nChrist
|
 |
« on: July 15, 2019, 01:23:34 AM » |
|
_______________________________________________ More Minutes With The Bible From The Berean Bible Society
Free Email Subscription
For Questions Or Comments: berean@execpc.com _______________________________________________
Tradition: How Shall We Regard It? by Pastor Cornelius R. Stam
Many sincere believers have a vague idea that tradition is always wrong. They suppose that tradition in itself is contrary to the Word of God. Others lean heavily on tradition. Indeed, the great majority of Christians probably lean more heavily on tradition than on the Bible itself.
We received a letter some time ago from an advocate of a religious practice which is all but universal in Christendom. He wrote: “It has been the regular practice of the Church for centuries of time. Is it possible that the Church has been wrong all this time?” Our answer is--certainly it is possible that the Church has been wrong all this time. Man can always be wrong--and generally is!
Can the Church be wrong? Look at the sad history of Israel, God’s covenant people! And shall we say that we are less prone to err? Can we claim that the Church under grace has done better than Israel under the Law? Not one whit. The history of the Church in this age of Grace does not make any better reading than the history of Israel as recorded in the Old Testament Scriptures. Whatever may be the virtues or vices of tradition, let us put it down as a fixed principle never to depend on man--not even the Church. We can depend only upon the written Word of God.
TRADITIONS TRUE AND FALSE
The word tradition merely means that which is handed down from one to another. It is not necessarily false.
In I Corinthians 11:2 Paul writes: “Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances (Gr. paradosis, traditions), as I delivered them to you.”
In this case what Paul had handed down to the Corinthians was most assuredly true, for he had received it by divine revelation. Concerning the Lord’s supper he says: “FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD that which also I delivered unto you” (I Cor. 11:23), and a few chapters farther he says again: “For I delivered unto you first of all THAT WHICH I ALSO RECEIVED” (I Cor. 15:3).
Twice in his second letter to the Thessalonians he emphasizes the importance of these traditions.
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle” (II Thes. 2:15).
“Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us” (II Thes. 3:6).
But let us not forget that Paul was chosen of God to proclaim a particular message some years before the Scriptures were completed. Notice carefully that he does not instruct his readers to follow tradition in general, nor even the traditions of any particular group. He speaks only of that which he had himself received by revelation to proclaim to them.
Those traditions were, of course, absolutely dependable, but the Scriptures have since been completed. No man today can say “Thus saith the Lord,” unless he quotes the written Word of God. Therefore human traditions, as such, are wholly unreliable. They may be true or they may be false.
THE DANGERS OF TRADITION
Because some traditions are true men soon confuse tradition with revelation and begin to depend on it. Since God uses men to proclaim His Word we are prone to confuse the words of men with the Word of God. Tradition is the more dangerous because it is not necessarily false.
Error when mixed with truth is the more difficult to discern. Furthermore, our adversary often uses personalities to lead sincere believers into error. Dr. So-and-so’s hearers know him as a godly man. They cannot believe that he would preach anything but the truth and accept all he says in simple faith! But this is a perilous mistake.
The very best of men are only men at the very best. Even the most godly men fail. They fail even in handing down the Word of God to their hearers, and so the truth is corrupted. Let us illustrate:
Suppose my computer printer is down and I decide to type out twelve copies of the eighth chapter of Romans on my old typewriter. How should I go about it? Suppose I make the first copy, then copy the second from the first, the third from the second, the fourth from the third and so on to the twelfth.
Do you see the danger? If I should make an error in the second copy there is the danger of repeating that error in every successive copy--and the more such an error may seem to be correct, the greater the danger. If I make two more errors in the fourth copy, one in the fifth and another in the seventh, the errors will multiply and the last copy may well contain them all! The correct way would be to make all twelve copies from the original. So it is with the Word of God.
Men, even godly men, err and their errors are transmitted from generation to generation. Almost every time another error arises it is passed on to following generations; as a result, almost every imaginable heresy is taught in the name of Christ. That is the extreme danger of depending on tradition.
Therefore, even if our fathers copied from their fathers, let us not copy from our fathers. Or, to put it another way--even if our spiritual leaders copied from their spiritual leaders, let us not copy from our spiritual leaders. Let us go to the original--to the Word of God itself and be safe. Before Paul was saved he made much of the traditions of the fathers. He says in Galatians 1:14:
“And I profited in the Jews’ religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.”
But with all this tradition behind him he still did not recognize his own Messiah; indeed, he became His greatest enemy on earth. And Paul was not the only one thus blinded by false traditions. Some years after his conversion he wrote to the Romans:
“Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
“For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
“For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God” (Rom. 10:1-3).
They were so steeped in tradition that they could not see anything else. This casts light on Peter’s statement to the believing Jews of his day:
“Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things such as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers,
“But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot” (I Pet. 1:18,19).
If Paul had continued in the traditions of his fathers he would have been lost. If these Jewish believers had continued in the traditions of their fathers they would all have been lost, as the nation was. What peril there is in following tradition! What multitudes have been lost because they depended upon tradition instead of the Word of God!
OUR LORD AND TRADITION
The Lord Jesus was hated and persecuted for openly opposing the traditions of the Pharisees. However, His answers to them were most significant. When the Pharisees came from Jerusalem and found the disciples eating with “unwashen” hands, “they found fault” (Mark 7:2).
“For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders.
“And when they come from the market, except they wash [Gr. baptizo, baptize] they eat not. And many other things there be which they have received to hold, as the washing [Gr. baptismos, baptism] of cups, and pots, brazen vessels, and of tables.
“Then the Pharisees and scribes asked Him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashen hands?” (Mark 7:3-5).
|