nChrist
|
 |
« on: November 03, 2017, 04:56:58 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 11-3-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
The Patriot Post® · Mid-Day Digest
Nov. 3, 2017 · https://patriotpost.us/digests/52236
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Of course the fix was in on behalf of Hillary Clinton. Brazile’s “scoop” isn’t a surprise. Why are Papa John’s pizza sales down? Its founder blames the NFL. The House GOP released its tax reform plan, and there are a lot of changes. It turns out the best way to combat the opioid epidemic is to repair broken families. Will there soon be three Californias? Don’t count it, but some people are trying. Plus our Daily Features: Top Headlines, Memes, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“The accumulation of all powers … in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” —James Madison (1788.)
IN BRIEF
Brazile Admits the Clinton Fix Was In1
By Thomas Gallatin
In what many are describing as a “bombshell” revelation, Donna Brazile, former interim head of the Democratic National Committee, has admitted what we actually knew last July2 — that the DNC rigged the nomination processes to ensure that Hillary Clinton defeated upstart Bernie Sanders. Brazile wrote in a Politico article3 Thursday, “I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process. … By Sept. 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart.”
Democrat darling and favorite American Indian Sen. Elizabeth Warren also said she believes the nomination was rigged: “Yes, I think it was. What we have to focus on now as Democrats is, we recognize the process was rigged.” She continued, “And now it is up to Democrats to build a new process, a process that really works and works for everyone.”
Hold on a minute. Haven’t Democrats and the Left been screaming and moaning for the past year that the election was stolen from Hillary? America has endured months of Demo/MSM insistence of a phony Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy that supposedly swung the election to Donald Trump. And then there’s the oft-repeated refrain that Hillary deserved to be president because she won the popular vote, followed by calls to abolish the electoral college. Over and over again, the message has been how unfair the system was toward Hillary and that Trump needs to be resisted with the goal of eventually impeaching him.
Now, suddenly Democrats are turning on Clinton. To borrow a phrase from a certain book title, what happened? It’s certainly not new news that the DNC rigged the nomination process to ensure Clinton was the nominee. Again, we’ve known this for well over a year. It’s the reason that former DNC chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced to resign. So after 25 years of Clinton corruption4, why are Democrats only now throwing Hillary under the bus?
First, the corruption waters surrounding Hillary are getting too hot for comfort. We learned last week that the Clinton campaign paid for the infamous dossier5 that started the whole Russia collusion narrative. And it was revealed just yesterday that Team Hillary paid $168,0006 to produce it. Like we have been saying for months, the Mueller investigation may turn against Democrats. And if they don’t have “Trump colluded with Russia” to assuage their Trump Derangement Syndrome, they’ve got nothing.
Second, after 18 months of trashing Trump, the Democrat Party’s approval rating7 is no better than his, which doesn’t bode well for its mid-term election hopes. Democrats are seen by an increasing number of Americans as a party of the extreme Left and not the mainstream.
So, it appears that since Clinton not only lost the election but blew up the narrative of how she was cheated out of it, Democrats are no longer willing8 to put up with her lying and corruption.
On an interesting and yet not surprising side note, the big three major news networks didn’t even bother to cover9 Brazile’s accusation in their newscasts last night. Heads in the sand?
Papa John’s Unappetizing Ingredient: The NFL10
By Jordan Candler
The proliferation of national anthem protests in the NFL has culminated in falling television ratings and a shrunken fan base. But the political theater on display by athletes has repercussions beyond the field. For seven years, Papa John’s has branded itself around being recognized as the NFL’s official pizza sponsor. That was obviously a boon for business. At least until now.
Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter has revealed that business is sluggish due to fallout over his company’s ties to the NFL. He minced no words, either, reportedly complaining, “The NFL has hurt us by not resolving the current debacle to the players’ and owners’ satisfaction. NFL leadership has hurt Papa John’s shareholders.” He added, “Leadership starts at the top, and this is an example of poor leadership.” From Schnatter’s standpoint, “This should have been nipped in the bud a year and a half ago.”
According to Bloomberg11, “Back in 2014, when Papa John’s posted a nearly 10 percent gain in North American same-store sales, the company credited its close relationship with the NFL and [Peyton] Manning for driving its business in the U.S. On Wednesday, the tone was quite different. Papa John’s post-earnings conference call was dominated by negative talk of the NFL. The league’s name came up 44 times during the discussion, compared with 12 mentions in the year-earlier call.”
The NFL fallout affects Papa John’s in terms of less exposure (not as many eyeballs are seeing ads). And a dwindling base translates into fewer orders. One also could assume that some fans are so fed up with the politics of the NFL that they are boycotting the companies associated with it as well. Of course, Papa John’s is free to take sponsorships elsewhere, and it may come to that. But its lackluster sales are yet more proof that the NFL opened a can of worms when it neglected to quickly and effectively diffuse the situation.
Top Headlines12
The U.S. economy added 261,000 jobs in October in rebound from hurricanes (CNBC13)
GOP’s tax bill cancels $23 billion in credits claimed by illegal immigrants (The Washington Times14)
Mueller focused on Tony Podesta and a former GOP congressman (Associated Press15)
Team Clinton paid $168,000 for Trump dossier (Reuters16)
The real scandal of the declassified Osama bin Laden trove implicates Obama and the CIA (Washington Examiner17)
Trump names Jerome Powell as Fed chair (CNS News18.)
Antifa apocalypse? Anarchist group’s plan to overthrow Trump ‘regime’ starts Saturday (Fox News19)
Democrat Northam campaign coordinated with Latino Victory Fund on race-baiting20 anti-Gillespie ad (National Review21)
Twitter employee “deactivated” Trump account on last day (BBC22)
Humor: In response to mounting criticism, President Trump comes out as gay (The Babylon Bee23)
Policy: Asia trip a chance for Trump to set things right (The Heritage Foundation24)
Policy: Sustainable tax reform requires taming entitlements (National Review25)
For more of today’s news, visit Patriot Headline Report26.
FEATURED ANALYSIS ‘Cuts Cuts Cuts’ for Everyone?27
By Michael Swartz
Moving like greased lightning — at least by congressional standards — House Republicans yesterday released the tax plan that President Donald Trump wanted to call the “Cut Cut Cut Act.” Perhaps that’s just good branding, but after lawmakers backed off a proposal to restrict contributions to 401(k) plans at Trump’s behest28 and kept many of the cherished ideas that he campaigned on last year, it might make sense to use his pet name29. Granted, certain sectors of taxpayers may pay a little bit more, but that name’s offense to the language would pale in comparison to that of the Affordable Care Act30.
While what the House is calling (more sedately) the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did away with the proposed additional tolls on retirement accounts, there are still a number of features sure to raise the ire of specific groups. For one, the reviled top tax rate of 39.6% is unchanged, although the threshold to reach it is increased significantly for married couples — $1 million in annual income. By that same token, there are certain income levels and situations where the tax rate will increase31, hitting the extremely poor and upper-middle class in strange ways.
The proposed rates are 12%, 25%, 35% and 39.6% — four rates instead of the current seven.
|