Is it reasonable to say since God is the rewarder of those who seek him and cuttsoff the wicked and blesses the righteous that even though evil will be present the spiritual and cultural effects of the work of the cross will prevail in history?The work of the crfoss is iether greater or lesser than the fall of Adam...What do you say?
It IS reasonable and true to say God is THE rewarder and punisher of the righteous and wicked. The work of the cross is finished and the has prevailed. However, the work in us is not complete, nor have all that will repented as yet repented. Peter states that God is not slack concerning his promise but long suffering, not willing that ANY should perish but all come to repentance. And Paul makes this interesting comment that the work is yet to be fullfilled:
1 Cor 15
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
Death has yet to be vanquish, 'katargeo' Gr. put to nought, although it cannot prevail, it has "lost it's sting".---
Undefined terms are meaningless. You used 'soon and very soon' to convey some idea. What was that idea in real terms ?
I agree, and the ambiguity of "soon and very soon" is meaningless, it is only to prompt some interest, perhaps self questioning, "could this happen in my lifetime, and if so, should I study this in the bible?" Still the word soon, incorporates a more compressed period of time.
---
This describes every Roman Emporer as well as many other despots of the biblical era
TRUE, but Rome cannot claim the last emperor. Daniel's prophetic book clearly elaborates, 5 Kingdoms, Babylon, Mede/Persian, Greek, Roman, Quasi-Rome/?? (iron/clay)
---
There has been no prophecy of return to the land since the Babylonian captivity. And in this case repentence in the land of capitivty was required before restoration.
There are prophecies of their return and their repentance. Paul asks rhetorically, "Hath God cast away his people?" and then answers "God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew." again he says this "Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.", (wherever they may be) . Today as well there are thousands all over this country and in Israel, worshipping Messiah, Yeshua. And these beautiful versus explain:
Romans 11:7-12
What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day. And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompense unto them: Let their eyes be darkened that they may not see, and bow down their back alway. I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?The repentance of the Jew is the fullness of the plan that we are all one in Christ. He has torn down the middle wall of partition.
IKing 8:47-48
47 Yet if they shall bethink themselves in the land whither they were carried captives, and repent, and make supplication unto thee in the land of them that carried them captives, saying, We have sinned, and have done perversely, we have committed wickedness;
48 And so return unto thee with all their heart, and with all their soul, in the land of their enemies, which led them away captive, and pray unto thee toward their land, which thou gavest unto their fathers, the city which thou hast chosen, and the house which I have built for thy name:
(KJV)
Just because you think they are in their State, declared in 1948, and have recaptured Jerusalem (1967) without what you call repentance, does not negate the work Jesus himself is doing with those Messianic converts. This remnant cannot be discarded, or brushed away. At times scripture verse is fulfilled partially in time. Example:
Isaiah 61:1,2
61:1 The spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
Luke 4:18 Is a partial fulfillment, in that Is 61:2b has yet to be done, the VENGEANCE OF OUR GOD, and to (finally) comfort ALL who mourn.
---
This pattern is also used by Jery:
Jer 29:12-14
12 Then shall ye call upon me, and ye shall go and pray unto me, and I will hearken unto you.
13 And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.
14 And I will be found of you, saith the LORD: and I will turn away your captivity, and I will gather you from all the nations, and from all the places whither I have driven you, saith the LORD; and I will bring you again into the place whence I caused you to be carried away captive.
(KJV)
These things have long since happened ,but the pattern is clear. Repentance before restoration
Modern Israel is not repentant. And as an antichristian state has no claims whatever to God's blessings.
The peace process, Iraq war, and more to come are all implements of the rise to power of the person, that is alive today.[/color]
Well what Scripture says this? What Scripture mentions a realitively small war to take place in Iraq thousands of years future ,from the point of the prophecy?
This looks so familiar.
If we read of war the prophecy mongers come out shouting the end is near.. and they never define near ...
If we read of peace the prophecy mongers come out shouting the end is near...
With only what is on this thread its easy enough to see your conclusions are a rehash of Walvoord's expectations expressed in Armageddon Oil and the Middle East Crisisin 1974. Which failed to come to pass, not once but twice with the 1990 revision and reprint.( I m not saying you took your ideas from that work, but obviously you have heard and read enough of a similar nature and have been influenced by them) The only problem being that in every case in all history, short term expectations, which yours certainly is, based on futuristic outlooks have been proven wrong. And a common factor is the 'it couldnt have been then it must be now'...fill in the blank reasoning.