nChrist
|
 |
« on: February 27, 2018, 06:03:42 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 2-27-2018 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest Feb. 27, 2018 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/54418-mid-day-digest
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Dems’ gun-grabbing efforts are nothing new, but this one goes further than most. By severing ties with the NRA, companies are boycotting their own customers. The Supreme Courts deferred action on DACA changes very little. China’s Xi Jingping makes a critical move to grab power for life. Steel tariffs could undermine America’s oil-production boom. Plus our Daily Features: Top Headlines, Memes, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” —Cesare Beccaria
IN BRIEF
Dems: Hey, Let’s Ban All Semi-Automatics1
By Thomas Gallatin
Democrats have always hated the Second Amendment. When they were the party of slavery and Jim Crow, they invented gun control to keep firearms out of the hands of blacks2. Over the past few decades, as Democrats have increasingly moved hard left, the party’s position on the Second Amendment has become less about race than an ever-growing vitriolic anti-gun animosity. Once again, exploiting the recent Parkland atrocity3, Democrats are going all-in by declaring themselves the party for “banning guns.”
On Monday, 156 House Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) introduced their latest anti-gun measure. The legislation, dressed up with the faulty language of “assault weapons” and “weapons of war,” was marketed as “sensible policy.” Of course, Democrat “common sense” is a non sequitur4. In introducing the bill, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) insisted, “Assault weapons were made for one purpose. They are designed to kill as many people as possible in a short amount of time. They do not belong in our communities.”
While Democrats’ gun-grabbing efforts are nothing new5, this bill, far from being “sensible,” would essentially ban all semi-automatic firearms. The Washington Examiner reports6, “The bill prohibits the ‘sale, transfer, production, and importation’ of semi-automatic rifles and pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic rifles with a magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds. Additionally, the legislation bans the sale, transfer, production, and importation of semi-automatic shotguns with features such as a pistol grip or detachable stock, and ammunition feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds.”
Democrats and their cohorts in the mainstream media seek to demonize7 firearms and individual gun ownership rights, banking on the further polarization of the issue helping their election chances come November. Democrats know their bill won’t see any vote, but they aim to make “sensible gun control” an election issue for their campaign. And should another mass attack occur at another school or similar “gun-free zone” before the November elections, Democrats will be quick to point out how they are the only ones serious about “solving” the problem. However, the issue is so polarizing that it may prove to backfire against Democrats, as many Americans see this for what it is — a direct attack on Americans’ constitutional rights. Needless to say, it appears that Democrats are eager to take the political gamble.
The Supreme Court’s Deferred Action for ‘Dreamers’8
Back in September, President Donald Trump moved to rescind9 Barack Obama’s unconstitutional order to bypass Congress and enact the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Trump even gave Congress six months to act, while negotiating with Democrats on immigration reform that included legalizing so-called “Dreamers,” the illegal alien children affected by DACA. Instead, Democrats shut down the government last month over it — a battle they lost10. Democrats don’t want a deal, they want a campaign issue, though they’re overplaying their hand11.
Meanwhile, legal challenges have continued. On Monday, the Supreme Court declined the Justice Department’s request to intervene, leaving the issue to be decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which previously blocked Trump’s March 5 deadline for ending DACA. That means the 700,000 people in the program can continue applying for work-permit renewals indefinitely, though no new applicants must be accepted. Legally, Trump has an open and shut case — except for the judicial despots occupying the Ninth Circuit. Without a deadline, however, even congressional Republicans have little motivation to settle the matter with an actual bill.
The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro aptly sums up12 where things stand: “So, what’s changed? Not much. The media will be able to claim that Trump lost in court; Trump will be able to avoid beginning deportations, and blame the courts for it. While the media champion this ruling as a loss for Trump, on a political level, Trump didn’t lose anything at all.”
In related news, it appears Democrat Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf committed a federal felony13 by warning illegal aliens in her city of upcoming ICE raids. Let’s see if she faces any consequences.
Top Headlines14
Broward sheriff received at least 45 calls about Florida shooter’s family, not 23 (Washington Examiner15)
Study: TV gun violence on PG, TV-14 shows increased since Newtown shooting (CNS News16)
Media, gun control groups exaggerate NRA donations to Republicans (The Washington Free Beacon17)
Georgia Republicans refuse to restore Delta tax breaks over company’s dumping the NRA (The Resurgent18.)
Lawsuit: 100,000 noncitizen registered to vote in Pennsylvania (The Washington Times19)
USDA: 35,891 retailers engaged in food stamp fraud (CNS News20)
Six key exchanges from major union case at the Supreme Court (The Daily Signal21)
Twenty states sue federal government, seeking end to ObamaCare (Reuters22)
Elizabeth Warren’s stealth campaign to overcome her “Pocahontas” problem (Hot Air23)
Humor: Trump awards self Medal of Honor for hypothetically saving everyone during school shooting (Duffel Blog24)
Policy: The real problem with federal spending remains entitlements (City Journal25)
Policy: Want to help students? Let’s change how we subsidize education (Manhattan Institute26)
For more of today’s news, visit Patriot Headline Report27.
FEATURED ANALYSIS Marketing on the Blood of Innocents7
By Nate Jackson
The horrific mass murder at Marjory Stoneman High School3 in Parkland, Florida, almost two weeks ago elicited the same calls for gun control that we expect after every such incident. Leftists rush to blame the tool and law-abiding citizens instead of the cultural cesspool28 they themselves have cultivated. The National Rifle Association is always a leftist target, though this time the rate of fire has increased, and it’s yielding some results that will affect NRA members.
Dozens of companies offer partnership discounts to the NRA’s five million members — and many of those companies are caving to leftist pressure by cutting those ties. Allied Van Lines, Avis Budget Group, Chubb, Delta Air Lines, Enterprise (including Alamo and National Car Rental), First National Bank of Omaha, Hertz, Metlife, North American Van Lines, Paramount Rx, SimpliSafe, Starkey Hearing, Symantec, TrueCare and United Continental all announced within the last few days that they are discontinuing NRA discount or affiliate programs. More may follow in the near future. On the other hand, FedEx announced29 it will not succumb to the #Resistance … albeit while calling for a ban on semi-automatic rifles30.
Make no mistake: These companies think they’re serving their own bottom line.
For perspective, here’s list of companies31 that have no trouble donating to Planned Parenthood, which kills more than 300,000 children every year.
As for the NRA, the panicked herd of companies stampeding for the exits was spooked by an organized leftist campaign of hate. These anti-gun activists and their fired up base of social media screamers want to pin responsibility for the blood of children on the NRA, its members, politicians who are on its side, and any company that has any relationship to the nearly 150-year-old firearms organization.
“Customer feedback has caused us to review our relationship with the NRA,” First National Bank of Omaha said. “As a result, First National Bank of Omaha will not renew its contract with the National Rifle Association to issue the NRA Visa Card.”
Translation: They got an earful from angry people who either have an anti-gun agenda or don’t know what else to do with their rage over the deaths of 17 innocent people in Florida.
|