DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
• Facebook Apps
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
• Christian RSS Feeds
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Shop
• Christian Magazines
• Christian Book Store
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 23, 2024, 01:50:36 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
286803 Posts in 27568 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  ChristiansUnite Forums
|-+  ChristiansUnite and Announcements
| |-+  ChristiansUnite and Announcements (Moderator: admin)
| | |-+  Judicial Action Group has Mixed Reactions to John McCain on Judges
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Judicial Action Group has Mixed Reactions to John McCain on Judges  (Read 685 times)
nChrist
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 64256


May God Lead And Guide Us All


View Profile
« on: May 16, 2008, 01:04:11 PM »

Judicial Action Group has Mixed Reactions to John McCain on Judges

by Staff
May 15, 2008

BIRMINGHAM, Ala., (christiansunite.com) -- Judicial Action Group had mixed reactions to GOP Presidential candidate Senator John McCain and his speech yesterday outlining his judicial philosophy at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC.

JAG President Phillip Jauregui stated, "Senator McCain's speech was excellent in many respects, and there were a number of excellent points. The 'pros' far outnumbered the 'cons.' The 'cons' however were weighty and cannot be left unchecked.

"Senator McCain explained his vote for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg by saying 'I voted for [her because she was] qualified.' By Senator McCain's own standards presented in his speech, while Ginsburg was experienced, she was not qualified.

"There is a big difference between experience and qualification. In fact, it was Ginsburg's experience that made her unqualified. She was experienced at legislating from the bench, both as a federal judge for over ten years, and as an advocate for judicial supremacy at both the ACLU and NOW. No one should have been surprised that Justice Ginsburg has turned out to be a judicial supremacist. She was one before she joined the Court and remains one now. Her experience and record made her demonstrably unqualified to protect the same Constitution that she had spent years destroying.

"McCain also asserts that in response to supremacist judges who show little regard for the authority of the president, Congress, and states, the 'only remedy available to any of us is to find, nominate, and confirm better judges.'

"Senator McCain is simply incorrect on this monumental point." Jauregui referred to Stanford Law School Dean Larry Kramer, who wrote: "The Constitution leaves room for numerous responses to an overly assertive Court: Justices can be impeached, the Court's budget can be slashed, the President can ignore the Courts' illegal mandates, Congress can strip it of jurisdiction or shrink its size or pack it with new members or give it burdensome new responsibilities. The means are available, and have been used to great effect when necessary by some of the most admired Presidents and Congresses in American History."

"We applaud Senator McCain for his support of federal judges who will apply the U.S. Constitution. His characterization of the Court 'applying' rather than 'interpreting' is an extremely important distinction which we are working to help more people understand.

See the full response posted at www.JudicialActionGroup.com.

http://news.christiansunite.com/Religion_News/religion07185.shtml

Additional information on ChristiansUnite.com is available on the Internet at http://www.christiansunite.com/
Copyright © 2007 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
_______________________________
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media