______________________________
The Patriot Post Brief 08-29
From The Federalist Patriot
______________________________
OPINION IN BRIEF“It’s time for rage - good, old American rage aimed at those elitist Democrats who prefer to see the folks beggared by soaring fuel prices rather than take the action this very real economic crisis demands. Drill... A partial answer to our immediate problem is at hand. The steady increase in pump prices can be halted and prices somewhat rolled back to a more acceptable level. Yet those Democrats who the people elected to Congress are turning their backs on the voters who sent them to Washington and coldly refusing to lift a finger to help the American people, preferring instead to lay the blame for the problem on big oil, speculators and every place but where it belongs. On themselves. If that doesn’t enrage you, nothing will. Payback time comes in November. Drive them out of office and elect people who will do what needs to be done. Drill, Drill, Drill! Are you listening, John McCain?” - Michael Reagan
FOR THE RECORD“Congressional attacks on speculation do not alter the oil market’s fundamental demand and supply conditions. What would lower the long-term price of oil is for Congress to permit exploration for the estimated billions upon billions of barrels of oil domestically available, not to mention the estimated trillion-plus barrels of shale oil in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. Some politicians pooh-pooh calls for drilling, saying it would take five or 10 years to recover the oil. I guarantee you we would begin to see a reduction in today’s prices even if it took five to 10 years for us to get the first barrel. Put yourself in the place of an OPEC member knowing there would be a greater supply of U.S. oil five or 10 years, hence maybe driving oil prices lower to say $40 a barrel. What will you want to do now while oil is $130 a barrel? You would want to sell as much oil now and OPEC’s collective efforts to do so would put downward pressures on current oil prices. Right now the U.S. Congress is OPEC’s staunchest ally.” - Walter Williams
POLITICAL FUTURES“To preserve Social Security and our economy, we need a three-pronged approach. First, it’s time to start raising the retirement age. Social Security started in 1935, and at that time slightly more than half of workers lived to reach the retirement age of 65. These days, though, life spans are much longer. Our government needs to encourage people to work longer or, at least, not tap their benefits at age 62. The best way to increase the retirement age would be to increase it over time (say two months per year until it reaches, say 68 ) and then index it for longevity after that. Next, lawmakers should ensure that Social Security and other entitlements only go to those who need help... Reducing payments to wealthy seniors would leave more available for lower income retirees. Finally, our government needs to shore up Social Security with personal retirement accounts. The concept is simple, and would work similarly to an IRA or 401(k). All workers would be able to invest a small percentage of their Social Security taxes in an account that they would own. The money would go into a few simple, low-cost investments that would grow over time, just as other retirement plans do. These accounts would not replace employer-sponsored retirement plans, but increase the ability of Social Security to pay benefits to them... Our country needs fundamental entitlement reform. And quickly - before the growing tide of retirees overwhelms our budget.” - Ed Feulner
THE GIPPER“Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us that they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They call their policy ‘accommodation.’ And they say if we only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, he will forget his evil ways and learn to love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers. They say we offer simple answers to complex problems. Well, perhaps there is a simple answer - not an easy one, but a simple one - if you and I have the courage to tell our elected officials that we want our national policy based upon what we know in our hearts is morally right... Every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face.” - Ronald Reagan
SELECT READER COMMENTS(Our servers automatically delete “Reply” messages to this e-mail. To submit or to view reader comments visit our Reader Comments page. Join the debate at the Patriot Blog.)
“Thank you very much for ’Obama, the national security neophyte.’ I’m saving a copy for future reference. But don’t you think ‘neophyte’ is a bit generous? My understanding of the word is that it refers to a new learner, and I haven’t seen any evidence that Obama is willing to learn at all.” - Vacaville, California
“It is absolutely frightening to think that a candidate as inexperienced as Obama could be the next President of the United States. If put into effect, Obama’s positions on national security would weaken the country immeasurably. McCain should put more emphasis on this critical issue since most voters are unaware of its importance and Obama’s lack of knowledge on the subject.” - Charlotte, North Carolina
“I love that portrait of Obama with that far away look, the martini, the cigarette, and all the other liberal nut-cases on the wall behind him. Is that available in dartboard size? I think you could make some money with it. Thanks for all your efforts, may God bless you and keep you online forever!” - Bakersfield, California
“When I first started receiving The Patriot Post, I was overwhelmed by the extent of the content. There is always so much! Then, I began to read it and have been astounded by the importance of every sentence. I love the quotes, I love the editorials, I love the information and I love how everything is based on the truth, beauty and goodness of America. Thank you for doing such important work.” - Batavia, Illinois
_____________________________