nChrist
|
 |
« on: August 04, 2016, 06:28:00 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post - Alexander's Column 8-3-2016 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
Clinton's Khan: Who Is Trashing Whom?
By Mark Alexander
Aug. 3, 2016
“In politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.” —Alexander Hamilton (1787)
Since Donald J. Trump announced his presidential candidacy, no week has passed when he has not said something thoughtless, if not “yugely” absurd, which derails political momentum targeting the Obama-Clinton economy and foreign policy. His endless loop of unforced gaffes send all of his handlers and backers into damage control mode — and his endorsers into some state of buyer’s remorse.
This week was no exception.
Trump was asked by former Clintonista George Stephanopoulos to respond to criticism from Khizr Khan, who, with his wife Ghazala, were given center-stage billing by Hillary Clinton1 at last week’s DNC confab2.
Unfortunately and predictably, Trump took the bait, and the issue was both what he said and what he did not say — notably he failed to properly acknowledge and honor their son, Army Captain Humayun Khan, who was killed in Iraq in 2004.
Capt. Khan served our nation and the soldiers under his command with honor, and died with heroic dignity. His service and sacrifice trumps any religious, ethnic, cultural and political distinctions.
But that is not why Clinton gave his parents center billing on a stage where one lone American flag had been posted as an afterthought.
In 2003, President George W. Bush launched Operation Iraqi Freedom3, endeavoring to keep the war against Islamist terror on their turf and off of ours. Between 2003 and Barack Obama’s politically motivated retreat from Iraq4 in 2011, there were 4,497 American military deaths in Iraq — 3,836 of which were combat related.
So why was this particular Gold Star family chosen to speak rather than any of the 4,496 other Gold Star families? Because they are Muslim parents, whose son died in combat.
Clinton could have invited the Gold Star parents of military personnel killed on Obama’s watch by Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the Islamist Jihadi5 who murdered 13 American soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, and wounded 33 others. Or she could have invited Gold Star parents of soldiers killed while searching for Muslim convert deserter Bowe Bergdahl6 — heralded as a hero by Obama and Clinton.
Of course, those parents, nor the vast majority of other Gold Star parents, would fit Clinton’s political narrative.
Who is Khizr Khan and what did he say?
The Khans are Pakistanis, who immigrated from UAE in 1980. He is a Harvard Law grad and went on to work for major power firms in Washington, with lots of Clinton connections. His firm handled Hillary Clinton’s taxes. Notably they represent the government of Saudi Arabia — which donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation while Clinton was secretary of state, in addition to underwriting the malignant spread of Wahhabi Islamism. Khan was also a key legal adviser for EB5 immigration visas, which provide wealthy foreigners a method for buying their way into the U.S. — though Khan removed that legal specialty7 from his website. Of course, members of Khan’s firm have been major donation bundlers for Clinton’s campaign.
You can listen to Mr. Khan’s brief and contentious remarks here8, but allow me to address a few of his assertions and accusations, with the understanding that, all due respect, Mr. Khan’s remarks are not unimpeachable by virtue of the fact that his son was killed in Iraq.
Khan: “Donald Trump, you’re asking Americans to trust you with their future. Let me ask you: have you even read the United States Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy [pulling one out of his pocket].”
However, Obama and Clinton have done more to undermine constitutional Rule of Law9 than any administration in American history. And they have, likewise, completely disregarded their oaths “to Support and Defend10” our Constitution — the same oath Capt. Khan defended with his life.
(For the record, the word “liberty” appears in the preamble, and the words “equal protection of law” appear only once in the 14th Amendment, which has been grossly misinterpreted by judicial activist 11“ in the 20th century – and Ivy League lawyers like Obama, Clinton and Khan.)
Khan: "Hillary Clinton was right when she called my son ‘the best of America.’ If it was up to Donald Trump, he never would have been in America.”
That latter assertion is not true, but it is worth noting that in 1980 when Mr. Khan immigrated, Jimmy Carter had banned Iranian immigrants who could not demonstrate their opposition to Shiite Islamism. That ban was motivated by concerns similar to those of Trump, who has stated that if we can’t establish whether Syrian immigrants are friends of foes, we should not let them in. Though our Constitution gives Congress virtually unlimited authority to enact legislative restrictions on immigration, Obama has unilaterally undermined those laws with extra-constitutional executive diktats12, subsequently overturned by the federal courts.
Khan: “[Trump], have you ever been to Arlington Cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave Patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”
I wonder if Mr. Khan has come to terms with the fact that another Muslim murdered his beloved son Humayun — and the other 3,836 Americans with whom Capt. Khan served in Iraq.
Khan: “What sacrifice have you made for your country?”
That question would be better asked of Hillary Clinton. As OIF Army veteran David French observed, “Hillary Clinton hasn’t sacrificed — she’s lived the progressive dream. And she’s certainly not a ‘public servant’ — she’s a cynical, grasping, and ambitious politician. Her accomplishments are meager, and her one guiding star is her own self-advancement.”
Khan: “I request to honor the sacrifice of my son — take the time to get out and vote for … Hillary Clinton.”
Sadly, I believe that vote would dishonor the service and sacrifice of Capt. Khan.
What did Trump actually say about the Khans?
For 10 years prior to his candidacy announcement, Trump hosted his successful reality show “The Apprentice.” For all those years, he controlled the script — what did and did not make it to air. It seems that Trump has yet to figure out that he has NO control over the script of his “Make America Great Again” reality show, other than controlling what he says. His unfiltered off-script ramblings are often tactless when not outright asinine, unlike the politically astute Hillary Clinton, whose remarks are always cunning and calculated.
Whether on stump speeches, or when he takes media bait, there is no filter between Trump’s stream of consciousness and any live microphone (or social media feed) in his proximity. And he has yet to grasp the concept, “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”
Consequently, the endless cycle of his inane insults is the greatest obstacle to recruiting enough voters from #NeverTrump to #NeverClinton13 in order for him to win. Trump is, truly, his own worst enemy, and if he wins in November, it will be on Clinton’s plethora of weaknesses, not his strengths.
In the interview with Stephanopoulos, Trump was asked, “Khizr Khan, speaking at the Democratic convention, his son Captain Humayun Khan was killed serving in Iraq, and he had some very tough questions for you. He said you wouldn’t have even let his son in America.”
|