Yes, I know. This is the frequent refrain used to justify many governments, including the coming global one, on many different levels.
I know this is a slippery slope but not everything that looks like a New World Order is of the NWO. Not that a little paranoia is a bad thing.

But it's answer--that is, "social programs", by necessity, or by definition, implies coercion. I.e., how do we finance these programs? Revenues. How do we finance revenues? Taxes. How do we collect taxes? Yes, the IRS tells us ours is a voluntary tax system.
I agree if we were living in a God fearing country, but unfortunately those days are behind us, so lets tax the godless capitalists to death.

I would prefer a graduated income tax, something where if you make over a million a year you pay 90% in taxes with no loop holes. (No one needs that much money) But unfortunately I am not in charge.

The quote on this topic I've heard goes something like this:
"A liberal is someone who gives away other peoples' money.
"A conservative is someone who gives away his own money."
Actually that quote goes....
A liberal is someone who gives away other peoples' money.
A conservative is some who doesn't give away his own money.
... and there lies the problem. If we went back to the system of relying on cheerful givers we would not get near enough money coming in.
In light of the season it should be mentioned that Ebenezer Scrooge was a conservative.
