there's no question the bill is badly worded
It was supposed to targed those dumb same-sex "marriages" but it does seem that thru LIEberal pc-idiocity it looks like it bars civil ceremonies too
But that doesn't sound all that bad to me either
Hello Sly Fandango,
YES, they intentionally included bars to civil unions and civil ceremonies, so their wording was designed to prevent ANY legal status for same-sex unions. There is a quite logical and legal reason for the wording. I don't understand why you would say that the wording is "Liberal pc-idiocity". It would seem to be the opposite, about as conservative as one could get. A civil union here is one step below marriage, and it does have a legal status unless there is legislation barring it.
Tom