Barack Obama, as Shelby Steele has written, departs from the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton brand of politics in that he is far more sophisticated and subtle in how to play on white guilt and how to intimidate. That’s new. But the liberal content and agenda is not new, and this, blacks continue to buy en masse. The points conservatives have been hammering home for the last 20 years have not been for naught. There is increasing awareness among blacks how family breakdown is driving the social problems of the community. This is not lost on Obama. His speeches paying credence to the importance and relevance of personal responsibility are well received among blacks, but also play well to the whites he wishes to reach. But the program behind the words remains comfortably lodged on the far left. Big government answers for everything, redistribution of wealth, use of law as a tool for politics, liberal abortion policies, and legitimization of the gay agenda. The relevant question is... will black politics - black uniform support for liberals - ever change?” - Star Parker
SELECT READER COMMENTS(Our servers automatically delete “Reply” messages to this e-mail. To submit or to view reader comments visit our Reader Comments page. Join the debate at the Patriot Blog.)
“I couldn’t agree more with David Limbaugh’s take on the race issue. I’m a white male and I wouldn’t vote for Obama in a hundred years. Not because of his race, but rather for his socialist and anti-American agenda.” - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
“It is painfully clear that racism is alive and well in America. Unfortunately, Liberals use race, gender, class and religion as tools to further segregate our society, all the while convincing minorities that they are discriminated against. Besides, what ever would people like Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, et al, do for a living if minorities were no longer oppressed?” - Houston, Texas
“During the primary races, on two different occasions, I watched the ‘Meet the Press’ panel discuss the race issue in this election. They, without exception, spoke of the surveys that confirmed that ‘angry white men’ would never vote for Obama and that there was still such severe racial prejudice is this country that a black man could not be elected president. When asked why 97 percent of blacks voted for Obama, this was explained away as ‘black pride.’ A white vote against Obama is prejudice; a black vote for Obama is black pride. These bright intellectuals will not consider that a white vote against Obama might be based on policy differences.” - Hillsborough, California
GOVERNMENT“Senator Obama has also said many times that he is against ‘special interests.’ But, like most politicians who say that, he means that he is against other politicians’ special interests. His own special interests are never called special interests. Neither are the environmental extremists who support the Democrats called special interests. But the green zealots who have for decades blocked the country from using oil within our own borders - more oil than in Saudi Arabia, by the way - are also among the special interests with a big voice in the Democratic Party. They are also a major factor in shutting down the democratic voting process - in this case, in the House of Representatives, where Speaker Nancy Pelosi refuses to allow a vote on drilling for oil in places where the green zealots don’t want drilling. The Congressional Democrats could of course vote to continue forbidding drilling in those places. But voters paying $4 a gallon for gas are not likely to agree with the green zealots - and recent polls show that they do not. Rather than lose votes in the November elections by voting with the green zealots, or lose the money that the green zealots contribute to the Democratic Party coffers, Nancy Pelosi simply shut down the House of Representatives, so that there could be no votes, and turned off the lights so that C-SPAN could not broadcast Republicans’ speeches protesting what happened. After all, what is democracy compared to support from the green zealots?” - Thomas Sowell
________________________________________