nChrist
|
 |
« on: July 13, 2017, 02:46:20 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 7-13-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Jul. 13, 2017
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Trump’s FBI nominee pledges loyalty to the Constitution and Rule of Law, not one man. Look who’s funding opposition to rooting out voter fraud — George Soros. Will the GOP choose statesmanship and actually repeal ObamaCare? Daily Features: Top Headlines, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“We lay it down as a fundamental, that laws, to be just, must give a reciprocation of right; that, without this, they are mere arbitrary rules of conduct, founded in force, and not in conscience.” —Thomas Jefferson (1782)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Trump’s FBI Nominee: Russia Investigation Isn’t a ‘Witch Hunt’1
Christopher Wray, Donald Trump’s nominee to replace James Comey as head of the FBI, testified Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee at his confirmation hearing. Wray conducted himself well, as one would expect for an individual with his degree of career experience in both government and private sector employment. The most significant issue he was pressed to address was his ability to maintain political impartiality in an obviously politically partisan environment with the intelligence community plagued by leaks.
At one point, Wray was asked if a loyalty oath had been proposed to him, clearly a reference to Comey’s testimony2 that Trump requested he do so. Wray responded, “No one has asked me for any loyalty oath and I wouldn’t offer one. … My loyalty is to the Constitution, the Rule of Law and the mission of the FBI.” Good answer.
Wray was also asked what he thought about the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, including possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow. He said, “I do not consider Director [Robert] Mueller to be on a witch hunt.” He continued, “I would consider an effort to tamper with Director Mueller’s investigation to be unacceptable.” While we do believe the special investigation is indeed a Demo/MSM witch hunt3, Wray doesn’t have the luxury of expressing his personal opinions. The FBI director’s job requires maintaining an independent position as strictly as possible, and that begins during confirmation hearings.
Comey utterly failed in maintaining that strict impartiality. And while he may not have been a partisan politician, he was overly concerned with the political impact of the FBI’s investigations into both Hillary Clinton and the Trump/Russian collusion conspiracy, which subsequently affected his impartiality.
All indications suggest that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were pleased with Wray’s testimony and therefore there is little reason to believe that he will not be confirmed.
Soros Joins the Anti-Election Integrity Crusade4
For the time being, Donald Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity will cease gathering voter information5 pending a judicial ruling. The Electronic Privacy Information Center recently petitioned for a temporary restraining order (TRO), and a decision should be issued in short order. In the meantime, “the Commission … sent the states a … communication requesting the states not submit any data until this Court rules on plaintiff’s TRO motion,” according to a legal briefing6. This is the latest development in The Resistance’s attempt to foil Trump’s voter fraud probe7.
So what exactly is the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)? It’s anything but neutral. In fact, its tentacles are attached to a devious fascist named George Soros8, whose billions of dollars go toward bankrolling various leftist grievance industries (like Black Lives Matter). Over at PoliZette, Margaret Menge reveals9 that EPIC, “like many others fighting to stop the release and review of voter roll data, is funded by George Soros through his Open Society Foundations.” She goes on to note, “The Open Society Foundations have a $940 million budget and a staff of 1,600 with 47 offices in 42 countries.” Suffice to say, every staff member is tasked with promoting the socialist and anti-American agenda of Soros.
After all, if voter fraud is non-existent, why else would leftists keep obfuscating? The Heritage Foundation’s John G. Malcolm and Jason Snead make this point in The Daily Signal, where they write10, “If voter fraud were as rare as the left contends, and if adequate procedures are in place to prevent it from occurring, you would think those who make this argument would be anxious to provide the data that would serve to verify their assertions. Could it be that they fear the data would refute their claims?”
The fact is, they continue, “The Heritage Foundation’s Voter Fraud Database has thus far tallied 848 documented criminal convictions in voter fraud cases spanning 47 states, with new cases being uncovered every week.” Yet Gov. Andrew Cuomo says, “New York refuses to perpetuate the myth voter fraud played a role in our election.” It’s anything but a myth. That’s why Soros, like Cuomo and other cohorts, wants to keep the ugly reality of voter fraud under wraps. Let’s hope the judge accepts this reality.
Top Headlines11
Rep. Gowdy to Trump officials: “Disclose every contact you have ever had with Russia.” (CBS News12)
Obama DOJ let Russian lawyer into U.S. before she met with Trump team. (The Hill13)
CIA director says Russia tried to “muck” with U.S. election — in 2012. (CNS News14)
How pathetic: House Dem introduces articles of impeachment against Trump. (Hot Air15)
Selective Second Amendment: Few concealed handgun permits given to Hispanics, blacks or women in Los Angeles County. (Crime Prevention Research Center16)
“Study” finds fewer children would help climate change — liberals applaud. (Washington Examiner17)
Antarctica “naturally” calves massive iceberg; alarmists blame climate change. (Newsbusters18.)
Feds use arts funding to subsidize billion-dollar nonprofits. (The Washington Free Beacon19)
Report: Medicaid reduces health care access and recipients may receive worse quality care. (The Washington Free Beacon20)
Humor: Trump vs. CNN using Braveheart footage. (YouTube21)
Policy: Confronting the temperature taboo. (The Washington Times22)
Policy: Putting nuclear regulatory costs in context. (American Action Forum23)
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report24. Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column
Read Al Gore, Al Jazeera and Al Qa'ida25. Al Gore sues Al Jazeera seeking windfall profits from the Islamist media propagandist.
If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email, update your subscription here26.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Better Health Care or Broken Promises?27
By Arnold Ahlert
“As Obamacare brought grief, Republicans fed on public hate for it for four election cycles. Today, they seem stuck with their original commitment to the health of the health insurance industry — as if maintaining the companies as public utilities and passing taxpayer money through them to lower patient out-of-pocket costs were a step toward freedom rather than another step toward socialism.” —Angelo Codevilla28, July 10, 2017
Sadly, the American electorate remains burdened by an out-of-touch political class whose most pressing priority is to convince us there are large differences between Democrats and Republicans, and that a vote for one side or the other will produce substantive change.
Democrats gave us ObamaCare. It was sold on a litany of lies29 by Barack Obama and his cadres, who assured us we could keep our doctors and our existing health care plans, and save $2,500 per year on premiums. Those lies were buttressed by contempt, eloquently espoused30 by ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber, who boasted about the “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” that enabled the bill’s passage.
Nancy Pelosi got the lion’s share of the blame for that contempt when, on March 9, 2010, she spoke31 about having to “pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”
In reality, Pelosi’s contempt was dwarfed by that of Democrat Rep. John Conyers. “I love these members that get up and say, ‘Read the bill,’” he mocked32 at a National Press Club luncheon on July 29, 2009, regarding the initial efforts to get ObamaCare through the House. “What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”
What good are elected representatives who disdain the fundamental responsibilities of representative government?
Americans were furious. In 2010, they handed the House to the GOP. In 2014, they added the Senate. If the first victory was a response to Democrats’ ham-fisted passage of the law, the second was largely fueled by its consequences — soaring insurance premiums, narrowing provider networks, and the ongoing implosion of ObamaCare exchanges. All of that was precipitated by a “health insurance industry” whose initial dreams of untold profits they thought the mandatory insurance requirement would engender instead crashed and burned when millions of sick Americans signed up for policies — and millions of healthy Americans needed to subsidize them, didn’t.
|