nChrist
|
 |
« on: October 13, 2016, 06:57:58 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post Digest 10-12-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Mid-Day Digest
Oct. 12, 2016
IN TODAY’S EDITION
Would jailing Clinton usher in a banana republic? Clinton dispatches Gore to win over Millennials with warming talk. Voter fraud does happen … says a Democrat election commissioner. Hillary’s campaign ignored warnings about the $15 minimum wage. And more news, policy and opinion.
THE FOUNDATION
“How much more do they deserve our reverence and praise, whose lives are devoted to the formation of institutions, which, when they and their children are mingled in the common dust, may continue to cherish the principles and the practice of liberty in perpetual freshness and vigour.” —Joseph Story (1833)
TOP RIGHT HOOKS
Clinton-Gore Team Up to Save the Planet1
Hillary Clinton isn’t assuming an election victory just yet, as she’s still angling for the Bernie Sanders/Millennial crowd by dispatching … Al “Jazeera” Gore to Miami to talk voting and global warming. (And if anyone knows about hot air, it’s Al.) What better reason to scare Florida voters about climate change than last weekend’s monster hurricane? “Elections have consequences,” Gore told the crowd. “Your vote really, really, really counts. A lot. You could consider me Exhibit A of that truth.” That would be a reference to his defeat in 2000. “For those of you who are younger than 25, you might not remember the election of 2000 or what happened here in Florida and across the country,” Gore said. “For those of you older than 25, I heard you murmuring just now but take it from me it was a very close election.”
And why is voting for Clinton important? Gore says it’s because Donald Trump “take us toward a climate catastrophe,” while Clinton will make fighting climate change a “top national priority.” After all, fearmongering about the climate is a great way for Democrats to advocate government power. It’s the primary reason the “care” about the planet at all.
Democrat Admits Voter Fraud Is a Real Problem2
Project Veritas just released another undercover video3 — this one featuring an inconvenient admission from Alan Schulkin, a Democrat elections commissioner for New York City: “There is a lot of fraud — not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.” In the video from a conversation at a party last December Schulkin confirms the problem of voter fraud that many conservatives have warned about for some time. When questioned about asking for ID cards to vote, Schulkin’s replied, “The law says you can’t ask for anything, which they really should be able to do. You know I don’t think it’s too much to ask someone to show some kind of an ID.”
He also referenced the problem with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s ID card program. Schulkin said, “He gave out ID cards, de Blasio. They don’t… that’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But they didn’t vet the people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say, I’m Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd.” He even opined, “This is why I’m getting more conservative as I get older.”
Indeed, this is further evidence of the need for voter ID laws. Those on the Left who rail against them are at best unconcerned with the integrity of the U.S.’s electoral system or at worst actively defrauding, and therefore disenfranchising, honest Americans.
Votes for $154
Paying workers at least $15 an hour may damage the economy, but who cares so long as it gets the votes? WikiLeaks recent release of Hillary Clinton’s emails reveals a remarkably callous attitude from her campaign in regard to the negative impact a $15 federal minimum wage would have on the economy. First, a little back story. Hillary, who in her primary campaign had initially supported a $12 minimum wage, made a play for Bernie Sanders supporters by jumping on the $15 minimum wage bandwagon. Barack Obama’s own economic adviser Alan Krueger, who has called for incremental increases to the minimum wage, warned in a New York Times op-ed that a $15 minimum wage would result in “severe” economic consequences, with much of the country not able to absorb such a significant wage hike.
In an email to four top Clinton campaign staffers, Neera Tanden, head of the Center for American Progress, warned against the $15 minimum wage policy, writing, “Substantively, we have not supported $15 — you will get a fair number of liberal economists who will say it will lose jobs.” Not only was there no push back against that suggestion, but neither did Clinton’s campaign change policy course. Evidently, Hillary is fine with Americans losing their jobs so long as it favors her politically. Here is yet another example of the problem with socialism. Those in power may say they care more for the plight of the poor than do capitalists, and yet their actions betray that they are primarily concerned with consolidating power — often at the expense of jobs and freedom.
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
Ben Shapiro: The Astounding Hypocrisy of Hollywood, the Media and the Democrats5 Jonah Goldberg: When Republicans Wish Upon a ‘Star’6 Star Parker: Whole Foods and Chicago Partner to Fight Poverty7
For more, visit Right Opinion8.
TOP HEADLINES
Court Curtails Consumer Board’s Power9 WikiLeaks Drops 1,100 Podesta Emails10 Clinton Campaign Boasts About Media: ‘Every Single Interviewer Was for Her’11
For more, visit Patriot Headline Report12.
FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS Would Jailing Clinton Usher in a Banana Republic?13
By Lewis Morris
Donald Trump’s promise to assign a special prosecutor14 to investigate Hillary Clinton’s email shenanigans might be the single biggest moment that people took away from Sunday’s debate15.
“If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation,” he said. That led to an exchange that featured his best line of the night. Clinton responded, “It’s awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country.”
Trump shot back, “Because you’d be in jail.”
His words have been perverted by Democrats to mean that he is advocating a “banana republic” form of government. The assumption established by Clinton’s Leftmedia super PAC is that Trump would use his presidential power to punish a political opponent, in this case Hillary Clinton.
Trump supporters are emboldened by his remarks, as the noisy crowd that Anderson Cooper admonished16 at the debate demonstrates. Promising to deliver justice to Clinton is red meat, but it’s also what she deserves. Yet there are a lot of undecided voters and Republicans with short memories who are in danger of being swayed by the Trump-as-Dictator rhetoric.
|