Muslim Demonstration

[Shammu]

Muslim Demonstration

Photographs show placard-bearing Muslim protesters in London.

Below I have enclosed pictures of Moslems who marched throughout the streets of London during their recent Religion of Peace Demonstration.

These pictures have never been shown in any of our American newspapers or television news programs because we should never appear to offend anyone!

More pictures to follow.

[Shammu]

[scarsm]Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems?![/scarsm]

It is time for people to wake up, and see there is a war going on...

[Soldier4Christ]

Didn't you know that these pictures were falsified by the conservative right. It is a means to validate their agenda for war. .............    Yeah ......  right ........  and they are the blind leading the blind. Yes brother we are at war. A war that these people do not understand nor want to understand.

[Shammu]

Didn't you know that these pictures were falsified by the conservative right. It is a means to validate their agenda for war. .............    Yeah ......  right ........  and they are the blind leading the blind. Yes brother we are at war. A war that these people do not understand nor want to understand.

Theres more pictures out there. It's if they want to believe the truth or not.

[Shammu]

From another webpage.

"QUESTION: Can a good Muslim be a good American?

That question was sent to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia.

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Koran, 2:256)

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Qu ran (Koran).

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Qu ran 4:34).

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Qu ran do not allow freedom of religion and _expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare "one nation under God," the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quean's 99 excellent names."

I won't copy the rest, but these are points to ponder.

[Soldier4Christ]

good Muslim

Can these two words actually go together?

[Shammu]

Can these two words actually go together?

What do you think..........











Course not brother.

[Shammu]

These pictures are shown in the movie OBSESSION: RADICAL ISLAM'S WAR AGAINST THE WEST. obsession the movie trailer2

[Kris777]

Muslim Demonstration

I don't think these people would like me to much.

Ya know, even though I know some Muslims are doing terrible things I still can't help but pray for them.  I want everyone to know the real God and to come to Him.  I need to practice on being bolder.  I have been struggling with witnessing and how to witness.  Have you guys ever felt like God is not using you enough?  Maybe it is just what I espect Him to do and not what He wants to do, but I have to admitt, just to admitt  I do feel sometimes frustrated with myself.  I feel that everyday is a struggle to do what is right.  I feel like  what I do isn't enough, which when you think of it nothing we do is ever enough.

[Soldier4Christ]

In that case it needs fixed.   

From another webpage.

"QUESTION: Can a good Muslim be a good American?

That question was sent to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia.

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Koran, 2:256)

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Qu ran (Koran).

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Qu ran 4:34).

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Qu ran do not allow freedom of religion and _expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare "one nation under God," the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quean's 99 excellent names."

I won't copy the rest, but these are points to ponder.

[Shammu]

In that case it needs fixed.   

[ibTina]

I am wondering when the muslims here in the USA will start to show their 'true' colors?!

[Soldier4Christ]

They already have been. The media has been doing a fair job of covering it up for them.

[Soldier4Christ]

While I normally hold no value in polls because of their nature to claim that this is the sentiment of all people when it is such a small sampling of people and polls are sometimes known to be rigged, I think that this one does prove that their are many that are blind to the truth.




Gallup: Many Americans Harbor Strong Bias Against U.S. Muslims


NEW YORK A new Gallup poll finds that many Americans -- what it calls "substantial minorities" -- harbor "negative feelings or prejudices against people of the Muslim faith" in this country. Nearly one in four Americans, 22%, say they would not like to have a Muslim as a neighbor.

While Americans tend to disagree with the notion that Muslims living in the United States are sympathetic to al-Qaeda, a significant 34% believe they do back al-Qaeda. And fewer than half -- 49% -- believe U.S. Muslims are loyal to the United States.

Almost four in ten, 39%, advocate that Muslims here should carry special I.D. That same number admit that they do hold some "prejudice" against Muslims. Forty-four percent say their religious views are too "extreme."

In every case, Americans who actually know any Muslims are more sympathethic.

The poll was taken at the end of July and surveyed 1,007 adult Americans.

[Soldier4Christ]

Today's media: Blind to the obvious


"As bats' eyes are to daylight," wrote Aristotle, "so is our intellectual eye blind to those truths that are most obvious of all."

He was writing about the savants of Athens in the fourth century before Christ, but he was also writing about the savants of the Western world in the 21st century after Christ. How many innocent civilians will have to be killed in the name of Allah, you wonder, before our savants realize that what we're involved in is a religious war?

Quite a few more, judging from the Canadian liberal media's coverage this week of the Muslim plot to suicide-bomb some 10 trans-Atlantic airliners.

Typically, the Globe and Mail, which regards itself as Canada's New York Times, spread its coverage across five full pages and parts of four more, without mentioning the word "Muslim" more than four times.

Moreover, along with the rest of the liberal media, the Globe has invented the adjective "Islamist" to distinguish those who favor indiscriminate murder in the name of God from the merely "Islamic" who presumably don't.

Globe columnists, completely in accord, remain rooted in the politically correct thinking and assumptions of the '60s. "The Good Guys Will Win This War, Too," says the headline on a column by John Ibbitson. "Chronic wars last a very long time," he writes, "but they do end. Twenty years ago, no one would have predicted the end of the Cold War, [or] the end of apartheid. But they're in the past, and the good guys won."

Note the assumption: Both the Cold War and South Africa's apartheid lasted about 50 years – to Mr. Ibbitson, "a very long time." The war between Islam and the West has lasted 1,400 years so far. Doesn't he know this? Not really. He has unconsciously bought into the delusion of his generation that the only history that matters began about 1960.

Even more deluded is Globe columnist Rick Salutin, an ex-communist whose perceptions are frequently insightful. Not this time. He doesn't see "a primary religious component" even in Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden's is "not a religious war that will outlast our lifetime," for he only "speaks as an infuriated member of the [Middle East] region." Apparently, we are to ignore bin Laden's interminable calls for a "jihad" against "the Jewish and Christian Crusaders," and his declaration after the "triumph" of 9-11, when he vowed: "There will never be another Andalusia." His reference was to the Muslim loss of Spain, only recovered by the Christians 500 years ago, after an 800-year war.

Salutin cannot believe that bin Laden could think this way, because Salutin himself can't; anything that happened before the '60s doesn't matter. To bin Laden – and many others – it does.

"The word 'peace' has gone out of fashion," Globe columnist Lawrence Martin chimes in. "It was a word on everybody's lips in the baby boomers' generation. But new youth and new politicians don't seem to be into it. Today's prevailing ethic is confrontation, and the old values of negotiation and conciliation are missing."

Again, note the assumption: The "values" of the '70s and '80s are "the old values." To the obvious fact that those relatively peaceful times were conferred upon us by people who fought two horrible world wars, followed by a Cold War that we won by remaining fully confrontational and fully armed, he is as blind as Aristotle said.

But this disability is not confined to the media. How many professors of religious studies have for years indoctrinated their students with the vision of Islam as a wholly peace-loving religion, ignoring a) what Muhammad taught, b) what Muhammad did, c) what the early caliphs did and d) what Muslim nations have done or tried to do ever since?

In the Globe's rival, the National Post, however, there appeared one story much at odds with the general Canadian coverage. It reported, and deplored, the comment of London Mayor Ken Livingstone that "no community in London can or should be targeted or blamed because of the actions of people who are pure criminals." It would be "outrageous," a senior police officer had added, "to suggest that the fault lay with Islam, a peace-loving religion that utterly rejected wanton killing." But this, the article added, ignored the fact that the terrorists "perpetrated their missions as Muslims, were inspired by the Prophet, were justified by the Quran and acted in the name of Islam."

That story was reprinted from the London Telegraph, where the blind apparently have begun to see.