Dutch Gov't Repudiates Koran Film
By Patrick Goodenough
CNSNews.com International Editor
March 28, 2008
(CNSNews.com) - Bracing for reaction, the Dutch government late Thursday distanced itself from a lawmaker's newly released film linking the Koran to violence and terrorism, saying the problem was "not religion, but the misuse of religion to sow hatred and intolerance."
Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, whose government earlier urged Geert Wilders not to release the provocative film, said he rejected its equation of Islam with violence. The film was posted on the Internet on Thursday (see related story).
"The vast majority of Muslims reject extremism and violence," Balkenende said in a statement read during a press conference. "In fact, the victims are often also Muslims.
"We therefore regret that Mr. Wilders has released this film. We believe it serves no purpose other than to cause offence. But feeling offended must never be used as an excuse for aggression and threats."
Wilders late last month accused the prime minister of cowardice, saying he appeared to be so fearful of the consequences of the film that was willing to capitulate, rather than defend democratic freedoms.
On Thursday, he conceded that Muslims may be unhappy with his film, and said he hoped it would not spark disturbances.
Radio Netherlands quoted him as saying the film was not intended to provoke disruption, but to make clear the dangers, and he hoped it would lead to debate in the Netherlands and elsewhere.
Wilders is the leader of the Freedom Party, a small right-wing party he formed in 2004 under the slogan "Stop the Islamization of the Netherlands." It holds nine seats in the 150-member Dutch parliament, the Tweede Kamer.
Wilders has lived with security protection since the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who was targeted for making a documentary about the treatment of women under Islam.
Dutch security officials this month raised the national risk level to "substantial" and Dutch embassies have been circulating statements on the government's view of the film, amid concerns about a possible backlash against Dutch nationals and business interests.
The Dutch Council of Churches Thursday called the film a "caricature" of Islam, and a Dutch lawyer, Els Lucas, lodged a legal complaint against Wilders, accusing him of inciting violence and discrimination. Lucas has in the past filed complaints against Wilders, charging that his stance on Islam violates Dutch law.
In a separate legal challenge, a Dutch court Friday is due to consider a petition, brought by the country's Islamic Federation before the film's release, asking whether the material breaches hate-speech laws.
Early reactions among Dutch Muslims to the film's release reportedly were muted.
When the film went online, it was late at night or early Friday morning in large parts of the Islamic world -- including Pakistan and Indonesia, where protests against the film took place earlier.
The Web sites of many major newspapers in the Middle East and South Asia were slow to pick up the story, although leading Arabic television networks al-Jazeera and al-Arabiya on their English-language sites carried wire service reports on the release of the film.
There was no immediate reaction from key Islamic bodies such as the Organization of the Islamic Conference, which has been leading a drive to have the "defamation" of Islam outlawed.
(Hours before the film was released, the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva passed a resolution, proposed by Islamic states, urging governments to prohibit the defamation of religions, and expressing "deep concern at attempts to identify Islam with terrorism, violence and human rights violations." The vote was 21-10, with European countries and Canada leading the opposition.)
Reaction may be forthcoming this weekend from the Arab League, which begins a summit in Damascus. Some key leaders are staying away because of Lebanon's drawn-out political crisis, but the Koran film's release could provide the participants with an issue to rally round.
The Arab European League (AEL), a Belgium-based party, accused Wilders of collaborating with "Zionists" to make the movie.
"His political agenda and his attacks against Islam and Muslims co[m]bined with his unconditional support to the Zionist project in occupied Palestine is welcomed and supported by the majority in the Zionist camp."
The AEL was founded in 2000 by a Lebanese-born political activist. Recent postings on its Web site praise the assassinated Hizballah terror chief Imad Mughniyah, and call last month's murder of eight Israeli religious students "a heroic attack," congratulating the "resistance martyrs" responsible.
'Unfair translation'
Comments by Muslims carried on the Islam Online Web site reacting to the film's release included accusations of Islamophobia, warnings of the fate awaiting "infidels," and allegations about "unfair" translations of the Koran used in the film.
Different translations of the Koran do differ slightly. For instance, one of the cited verses, 4: 56, is translated in the film as: "Those who have disbelieved our signs, we shall roast them in fire ..."
The same lines appear in different translations as:
-- "Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire." (Yusuf Ali)
-- "Lo! Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire." (Pickthal)
-- "(As for) those who disbelieve in Our communications, We shall make them enter fire." (Shakir)
Also, whereas the film's translation of 8:60 urges Muslims to "strike terror" into the hearts of Allah's enemies (the same words are used in Yusuf Ali's translation), others use verbs like "dismay" (Pickthal) or "frighten" (Shakir).
The film does not indicate what translation Wilders used.
Some Islamic scholars say that any translation of the Koran from the original Arabic is no longer the literal word of Allah.
Dutch Gov't Repudiates Koran Film