DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
• Facebook Apps
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
• Christian RSS Feeds
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Shop
• Christian Magazines
• Christian Book Store
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2024, 02:42:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
286806 Posts in 27568 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  ChristiansUnite Forums
|-+  Entertainment
| |-+  Computer Hardware and Software (Moderator: admin)
| | |-+  What Will Windows 7 Look Like?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: What Will Windows 7 Look Like?  (Read 2322 times)
Shammu
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 34862


B(asic) I(nstructions) B(efore) L(eaving) E(arth)


View Profile WWW
« on: July 29, 2007, 06:29:29 PM »

What Will Windows 7 Look Like?

Elizabeth Montalbano, IDG News Service Sat Jul 28, 10:00 AM ET

By now, everyone has heard how Microsoft Corp. plans to release the next Windows client OS, Windows 7, in 2010. But what the company is not making clear is what new features the OS will have, a topic that has become fodder for educated speculation.

Analysts said Microsoft probably is keeping tight-lipped about what Windows 7 will look like because at this point, company engineers and executives don't even know.

"They don't want to commit because they don't have a good idea what's in it," said Michael Silver, an analyst with Gartner Inc. "We're three years out, so you can't really expect that much detail."

Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, said with so many people still in the midst of upgrading to the latest client OS, Windows Vista, he's hesitant to speculate on what might be in the next OS. "We barely know the features of the one we just got," he said with a laugh.

That said, Cherry is expecting less "earth-shattering" new features than improvements on some of the new ones found in Windows Vista, such as the Bitlocker encryption feature, which is currently hard for the average PC user to navigate.

"You have to partition your hard drive and do a bunch of things, and you can only really today protect one drive, whereas many machines have more than one," he said.

Cherry also pointed to a common hardware performance problem many users face because of Vista's "very large footprint." "It's one of the things they might want to address-- hardware utilization and performance," he said. "It's hard to put a big wrapper around that; it just needs to be better."

One Microsoft executive gave a slight hint about what might turn up in Windows 7 earlier this year at the RSA Conference in San Francisco. Ben Fathi, corporate vice president of development with Microsoft's Windows Core Operating System Division, said in an interview that a "fundamental piece of enabling technology," such as a hypervisor or a drastic change in the user interface, would likely turn up in Windows 7.

Fathi also said at RSA in February that Microsoft was in the middle of the planning process for Windows 7's features and would know more over the next few months, which suggests the company now has a good idea what the OS will look like but is declining to disclose that information.

While both a hypervisor and a new user interface are possibilities for Windows 7, the former is almost a given, Gartner's Silver said. "It almost has to go" in the OS, he said, describing the technology as "a really thin OS" that manages virtual machines running on the system.

It would behoove Microsoft to put a hypervisor in Windows 7 because it would give them more control over the hardware the OS runs on, something the company would prefer to have, Silver said.

"The hypervisor really owns the hardware, and Microsoft likes owning the hardware and they want to be one of the people to standardize [hypervisor technology]," he said.

Vista includes new features such as desktop search and a new user interface, which also are two areas that leave room for expansion in Windows 7, analysts said.

Microsoft has shown the direction it's going with the latter with its Surface computer, introduced in late May. That form factor looks like a coffee table with a touchscreen interface that lets users move photos around by hand synchronize devices by placing them on the table.

With products such as the Apple iPhone making the touchscreen popular with consumers, a touchscreen UI in Windows 7 is a possibility, Silver said. "They don't want to look bad next to Apple," he said.

Desktop search, a new feature built into Vista, also has room for improvement. Microsoft has said it will link desktop search to Windows Server 2008 so desktop users can search not only for local files, but also for files on the server. This is a feature that potentially could be built into the desktop OS.

What Will Windows 7 Look Like?
Logged

nChrist
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 64256


May God Lead And Guide Us All


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2007, 04:38:00 AM »

I think that Microsoft already thinks they own your computer, just because there is a Microsoft Operating System on it. I've seen and read about all kinds of take over type actions that indicate Microsoft wants to be involved with every single thing done on a computer. It appears that privacy of any kind is a thing of the past, and they feel a need to watch over all of your activities. Read the new "E.U.L.A" agreements whenever you install even upgrades to older O.S. versions. Read it carefully and try to understand it. You are really agreeing up front to many things. If you don't read them carefully, you won't believe what you agreed to.

Some things might have good intentions, but the bottom line does mean that Microsoft owns your computer, and they will know what's done on it, private or not. There is NO PRIVACY except to non-Microsoft entities and I assume all of their affiliates. SO, that would mean that most of the world has access to look over your shoulder and watch everything you do. SO, I said goodbye to Microsoft, and I no longer care how slick it is or how well it works. However, their security is still terrible, but it is PRETTY.

I no longer care about PRETTY, and I'm in charge of my computer. I'll decide who gets to look at what's done on my computer, and Microsoft and the affiliates are excluded. Linux Ubuntu isn't nearly as slick or pretty, but the security is a thousand times better, and nobody is looking over your shoulder at everything done. Linux Ubuntu doesn't work as easy either, but it's extremely stable and works every time. I must also add that the large number of outstanding pieces of software that can be installed completely free IS IMPRESSIVE! There isn't any money involved, so Microsoft can't make a cent off of it.


In many ways, Linux Christian Ubuntu is much more simple in function and use than Microsoft. In other ways, some things on Linux are fairly difficult to do and require some practice. I don't care, and I've said goodbye to Microsoft. I don't regret it at all. I'll also be writing a second installment of my review that I promised. There are pros and cons to switching, but I refuse to be held hostage by Bill Gates and his cohorts. I'll take the cons, smile, and wave bye to Bill Gates and affiliates. I won't be spending big bucks for software ever again. It will either be completely free, pay for shipping, or costs representing just a tiny percentage of Microsoft products. They can keep their Big Brother, High Cost, Bloated, Unsafe SPYWARE. By the way, I'm not an "EL-CHEAPO DELUXE". I'll send donations to outstanding programmers with programs that I really like and use. This does not mean that I plan to send $600 to Open Office for their OUTSTANDING suite that replaces Microsoft completely. I might send them $30 to $50 for upgrades when the upgrades represent outstanding work, but never a demanded $300 to $500 just for an upgrade. I'll also get first class documentation, support, and a very active online community. This is just one example of many.

By the way, Linux Christian Ubuntu is also pretty slick, and it's FREE.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2007, 04:48:40 AM by blackeyedpeas » Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media