The Patriot Post Digest 7-6-2016

________________________________________
The Patriot Post Digest 7-6-2016
From The Federalist Patriot
Free Email Subscription
________________________________________

Mid-Day Digest

Jul. 6, 2016

THE FOUNDATION

“Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure.” —Thomas Jefferson (1823)

FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSIS
Lawless Hillary Off the Hook1

By Nate Jackson

In one of the more predictable if inexplicable decisions in the history of the FBI, Director James Comey announced2 Tuesday that there would be no charges against Hillary Clinton for violating federal law with her unsecured private email server. No wonder Barack Obama gave Clinton a ride on Air Force One later the same day to campaign together.

Given Bill Clinton’s clandestine meeting3 with Attorney General Loretta Lynch last week, Comey began by countering the obvious objection: “I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.” Forgive us if we find that hard to believe. Think Air Force One would be in play if she were about to be indicted?

Among the FBI’s findings: 

In clear violation of federal law, Hillary Clinton sent and received marked and unmarked classified information, including “seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level” — the highest classification.

She lied on multiple occasions denying this fact.

Comey said Clinton “should have known” her unsecured private email system (there were actually multiple servers) was not the place for this information. He also noted, “Only a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

Clinton did not turn over all work-related emails to the State Department. Some of those deleted-but-recovered emails contained classified information, and some of her deleted emails were so thoroughly scrubbed as to never be recovered and the FBI was thus unable to assess them.

She lied on multiple occasions insisting she had turned over everything not “personal” in nature, but Comey said investigators found “no intentional misconduct” in the sorting process.

While the FBI could not prove her system was hacked, Comey said, “We assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.” Indeed, it is all but certain.

Comey concluded by saying, “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” Therefore, “although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”

Yet in perhaps the most damning statement he made, he conceded there’s a different standard at play: “This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.” Laws are for the little people.

He claimed there was insufficient evidence of malicious “intent,” but, as he had already explained, intent isn’t the primary consideration — she broke the law. In any case, Clinton’s intent was clear4: She wanted to avoid political accountability. And in deliberately setting up a private server as her sole method of email, she clearly intended to communicate with it — even sending and receiving classified information.

Furthermore, as former DOJ prosecutor Andrew McCarthy argues5, “Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18.): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was ‘extremely careless’ and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services. Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States. In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require.”

There are essentially three possibilities: 1. Comey simply lacked the stomach to recommend the indictment of a presumptive presidential nominee in an election year. 2. Contrary to his assertions, his recommendation was indeed coordinated or reviewed by political hacks at the “Justice” Department. 3. Comey concluded Hanlon’s razor was at play: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” And thus a prosecution would be hard to win, which might look worse than not bringing charges at all. In any case, as far as we can tell, Clinton is getting away with breaking the law, and it appears to be par for the course in Obama’s America.

P.S. Here’s a rundown of some of Clinton’s lies compared to Comey’s findings6.

BEST OF RIGHT OPINION

Michelle Malkin: Iovi Et Bovi: The Teflon Hillary Standard7
Walter Williams: Thinking Beyond Stage One8
Todd Starnes: ‘Some’ Iowa Churches Must Comply With Transgender Bathroom Laws9
Stephen Moore: Energy Independence at Last10

For more, visit Right Opinion11.

TOP HEADLINES

Court Strikes Down ObamaCare Rule on Insurance Standards12
Protests Following Cop Shooting of Black Man in Baton Rouge13
Audit: VA Still Has ‘Profound Deficiencies’14

For more, visit Patriot Headline Report15.

TOP RIGHT HOOKS

Obama’s Third Term?16

Barack Obama took Hillary Clinton on a ride aboard Air Force One Tuesday, traveling to a campaign event in North Carolina. Clinton’s campaign promises to reimburse taxpayers for its portion of the $220,000 per hour operating expense, but the picture of Hillary disembarking the presidential airplane is worth the price. The trip occurred just hours after FBI Director James Comey gave every reason1 to indict Clinton before declining to do so. But the campaign jaunt was scheduled at least by early last week. What else happened early last week? Bill Clinton’s “chance” meeting3 with Attorney General Loretta Lynch — which might tell you all you need to know.

Clinton and Obama were bitter rivals in 2008. After he vanquished her in the primaries, however, he soon appointed her as secretary of state because having the Clintons as political enemies wasn’t going to work. The rest is history. Now he’s campaigning for her like no departing president has for his successor in a century. That speaks volumes about how highly Obama esteems his own legacy.