DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 28, 2024, 12:34:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
287030 Posts in 27572 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  ChristiansUnite Forums
|-+  Entertainment
| |-+  Politics and Political Issues (Moderator: admin)
| | |-+  Presbyterian Washington Office Defies General Assembly's Abortion Policy
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Presbyterian Washington Office Defies General Assembly's Abortion Policy  (Read 960 times)
Soldier4Christ
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 61166


One Nation Under God


View Profile
« on: April 27, 2007, 11:38:09 AM »

Presbyterian Washington Office Defies General Assembly's Abortion Policy

by Staff

WASHINGTON, (christiansunite.com) -- The Washington Office of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), which bills itself as "the voice of Presbyterian public policy," spoke its own thoughts yesterday, contrary to the late-term abortion policy established by the denomination's General Assembly. In its April 23 "Witness in Washington Weekly," the Washington Office reported that "Advocates of a woman's right to make the determination to carry a pregnancy to term or to end it, if necessary, have indicated that the decision [by the Supreme Court on partial-birth abortion] is vague and may cause confusion as it is written...."

The Washington Office chose to list several reasons why people would consider the decision flawed. At the same time, the Washington Office notably failed to report that the Supreme Court affirmation of the ban on partial-birth abortions actually accords with Presbyterian policy.

In 2006 General Assembly approved a statement that reads in part:

We affirm that the lives of viable unborn babies-those well-developed enough to survive outside the womb if delivered-ought to be preserved and cared for and not aborted. In cases where problems of life or health of the mother arise in a pregnancy, the church supports efforts to protect the life and health of both the mother and the baby. When late-term pregnancies must be terminated, we urge decisions intended to deliver the baby alive.

Jim Berkley, Director of IRD's Presbyterian Action Committee, commented:

"The Presbyterian Church maintains a rather mixed position on abortion--reluctantly allowing it on the one hand, but discouraging it and seeking to limit it on the other. But in terms of terminating late-term pregnancies, the most recent General Assembly resolution is clear: Choices need to be made that allow both babies and mothers to live.

"By no stretch of the imagination would partial-birth abortion fit within Presbyterian policy. It gruesomely destroys an all-but-delivered baby. The Supreme Court decision ought to be applauded by all Presbyterian entities, including the Washington Office, because it supports Presbyterian convictions about the sanctity of life.

"This is simply another instance of the Washington Office advocating its leaders' politics, rather than the policy of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). The Washington Office cannot be allowed to continue to resist the authority that constituted it and for which it is supposed to speak."

The Institute on Religion and Democracy, founded in 1981, is an ecumenical alliance of U.S. Christians working to reform their churches' social witness, in accord with biblical and historic Christian teachings, thereby contributing to the renewal of democratic society at home and abroad.
Logged

Joh 9:4  I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
Brother Jerry
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1627

I'm a llama!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2007, 11:58:16 AM »

Well now... if you had just stuck with your Bibles and what God had to say about the whole deal and how ANY form of abortion is murder in God's eyes then you would not have be to sitting here trying to battle it out with the definition of abortion and partial birth with the SC would you?!

I know many good folks of various denominations.  But it never fails that when you get a "governing body" over one you typically end up with denominational policies that are not in tune with what the Bible teaches.
Logged

Sincerely
Brother Jerry

------
I am like most fathers.  I, like most, want more for my children than I have.

I am unlike most fathers.  What I would like my children to have more of is crowns to lay at Jesus feet.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media