Who is the Biggest enemy in the world?

[Tim Vaughan]

Jews of Eastern European decent, and influenced by followers of Trotsky. People like Wolfowitz, etc.. Strauss is another name you hear, although he was from central Europe.  Here are some links

Compared to other U.S. conservatives, neoconservatives are characterized by an aggressive stance on foreign policy, a lesser social conservatism, and lesser dedication to a policy of minimal government. The "newness" refers either to being new to American conservatism (often coming from liberal or socialist backgrounds) or to being part of a "new wave" of conservative thought and political organization.

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Neoconservatism-(United-States)

Neoconservatism refers to the political goals and ideology of the "new conservatives" in the United States, characterized by hawkish views on foreign policy and a lesser emphasis on social issues and minimal government than other strains of American conservatism. The "newness" refers either to being new to American conservatism (often coming from liberal or socialist backgrounds) or to being part of a "new wave" of conservative thought and political organization. In both meanings the term is sometimes used pejoratively. This criticism has grown due to the increased controversy over an alleged major neoconservative initiative, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

More specifically, the term refers to journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and institutions affiliated with policy think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard. The neoconservatives, often dubbed the neocons by supporters and critics alike, are credited with (or blamed for) influencing U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and George W. Bush (2001-present).

http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/N/Neoconservatism-(United-States).htm

By the way, how much diversity does Israel practice, a country in which the political-military class not only excludes Christians and Muslims but also is predominantly made up of Eastern European Jews – who are a minority of the country? Needless to say, all this is the business of Israelis, and for all I know, they may be right to do as they are doing. But neocons should not lie by depicting Israel as a polity that resembles what the US has now (sadly) become.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/gottfried/gottfried47.html

The last quote is from Paul Godfreid, the most intelligent of the Jewish commentators out there. No one with even a smattering of current politics is unaware of this.

[Marv]

Hi,

I agree that the neocons are a great peril, their worldview of the imperial US standing over all the world is quite scary.  For instance, you hear all the time that the US is the world's only superpower.  Well Communist China could potentially put an army of about 350,000,000 fighting men in the field.  In addition, they have WMD.  The neocon view of China would say that we must dominate them militarily, not through negotiation or capitulation.  

This is of great concern to me, because there is no way to bring about the neocon world view without taking my children.

Far from being Christian, the neocons seem to take their worldview from Herbert W. Armstrong.  The US is God's chosen (Armstrong said the US and Britain were lost tribes of Israel) country, that our government is so good, so universal, it is our mission to take over the world.

As God's chosen, they don't think they can loose.  That's part of what makes Bush's supposed statement that we could go into Iraq without casualties believable.

Marv

[Tim Vaughan]

Thanks, Marv, someone who's been reading.

[artputey]

Is there a special school that crazy conpsiracy people got to?

[Symphony]

The biggest enemy in the world is the world.

Ourselves.

My biggest enemy is me.

[Tim Vaughan]

Is there a special school that crazy conpsiracy people got to?

Yes, they are taught that Saddam had WMD and was involved in 9/11, and they are taught that the neocons have no influence on US foreign policy.

[Kalthzar]

Umm question, how do you realize that your not crazy? As in Accept it?

[Tim Vaughan]

Symphony makes a very good point. As James says, don't blame wars and strife on the Devil, they come from the human heart.

[Symphony]

Outside of Satan, the biggest threat to the world today are the neocons, a group of a few dozen people, mostly of Eastern Jewish Trotskyite background who are running American foreign policy. They are socially liberal, e.g. they are in favor of large scale third world immigration, abortion, etc..and have a particular hatred of traditional American Christian conservatives, e.g. their attack on Trent Lott when he praised Strom Thurmond.

To learn more about them, you can use keywords like "architect" "Iraq" "war" at google.

also,

There was an early split in the ranks of top Communists. Stalin one the one hand wanted to consolidate the winnings of the movement, and the Jewish Trotsky wanted to expand the Revolution until it took over everything. Stalin won, had Trotsky murdered, but some of his disciples became active in the US. This is the reason that we are engaged in "nation building" right now in the Mideast, it is part of the Trotskyite philosophy of violently forcing others to accept your political system.    
 
That's interesting.  The Jews in the last 100 years or so, it seems have had a definite liberal bent - to wit, betraying their brethren in Germany in the Holocaust?  

I thot perhaps it was more than a handfull.  Isn't the former Israelii Prime Minister (Perez?) pretty liberal, willing to trade West Bank soil for concessions, etc.

But anyway, isn't American nation-building larger than just a Jewish picture?   Just our insatiable appetite for oil, and the stupid fact we've failed to deal with our own foreign dependency now for 30 years -   - would seem to dictate a very vested interested in protecting foreign oil, or an ally near that oil(Israel)?

But you're calling them neocons - would they really be 'conservative'.  I'd tend to see them as extreme liberals - the socialist Jew, or communist, etc.

But I agree that the neocon type your are profiling would certianly seem to be the type of mold for an antichrist - that's exactly what your description would imply - anti-Christ.  Or, anti - anything, just about, it would seem.

[Tim Vaughan]

Thanks for your thoughfulness. If you permit, I will wait until tomorrow to anwer you.