nChrist
|
 |
« on: July 22, 2015, 06:37:14 PM » |
|
________________________________________ The Patriot Post - Alexander's Column 7-22-2015 From The Federalist Patriot Free Email Subscription ________________________________________
If Black Lives REALLY Mattered... From Dream to Nightmare
By Mark Alexander
Jul. 22, 2015
“The mobs of the great cities add just so much to the support of pure government as sores do to the strength of the human body. It is the manners and spirit of a people, which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution.” —Thomas Jefferson (1787)
In June, Hillary Clinton suggested the unthinkable. While visiting a black community church in Florissant, MO, she asserted that, in fact, “All lives matter.”
The backlash (or blacklash) was immediate, because leftist race-bait political hustlers1 claim exclusive rights over whose lives matter, and any Democrat who dares suggests anything other than “black lives matter” is subject to immediate reprimand.
After hearing Clinton’s remark, Rev. Renita Lamkin concluded, “That blew a lot of support that she may have been able to engender here.”
The sound bite “black lives matter” was born alongside the “hands up, don’t shoot” mantra after a black Ferguson thug was shot by a white police officer, and the St. Louis County Prosecutor (a Democrat) determined the shooting was justifiable self defense2.
No matter. Political agendas trump facts, and the dishonest and disgraceful “hands up” myth persists to this day.
Last weekend, Democrat presidential contender Martin O'Malley, the former governor of the People’s Republic of Maryland, made the same egregious mistake at this year’s Netroots Nation convention of “progressive” political activists.
O'Malley’s address to the gathering was interrupted by attendees shouting, “Black lives matter!” He responded: “Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter.”
Oops! The audience was rendered apoplectic — how could a “Nutroots” regular make such an appalling mistake?
Clinton was quick to chastise O'Malley, working in both Democrat “divide-and-conquer” themes of race and class: “Everyone in this country should stand firmly behind [black lives matter]. We need to acknowledge some hard truths about race and justice in this country, and one of those hard truths is that that racial inequality is not merely a symptom of economic inequality. Black people across America still experience racism every day.”
A day later, O'Malley apologized: “That was a mistake on my part, and I meant no disrespect. I did not mean to be insensitive in any way or to communicate that I did not understand the tremendous passion, commitment and feeling and depth of feeling that all of us should be attaching to this issue.”
O'Malley’s error occurred in the shadow of the death of a black drug dealer3 in Baltimore Police custody, and the more recent murder of Christians4 at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston. The Baltimore death was unintentional, but will produce a solid $5-$10 million liability lottery payout for the perp’s family, as was the case in the police-involved death of a New York thug5. While Baltimore has already named a youth center6 in honor of the “victim,” the cash will be coming.
However, the Charleston assault was clearly motivated by racist views — which had been cultivated by an abusive broken home life and amplified by habitual drug use. In fact, racially motivated white-on-black assaults are far more rare than racially motivated black-on-white assaults, but who’s counting?
In the month after the Baltimore drug dealer’s death, there were 43 homicides in Baltimore7, almost all of them black-on-black. The weekend after the assault in Charleston, there were 10 homicides8 in Obama’s hometown of Chicago, and again, almost all were black-on-black. This epidemic of black-on-black violence is typical in most urban centers across the nation.
And yet, not a word of protest from any Democrat or leftist black activist.
So, do black lives really matter?
After the Charleston attack, instead of focusing on the real issues fomenting racial disunity, Democrats did what they do best — used the blood of innocents9 to advance their political agenda. In this case, they equated the Confederate Battle Flag with the Nazi swastika, and they are now endeavoring to eradicate every vestige of that historic symbol from the planet.
The flag came down in Charleston10, despite the fact that one of the individuals murdered there, Pastor Clementa Pinckney, had previously voted to keep the flag flying11 at the South Carolina capitol grounds. It is noteworthy that among the other bold black supporters of the flag is H.K. Edgerton12, former president of the North Carolina NAACP.
The Obama administration ordered the Confederate Battle Flag removed from the nation’s first National Military Park13, Chickamauga, established in 1890 for reconciliation between veterans of the Confederate and Union forces after the War Between the States. (For the record, at our offices we fly the American flag14, but honor both our nation’s Union and Confederate Veterans.)
And now, black “leaders” across the South are attempting to whitewash from the earth, Soviet-style, our nation’s Confederate heritage — calling for removal of the sculptures of Lee, Jackson and Davis on Stone Mountain near Atlanta, and the removal of statues of Confederate Patriots in every major Southern city. Memphis officials want to exhume the remains of the brilliant Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest from a city cemetery. Others want to rename Ft. Hood, Ft. Bragg and other military installations that take their names from Confederate war heroes.
Of course, all these race hustlers might want to visit U.S. Code 85-425, Sec 410, which established that all Confederate veterans be recognized equally with Union veterans, which is to say that defacing or removing such monuments is a felony. In reality, if history so bothers these race-baiters, they should start by taking down the Democrat Party, which supported and defended slavery during the War Between the States. The Republican Party, of course, was opposed to slavery.
Walter E. Williams sums up this charade as a case study of historical ignorance15. And Thomas Sowell writes of the futility of refighting the Civil War16: “We need a lot more serious thinking about the present and the future, and a lot less time and energy spent on the past.”
Apparently black lives do matter to Williams and Sowell, two of our nation’s most esteemed thinkers on matters of economy and race.
Black lives also mattered to Martin Luther King. In 1963, King17 said famously: “I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
|