nChrist
|
 |
« on: March 04, 2017, 04:19:00 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 3-2-2017 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Mar. 2, 2017
IN TODAY’S EDITION
The Left has a very specific agenda with its new round of “Russia!” attacks on Sessions. The sun could be driving temperatures higher. Who knew? Memo to Princeton bioethicist: Even babies with Down Syndrome have value. Daily Features: Top Headlines, Cartoons, Columnists and Short Cuts.
THE FOUNDATION
“If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it, whenever our legislators shall please so to alter the law and shall chearfully consent to exchange my liberty of abusing others for the privilege of not being abused myself.” —Benjamin Franklin (1789)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
The MSM Russian Obsession1
Mainstream media outlets across the nation this morning essentially ran the same headline — Attorney General Sessions Lied About Not Meeting With Russians. Democrats couldn’t cue up fast enough to offer their best renditions of Joseph McCarthy in calling for Sessions' immediate resignation. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who had been an especially vocal critic of Sessions during his confirmation hearings, bloviated, “We need a special prosecutor totally independent of the AG. We need Attorney General Jeff Sessions — who should have never been confirmed in the first place — to resign. We need it now.”
So what’s the story here? Did Sessions lie? The short answer is no, because context is crucial. It was revealed Wednesday that Sessions had met twice with the Russian ambassador before the election. One meeting was in an official capacity in his role as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the second was a public meeting at the Heritage Foundation directly after a speech Sessions gave. Neither meeting had anything to do with Donald Trump’s campaign. At his confirmation hearings, Sessions was asked if he had communications with the Russians regarding the Trump campaign. Sessions responded, “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in [Trump’s] campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.” In a questionnaire, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked whether Sessions “had been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day.” Sessions' replied, “No.”
In reality, there are two components to this story, the Leftmedia’s fiscal bottom line and the Democrats' resistance agenda. The mainstream media is trolling a molehill of a story, seeking to play it up to scandal proportions as a means to gain attention and sell advertising. There is almost nothing to this story, but because of the juicy Russian component the MSM can feature it for great click bait. For the Democrats, the story serves as yet another vehicle to further their “Trump is an illegitimate president” mantra and the narrative of the Russian election-meddling conspiracy. We’re sure it’s pure coincidence that this story broke just after Trump’s hugely successful speech2.
So, stay tuned, as one can expect more of these types of non-scandal scandalous stories from the Leftmedia far into the foreseeable future.
Shining the Light on Climate Science3
On Monday, Bill Nye, sitting alongside fellow climate alarmist Bernie Sanders, chided “extreme skeptics”4, lecturing them “to think about what is called cognitive dissonance.” He asserted, “Instead of accepting that the climate is changing, deniers are denying the evidence and dismissing the authorities.”
The problem, as elucidated in an Investor’s Business Daily editorial5, is “we’re often told by advocates of climate change that the ‘science is settled.’ But in fact, ‘science’ itself is in a deep crisis over making claims it can’t back up, especially about climate.” For example, the article continues, an analysis by University of Virginia’s Center for Open Science “estimates that roughly 70% of all studies can’t be reproduced. And this includes the field of climate change.” The fact that “99% of scientists” — a bogus but nevertheless often repeated statistic — blame man-made emissions for global warming despite often being unable to replicate studies is highly alarming.
Meanwhile, a new study of planetary orbits flies in the face of the conventional climate change theory. As reported in a news release6, the University of Wisconsin-Madison reports newfound “evidence confirming a critical theory of how the planets in our solar system behave in their orbits around the sun.” The report explains how “small but regular ticks in a planet’s orbit can exert big changes on the location and orientation of a planet on its axis relative to the sun and, accordingly, change the amount of solar radiation a planet receives over a given area. Where and how much solar radiation a planet gets is a key driver of climate.”
Now consider this: The globe soaks up roughly 3,850,000 exajoules (EJ) of solar energy annually. To better comprehend this number, De Anza College’s Ridha Hamidi, Ph.D., says7, “More energy from sunlight strikes the earth in one hour than all of the energy currently consumed on the planet in one year. The amount of solar energy reaching the surface of the planet is so vast that in one year it is about twice as much as will ever be obtained from all of the Earth’s non-renewable resources of coal, oil, natural gas, and mined uranium combined.” Read the last sentence twice if you have to.
In an email to The Patriot Post, meteorologist Joe Bastardi responds: “I have not read enough of the study to comment on aspects I have not researched. But given my stated position that the sun is the conductor of the climatic orchestra of the oceans, stochastic events and the very design of the system, it would make sense that the sun should be considered as the source of climatic variations rather than the increase of one molecule of CO2 out of every 10 thousand molecules of air over a 100-year period.” The lesson here is that man’s footprint isn’t just relatively small, it’s minuscule. Perhaps it’s not the skeptics who are, as Nye says, “denying the evidence,” but rather those who want to silence the discussion.
Top Headlines8
Senate confirms Carson to lead HUD. (The Hill9)
White House eyes plan to cut EPA staff by one-fifth, eliminating key programs. (The Washington Post10)
Cornyn introduces national concealed carry reciprocity bill to Senate. (Washington Free Beacon11)
House Democrats fire Muslim IT staffers under investigation12 by Capitol Hill police. (Hot Air13)
Nearly 40 leaks of classified information reported in 2016. (Washington Free Beacon14)
Thousands of non-citizens lurking on Virginia’s voter rolls. (The Washington Times15)
The Congressional Black Caucus PAC (CBC PAC) spends lavishly on upscale resorts and hotels, catering at exclusive restaurants, and on fundraising. (Washington Free Beacon16)
Harvard Law administrators accused of stealing money meant for students with disabilities. (CBS Boston17)
Trump administration has found only $20 million in existing funds for the border wall. (Reuters18.)
NY Teamsters' pension fund goes belly up. (Washington Free Beacon19)
Al-Qaida deputy Abu al-Khayr al-Masri killed in CIA drone strike. (CBS News20)
All in the family — Biden widow breaks up brother’s marriage. (Fox News21)
Amazon cloud sputters for hours, and a boatload of websites go offline. (ArsTechnica22)
Policy: Trump’s 5 health care principles, explained. (The Daily Signal23)
Policy: To unleash prosperity, Dodd-Frank must go. (The Heritage Foundation24)
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report25. Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column
Read Trump’s Triumph Is Demos' Disaster26. The shell-shocked expressions on Democrat faces were priceless.
If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email, update your subscription here27.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS No, Peter Singer — All People Have Inherent Worth28
By Allyne Caan
Even as Hollywood turned Sunday’s Oscars into a political pulpit to denounce supposed “inhumane” immigration policies, a real inhumanity went unchallenged.
It’s the inhumanity that sees some humans as worse than pigs and advocates brutally killing them by the most torturous methods, including chemically burning them alive, tearing them limb from limb, and even decapitating them.
If you think this refers to the barbarism of the Islamic State, think again — although the resemblance is strong. But no, this barbarism comes from Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer.
|