nChrist
|
 |
« on: December 16, 2016, 02:25:28 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 12-15-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Dec. 15, 2016
IN TODAY’S EDITION
What’s behind the canceled House intel briefing on the Russian hack? Obama’s stocking stuffer for Planned Parenthood — protected funding. Government wants to start “educating” your kids even earlier. And more news, policy and opinion.
THE FOUNDATION
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” —Bill of Rights (1791)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Doublespeak on the Russian Hack1
An NBC News headline2 reads, “U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack.” According to the story, unnamed U.S. intelligence officials believe with “a high level of confidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin is personally responsible for instigating the now-infamous hack attack3 on the DNC. The article continues to cite these “unnamed officials” as if what they’re leaking is gospel truth. Clearly, NBC News has little fear of potentially reporting “fake news.”
On the other hand, a WikiLeaks source claims the Russians had nothing to do with hacking the DNC emails. Instead, the source was a disgruntled Democrat staffer who was disgusted with Clinton and shared the damaging information in a secret deep-throat-style meeting. This also is a rather dubious story that may be aimed at attempting to boosting WikiLeaks' relevance.
In fact, the larger story, which much of the mainstream media has conveniently ignored, is the fact that the directors of National Intelligence canceled a closed-door briefing with the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday. This prompted Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) to express his frustration: “It is unacceptable that the Intelligence Community directors would not fulfill the House Intelligence Committee’s request to be briefed tomorrow on the cyber-attacks that occurred during the presidential campaign. The legislative branch is constitutionally vested with oversight responsibility of executive branch agencies, which are obligated to comply with our requests.”
Nunes continued, stating that his committee “is vigorously looking into reports of cyber-attacks during the election campaign, and in particular we want to clarify press reports that the CIA has a new assessment that it has not shared with us. The committee is deeply concerned that intransigence in sharing intelligence with Congress can enable the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes.”
It is indeed puzzling that the nation’s intelligence directors would remain silent while unnamed officials from their agencies relate unsubstantiated reports to the media. Why dodge informing Congress? Why allow for the continued appearance of the intelligence community anonymously meddling in politics through the mass media?
What is known is that there has been no official report stating that the Russians hacked the DNC in order to help elect Donald Trump. There is no evidence of Russian interference in actual voting. And regarding those leaked DNC emails, nothing from them was fabricated — those were genuine and did indeed shed light on Democrat campaign manipulation. It wasn’t the Russians who made Hillary Clinton unlikable; Hillary has only herself to blame for that.
An Obama Claus Stocking Stuffer for Planned Parenthood4
Barack Obama “has cemented his legacy as a champion for women’s health,” crowed Planned Parenthood CEO Cecilia Richards. What makes the chief of the nation’s largest abortion mill so happy? A last-minute Obama regulation aimed at saving Planned Parenthood’s huge federal revenue stream — half a billion dollars from federal taxpayers every year. “The final version of the [HHS] rule,” reports5 The Washington Times, “requires states to distribute dollars from Title X of the Public Health Service Act without taking into account whether recipient clinics perform abortions.” Fourteen states have directed funding away from Planned Parenthood in recent years. Obama’s rule is basically the reverse of the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funds for abortions. But don’t think for a minute that $500 million in federal funds isn’t helping pay for some abortions.
Richards added, “Now, we continue to fight for our patients' access to care.” Dr. Karen A. Scott, chief medical officer at the Department of Health and Human Services, got the talking points memo, saying, “This rule will strengthen access to essential services like cancer screenings and contraception for some of the most vulnerable patients in this country.” We’ll note again that Planned Parenthood doesn’t own a single mammogram machine, which is what most people think when hearing “women’s health” and “cancer screenings.” Planned Parenthood is deliberately deceptive in this regard. And that’s not even to mention the organization’s efforts to sell harvested organs from aborted babies, for which both House and Senate committees have issued a criminal referral6.
Of course, with Donald Trump and his incoming HHS Secretary Tom Price about to take the helm, Obama’s new rule may not be long for this world. But it’s the opening salvo in the next battle for funding the abortion giant. Republicans will soon control both ends of Pennsylvania Ave. It’s time to make that count.
Top Headlines7
SHOCKER! White House, Clinton tied to PR firm behind Electoral College push. (Daily Caller8.)
$213,300,000,000: Individual income taxes set record in first 2 months of FY17. (CNS News9)
Tax code compliance costs economy $1 trillion annually. (Washington Free Beacon10)
More than one billion Yahoo user accounts stolen by hackers. Must be the Russians… (Business Insider11)
Labor Secretary Tom Perez for DNC? Some Democrats don’t want a radical Muslim like Keith Ellison. (The Washington Post12)
Fed raises rates, boosts outlook for borrowing costs in 2017. (Bloomberg13)
Iran sanctions renewal becomes law even without Obama’s signature. (Associated Press14)
Obama’s parting shot across USN bow: Tags three more ships with his left-wing baggage. (Defense Department15)
Muslim student who claimed harassment by Trump supporters charged with filing false report. (NBC New York16)
Students rip down portrait of Shakespeare, in favor of a “black, lesbian, mother, warrior, poet.” Take that, whitey! (Lifezette17)
Policy: Make Yucca Mountain great again. (Washington Examiner18.)
Policy: Our frackers beat their hackers. (Real Clear World19)
The Bill of Rights20
Today, Dec. 15, is the anniversary of the 1791 ratification of our Bill of Rights21, the first 10 Amendments to our Constitution, and the Rule of Law22 it enshrines.
The Bill of Rights was inspired by three remarkable documents: John Locke’s 1689 thesis, “Two Treatises of Government,” regarding the protection of “property” (in the Latin context, proprius, or one’s own “life, liberty and estate”); in part from the Virginia Declaration of Rights23 authored by George Mason in 1776 as part of that state’s Constitution; and, of course, in part from our Declaration of Independence24 authored by Thomas Jefferson.
Read in context, the Bill of Rights is both an affirmation of innate “unalienable rights25” of man, and a clear proscription upon any central government infringement of those rights. As oft trampled and abused as the Bill of Rights is by those who’ve sworn an oath “to Support and Defend26” our Constitution, most notably “judicial supremacists27,” or the “despotic branch” as Jefferson called the judiciary, Patriots must remain ever vigilant in order to sustain our rights.
Don’t Miss Alexander’s Column
Read The Trump Administration — A Reagan Revival!28. Trump’s nominees rival the conservative pedigrees of those chosen by Ronald Reagan some 35 years ago.
If you’d like to receive Alexander’s Column by email, update your subscription here29.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Gov’t to Parents: We Need Your Kids Earlier30
By Allyne Caan
When Philadelphia’s Democrat Mayor Jim Kenney took office earlier this year, he made universal pre-K one of his policy priorities. Now, children as young as three can begin their government indoctrination in the City of Brotherly Love.
But, oh Mr. Mayor. How far behind the times you are. Three years old? To truly get ahold of our kids and mold them into tiny state subjects, government must start much earlier.
Not surprisingly, that’s exactly what some are suggesting.
|