POLITICAL FUTURES“Barack Obama’s speech last week, hastily prepared to extinguish the firestorm over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, won critical praise for style and substance but failed politically. By elevating the question of race in America, the front-running Democratic presidential candidate has deepened the dilemma created by his campaign’s success against the party establishment’s anointed choice, Hillary Clinton. In rejecting the racist views of his longtime spiritual mentor but not disowning him, Obama has unwittingly enhanced his image as the African-American candidate — not just a remarkable candidate who happens to be black. That poses a racial dilemma for unelected super-delegates, who as professional politicians will pick the winner since neither Obama nor Clinton can win enough elected delegates to be nominated. Super-delegates, though they were inclined to Clinton no longer than three months ago, now flinch at rejecting Obama. They fear antagonizing African-Americans, who have become the hard-core Democratic base. But what if national polls continue their post-Wright trend and show Obama trailing both Clinton and Republican John McCain in popular support?” — Robert Novak
RE: THE LEFT“[Barack Obama’s] whiny wife, Michelle, says that her husband’s election as president would be the first reason to have ‘pride’ in America, and complains that this country is ‘downright mean’ and that she’s having difficulty finding money for their daughters’ piano lessons and summer camp. Between them, Mr. and Mrs. Obama earn $480,000 a year (not including book royalties from ‘The Audacity Of Hype,’ but they’re whining about how tough they have it to couples who earn 48 grand — or less. Yes, we can. But not on a lousy half-million bucks a year. God has blessed America, and blessed the Obamas in America, and even blessed the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose bashing of his own country would be far less lucrative anywhere else on the planet. The ‘racist’ here is not Geraldine Ferraro but the Rev. Wright, whose appeals to racial bitterness are supposed to be everything President Obama will transcend. Right now, it sounds more like the same-old same-old. ’God Bless America Land that I love.’ Take it away, Michelle.” — Mark Steyn
SELECT READER COMMENTS(Our servers automatically delete “Reply” messages to this e-mail. To submit or to view reader comments visit our Reader Comments page. Join the debate at the Patriot Blog.)
“Through tears of joy my wife and I want to thank you for being so bold — and patriotic — to proclaim the true Easter message on your website. Yes, patriotic because you obviously ‘love God and zealously support His authority and interests,’ to paraphrase Webster’s dictionary. God bless everything you are doing. He is risen! He is risen, indeed! Hallelujah!” — Milwaukee, Wisconsin
“Your writings on Easter are so much more what God intended than the hateful rantings coming out of a supposedly Christian Church. When the ‘news’ gets too discouraging I always turn to The Patriot Post for clearness of logic and truth. Thanks.” — Washington, North Carolina
“Although I have no issues with Christianity or any other religion, I have to disagree with the following quote printed in your Easter newsletter: ‘To our Patriot readers of faiths other than Christianity, we hope that this edition serves to deepen your understanding of our faith — and the faith of so many of our Founders.’ Many of our founding fathers were Deists and Unitarians, not Christians. They did believe in God, but not the divinity of Christ. To me this sounds like an attempt to revise history, and we all know how bad that can be.” — Round Rock, Texas
Editor’s Reply: Hence the words “so many.” We would never pretend that all of the Founders were Christians.
THE LAST WORD“Savvy Democrats have found a way to capitalize on market fears. Just as they frequently attribute every hot day to global warming — not weather — now they lay every economic problem at Iraq’s door. If the economy is not strong, they blame what Obama calls the ‘Bush/McCain war.’ Sure, it’s fair to oppose the war and cite the cost to American taxpayers. Although, once a war has started, we have to pay for it. So when Democrats talk about how the war hurts the U.S. economy, it sounds to me as if they are arguing that U.S. troops can spill their blood in Iraq, but not if gasoline hits $4 per gallon. Then the cost is too high... Forget, if you will, that Clinton and 76 other senators voted (for the resolution) to authorize the use of military force in Iraq. This is America’s war. To troops stationed in Iraq, it doesn’t matter who started it. It does matter, however, that their sacrifices count for something. And it doesn’t help U.S. troops, whose morale has been boosted by the surge’s success, when Clinton announces, as she did again last week, that the Iraq War is ‘a war we cannot win.’... Last week, Clinton said in her Iraq speech, ‘The reality is that this war has made the terrorists stronger.’ Likewise from Obama: ‘Above all, the war in Iraq has emboldened al-Qaida.’ But if the terrorists are stronger and bolder, why are they losing ground in Iraq? Why are they in hiding elsewhere? And why have leading Democrats begun to frame the Iraq War, not just as a war that cannot be won, but as an expensive engagement that is driving up the price of gasoline for Americans?” — Debra Saunders
Veritas vos Liberabit — Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis! Mark Alexander, Publisher, for The Patriot’s editors and staff. (Please pray for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm’s way around the world, and for their families — especially families of those fallen Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen, who granted their lives in defense of American liberty.)