North American Union

[Shammu]

This is the world getting ready for the anti-christ.  If it is now, or later the 10 kingdoms will come.

[Soldier4Christ]

Rudy Giuliani tied
to 'superhighways' 
Law firm represents consortia
funding NAFTA-related routes

Questions are being raised over Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani's policy on terrorism, after a report revealed he has strong ties to two foreign investment consortia working to own or lease U.S. toll roads, including the Trans-Texas Corridor 35, which is identified as part of the I-35 "NAFTA Superhighway."

Although he opposed NAFTA in 1993, Giuliani recently declined to call for building a fence on the United States border with Mexico, and he has supported a guest-worker program.

Columnist Michelle Malkin also has documented that while mayor of New York City, Giuliani kept the municipality a sanctuary city for illegal aliens, adhering to a policy first established by Mayor Ed Koch in 1989.

Now comes a new report about Giuliani's involvement with public-private-partnership projects that include NAFTA Superhighway funding and his open borders record on immigration questions, all of which could undermine his otherwise tough policy on terrorism that has resulted from the 9/11 role Giuliani played in managing New York City's response to the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Giuliani's Houston-based law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, is identified by the Texas Department of Transportation as the sole law firm representing Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., the Spanish investment consortium that has joined with Zachry Construction Company in San Antonio on the TTC project.

WND previously reported that TTC-35 is the new four-football-fields-wide car-truck-train-pipeline corridor to be built parallel to the existing I-35 as the Texas segment of the emerging Mexico-to-Canada I-35 NAFTA Superhighway.

Bracewell & Giuliani also has advised Cintra on the completion of the Comprehensive Development Agreement negotiated with Texas to develop State Highway 121 into a toll road through Collin and Denton counties.

The state highway department also gave Cintra a 50-year concession to operate SH 121 as a toll road, with Cintra agreeing to pay $2.1 billion upfront and annual lease payments totaling $700 million.

In addition, Bracewell & Giuliani successfully negotiated a $1.3 billion deal with TxDOT for Cintra-Zachry to build the remaining 40 miles of State Highway 130 as a toll road.

WND also has reported that Giuliani Capital Advisors was acquired in March by Macquarie, an Australian investment consortium which has also been involved in leasing and operating U.S. toll roads.

Further, the Federal Highway Administration has created a public-private-partnerships website on which both Cintra and Macquarie are featured as joint venture partners in the 2005 deal involving $1.83 billion paid to the City of Chicago to operate the Chicago Skyway under a 99-year lease.

The FHWA website also discloses that Cintra and Macquarie partnered in the $3.85 billion 2006 deal to operate the Indiana Toll Road on a 75-year lease.

WND has previously reported EuroMoney Seminars, a UK-based company, is holding seminars to teach state and local governments in the U.S. how to lease a wide range of public assets – from highways to water departments, to prisons and schools – to international and foreign investment groups.

Just this month, independent journalist Diane Grassi first broke the story of Giuliani's involvement with the NAFTA Superhighway, writing that, "All negotiations for Cintra were and are presently handled by the law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, of which Republican Presidential candidate, Rudolph Giuliani, has been a senior executive partner since March 2005. His law firm is the exclusive legal counsel for Cintra."

The New York Sun also earlier reported that an October 2002 contract between Mexico City and Giuliani Partners, a Giuliani consulting firm, to reduce crime was a failure.

Giuliani began the project in January 2003 with a fanfare initial tour of Mexico City that included a motorcade of a dozen bulletproof SUVs, 400 officers, and a helicopter.

Still, the Sun reported that Giuliani Partners ended up being paid less than the full $4.3 million contract price tag, despite some 20 trips to Mexico City booked by Giuliani associates over a 10-month period.

In December 2004, Bernard Kerik, the former New York City police commissioner, resigned as CEO of Giuliani-Kerik, a law enforcement-oriented subsidiary of Giuliani Partners, amidst the various scandals that developed following Kerik's nomination by President Bush to head the Department of Homeland Security.

[Soldier4Christ]

House Votes to Put Brakes on Bush Administration Plan to Allow Mexican Trucks on U.S. Highways

The House voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to delay a Bush administration plan to allow Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways.

The trucks would have to be declared safe first, the lawmakers said, and Mexico would have to give U.S. truckers the same access south of the border.

The House voted 411-3 to approve a three-year Department of Transportation pilot program that would restrict opening the border to 100 carriers based in Mexico. They would be allowed to use a maximum of 1,000 vehicles under the pilot program.

The Bush administration wanted to start a pilot program this year that would run for a year before fully opening the border to Mexican trucks.

The House bill, however, specifies criteria for the pilot program before it can start, including setting up an independent panel to evaluate the test program and getting certification from the inspector general that safety and inspection requirements have been met.

The Department of Transportation says it could be as late as 2008 before Congress's criteria are met, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Lawmakers said their major concern is whether Mexican trucks, often older than U.S. cargo vehicles, and Mexican drivers will be able to meet rigorous U.S. safety standards.

"We do not need 90,000-pound unguided missiles on our highways," said Rep. Robin Hayes, R-N.C.

American trucking companies have spent years getting their vehicles up to the Transportation Department standards, lawmakers said. Letting Mexican trucks across the border without making them meet those standards is wrong, they said.

"We're going to have a major accident somewhere, and people are going to say, 'How did this happen?" said Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.

Added Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich: "We need to ensure that this program only takes places after the Mexican companies meet the same conditions that American companies do."

Lawmakers also complained that allowing Mexican trucks greater access will cost American truckers their jobs.

"You can get a Mexican truck driver to work for a heck of a lot less than a Teamster in the United States, and you can get a Mexican dock worker to work for a heck of a lot less than a longshoreman in the United States and that's what this is ultimately designed to do," said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.

The Bush administration had planned to run a yearlong pilot program that would allow Mexican trucks beyond the current 20-mile limit from the border but the launch was halted after complaints from Congress.

Since 1982, trucks have had to stop within the buffer zone and transfer their loads to U.S. truckers to take them into the country. The legislation would allow Mexican drivers to take their loads from Mexico to any point within the country.

Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars. They include many in the trucking industry, the Bush administration and lawmakers who favor the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

Access to all U.S. highways was promised by 2000 under the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement, as was access through Mexico for U.S. carriers. That aspect has been stalled by lawsuits and disagreements between the two countries, though Canadian and U.S. trucks travel freely across the northern border.

[Faithin1]

"We do not need 90,000-pound unguided missiles on our highways," said Rep. Robin Hayes, R-N.C.

AMEN!

Lawmakers also complained that allowing Mexican trucks greater access will cost American truckers their jobs.

"You can get a Mexican truck driver to work for a heck of a lot less than a Teamster in the United States, and you can get a Mexican dock worker to work for a heck of a lot less than a longshoreman in the United States and that's what this is ultimately designed to do," said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.

Sound familiar to anyone?  Watch out! This may also become one of the jobs Americans don't want to do.

Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars. They include many in the trucking industry, the Bush administration and lawmakers who favor the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

The same excuse being used for supporting illegal immigration.  This will benefit only those businesses who will profit from cheaper labor, and the greedy politicians who are willing to sell their country to the highest bidder.

[Soldier4Christ]

It sounds all too familiar.

This will benefit only those businesses who will profit from cheaper labor, and the greedy politicians who are willing to sell their country to the highest bidder.

And all too often both of those are one and the same.

[Soldier4Christ]

North America 'partnership'
fast-tracked in border bill 
Calls for speedier regional economic
integration between U.S., Mexico

The controversial "Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007," which would grant millions of illegal aliens the right to stay in the U.S. under certain conditions, contains provisions for the acceleration of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a plan for North American economic and defense integration, WND has learned.

The bill, as worked out by Senate and White House negotiators, cites the SPP agreement signed by President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada March 23, 2005 – an agreement that has been criticized as a blueprint for building a European Union-style merger of the three countries of North America.

"It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration," the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m.

Since agreement on the major provisions of the bill was announced late last week, a firestorm of opposition has ignited across the country. Senators and representatives are reporting heavy volumes of phone calls and emails expressing outrage with the legislation they believe represents the largest "amnesty" program ever contemplated by the federal government.

President Bush yesterday attempted to tackle the concerns of those opposing the bill – denying again he would ever support an "amnesty" bill. The Senate is expected to begin debating the measure this week.

In its current form, the bill would offer probationary legal status to the estimated 15 million to 20 million illegal aliens who were in the U.S. before Jan. 1, 2007. Those who then met a series of requirements — including payment of a $5,000 fine and $2,000 in processing fees — could gain citizenship within an estimated 12 to 13 years.

In his weekly radio address, Bush said the plan "will help us resolve the status of millions of illegal immigrants who are here already, without animosity and without amnesty."

Bush said under the bill, those who "come out of the shadows" of illegal immigration will qualify for a special visa if they "pass a strict background check, pay a fine, hold a job, maintain a clean criminal record and eventually learn English."

To become citizens, he said, they must pay an additional fine, "go to the back of the line [of applications], pass a citizenship test, and return to their country to apply for their green card."

Among other provisions, including increased hiring of Border Patrol officers, the bill would establish a temporary worker program.

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, called the deal "amnesty – a pardon and reward for lawbreakers."

"Many senators claim that their deal renews respect for the rule of law," King said. "Let me respond to that absurd statement by stating clearly, you cannot simultaneously tear down and rebuild one of our constitutional principles. I took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law. The price for amnesty is the sacrifice of the rule of law."

King, ranking Republican on the Immigration Subcommittee of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, said each of the senators who struck the deal "should wear a scarlet letter 'A' for amnesty."

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., also was quick to label the bill "amnesty."

The senator said it "rewards people who broke the law with permanent legal status and puts them ahead of millions of law-abiding immigrants waiting to come to America."

"I don't care how you try to spin it, this is amnesty," DeMint said.

"I hope we don't take a thousand page bill written in secret and try to ram it through the Senate in a few days," he added. "This is a very important issue for America and we need time to debate it."

In fact, while the draft bill is far from finished, it is 326 pages in its current form.

The House is not expected to act until the Senate passes a bill.

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., called the deal "the best possible chance we will have in years to secure our borders and bring millions of people out of the shadows and into the sunshine of America."

Illegal immigrants would be allowed to come forward and obtain a "Z visa" that puts them on a track for permanent residency within eight to 13 years. Fees and a fine of $5,000 are required and heads of household first must return to their home countries.

The illegals would be able to obtain a probationary card right away to live and work in the U.S.

[Soldier4Christ]

North American union plan
headed to Congress in fall 
Powerful think tank prepares report on benefits
of integration between U.S., Mexico, Canada

A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc.

The final report, published in English, Spanish and French, is scheduled for submission to all three governments by Sept. 30, according to the Center for Strategic & International Studies.

CSIS boasts of playing a large role in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 – a treaty that set in motion a political movement many believe resembles the early stages of the European Community on its way to becoming the European Union.

"The results of the study will enable policymakers to make sound, strategic, long-range policy decisions about North America, with an emphasis on regional integration," explains Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup, director of CSIS' Mexico Project. "Specifically, the project will focus on a detailed examination of future scenarios, which are based on current trends, and involve six areas of critical importance to the trilateral relationship: labor mobility, energy, the environment, security, competitiveness and border infrastructure and logistics."

The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from all three countries with equal representation.

All of this is described in a CSIS report, "North American Future 2025 Project."

"The free flow of people across national borders will undoubtedly continue throughout the world as well as in North America, as will the social, political and economic challenges that accompany this trend," says the report. "In order to remain competitive in the global economy, it is imperative for the twenty-first century North American labor market to possess the flexibility necessary to meet industrial labor demands on a transitional basis and in a way that responds to market forces."

As WND reported last week, the controversial "Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007," which would grant millions of illegal aliens the right to stay in the U.S. under certain conditions, contains provisions for the acceleration of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a plan for North American economic and defense integration with remarkable similarities to the CSIS plan.

The bill, as worked out by Senate and White House negotiators, cites the SPP agreement signed by President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada March 23, 2005 – an agreement that has been criticized as a blueprint for building a European Union-style merger of the three countries of North America.

"It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration," the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m.

Since agreement on the major provisions of the bill was announced late last week, a firestorm of opposition has ignited across the country. Senators and representatives are reporting heavy volumes of phone calls and e-mails expressing outrage with the legislation they believe represents the largest "amnesty" program ever contemplated by the federal government.

Meanwhile, while many continue to express skepticism about a plot to integrate North America along the lines of the European Union, WND reported last week that 14 years ago, one of world's most celebrated economists and management experts said it was already on the fast track – and nothing could stop it.

Peter F. Drucker, in one of his dozens of best-selling books, "Post Capitalist Society," published in 1993, wrote that the European Community, the progenitor of the European Union, "triggered the attempt to create a North American economic community, built around the United States but integrating both Canada and Mexico into a common market."

"So far this attempt is purely economic in its goal," wrote the Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree. "But it can hardly remain so in the long run."

Drucker describes in his book the worldwide trends toward globalization that were evident back then – the creation and empowerment of transnational organizations and institutions, international environmental goals regarding carbon dioxide and agreements to fight terrorism long before 9/11.

[Soldier4Christ]

Continental currency all the rage


On Monday, Bank of Canada Gov. David Dodge told the Chicago Council on Global Affairs that North America could one day move toward a euro-style currency.

Dodge's comments add to a growing list of comments from Canadian economists, academics and government officials supporting the idea of creating the amero as a North American common currency.

Dodge argued a common North American currency would help buffer the adverse effects of exchange rate fluctuations between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar.

Currently, the Canadian dollar has surged to a 30-year high against the U.S. currency, a move Dodge noted makes Canadian products a lot less competitive for export to the U.S., Canada's major foreign market.

"In the past two months alone," Dodge told the group in Chicago, "the Canadian dollar is up about 8 percent against the U.S. dollar, and is now worth more than 91 cents (U.S.)."

In October 2006, El Universal, a Mexican newspaper published in Spanish, reported in a little-noticed article the then-president-elect of Mexico and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper in their first meeting together shared a vision of a future North America united under a common currency.

El Universal reported Gilles Duceppe, the leader of the separatist party Bloc Québécois commented at the October 2006 Calderon-Harper meeting in Ottawa that a unified North American currency might be necessary to compete in a global economy.

The Canadian, a progressive Canadian newspaper that supports preserving Canadian sovereignty, expressed surprise at Duceppe's support of what the paper characterized as "the amero."

The paper commented, "Mr. Duceppe and other elites of the so-called 'Québec sovereignty' movement view selling-out to U.S. based neo-cons to be much more commercially profitable than forming a new Québec nation."

WND has previously reported the initial concept paper on the amero was written by economist Herbert Grubel of Canada's Frasier Institute.

Another long-time supporter of the amero is the C. D. Howe Institute in Canada, a group that bills itself as "Canada's leading independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit economic policy research institute."

Since 1999, the Howe Institute has published several papers co-authored by Thomas J. Courchene of Queen's University and Richard G. Harris of Simon Fraser University calling on Canada to pursue a North American currency union.

WND has also reported Benn Steil, the director of international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations, has published an article entitled "The End of National Currency" in the May/June 2007 issue of the CFR's monthly magazine, "Foreign Affairs." Steil called for countries to abandon "monetary nationalism" in favor of regional currencies more suited for competition in a global economy.

Previously, WND reported Steve Previs, a vice president at Jeffries International Ltd., in London, told CNBC Nov. 27, 2006, the amero "is the proposed new currency for the North American Community, which is being developed right now between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico."

[nChrist]

Brothers and Sisters,

This one hit me between the eyes and I had to find out more. I suggest that you do the same. The first thing I want to say is

THIS IS UGLY!

THIS IS REAL!

I'll help you a little bit with a good link to read all about this:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=186414

However, don't stop here. Please do a Google Search and take your pick of hundreds of documents. The key search term is already in the article that Pastor Roger posted, and it works quite well. Please drop it WITH THE QUOTES into a search box for Google and find out all you want to about this TOP SECRET TREASON!

"North American Future 2025 Project"

You will find numerous areas to download PDFs on numerous issues surrounding this SECRET work being done under our noses. It appears that big businesses of various types have figured out how to line their pockets with money from some of the provisions, BUT this is very dangerous and TREASON in my opinion. Get the information and decide for yourself what you think it is.

The following areas are impacted in a major way:

Health Care
Trade
Water
Energy
Food
Peace

There is much going on behind the scenes, and it involves the previous administration. It's behind closed doors and secret, but there are reports about what has gone on behind those closed doors. Try this one on for size:

FORCED STEALTH INTEGRATION!

Much of this will be presented under the guise of "Security and Prosperity Partnership", but the real agenda is obviously a STEALTH INTEGRATION of North America - Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Open borders and the AMERO is NOT a conspiracy theory. If this isn't completely true, they certainly have a large number of sources with considerable prestige. In fact, you can wear yourself out just looking at links and deciding which ones you want to visit first.

Haven't you wondered why nobody in our government is moving to meet the demands of the people in securing our borders? How can they ignore the will of the people in a FREE country with a representative form of government? This is not a dictatorship placed in the hands of the President, or THE HOUSE, or THE SENATE. None of these entities are in charge! The PEOPLE are in charge and they are being ignored. THERE IS A BIG AND UGLY SECRET BEHIND THE SCENES, AND IT IS ABOUT TO BE REVEALED!

Do yourself a favor and BECOME INFORMED! Our government must be crazy to think that they can do all of these things WITHOUT a VOTE OF THE PEOPLE. BUT, it appears that the people won't have any say in this matter. It might even be "QUASI-LEGAL" if our so-called representatives say yes and vote for it. The thinking might be that we could vote those out of office who put things in motion, but it would go forward with the next administration anyway. I have no idea what their thinking is, but I consider it to be TREASON!

DECIDE FOR YOURSELF!

[Soldier4Christ]

Brother, you are totally right. It is not just a conspiracy theory. There are way too many government dockets on the internet that prove what this article is saying is a fact. These documents are not fake and some in fact are posted by the government itself. There are governors making state laws in an attempt to prevent it. Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) has been trying his best to inform the public on this and also attempting to stop it.

I concur that it is treason as it will put an end to the U.S. as a sovereign nation.

[Brother Jerry]

Bad idea.  Ugly idea.

The flip side to that is one that I think a merger such as this is inevitable. 

The downside to all of this is that it weakens the United States and strengthens our neighbors.
One thing that Mexico and Canada must try and remember is that if our countries join up and form a union then the terrorist groups out there will also begin to target them.  And neither one of those countries are ready to handle terrorist attacks.  And then we will have to provide additional policing for them as well.

This will spread this country far to thin for us to survive if something happens anywhere in the world.

[Soldier4Christ]

Governments never lie, they just don't tell the truth

"There is absolutely no U.S. government plan for a NAFTA superhighway of any sort," says David Bohigian, an assistant secretary of commerce, in reply to a reporter's question. The article also quotes Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., as saying that the notion of a NAFTA superhighway is based on "unfounded theories" with "no credence."

If these two gentlemen are correct, it will come as a great surprise to the North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, the Texas Department of Transportation, the City of Fort Worth and nearly two-dozen other major sponsors of a national conference: "Moving North America Forward," on "SuperCorridors" they promote. The conference, May 30-June 1, is designed to move the SuperCorridors projects forward.

Of course, these two gentlemen are not correct. NASCO boasts that it received millions in grants from the federal government. And TexDOT has been notified that its federal highway funding is in jeopardy if the state Legislature's two-year moratorium on toll-road construction is not overturned. The federal government is definitely involved in the creation of NAFTA SuperCorridors, but at an arms-length, sufficient to have "plausible deniability."




The federal government can say that the NASCO event is a "private" conference because NASCO is a private, not-for-profit organization. But is it really? Its  members, in three countries, include city, county and state governments, as well as private industries, that pay up to $50,000 per year in membership fees. Most attendees to the conference will charge the $375 registration fee, and the $200-plus per-night hotel bill to an expense account paid by taxpayers.

Bohigian and Bond should attend this conference, and then tell the American people who is promoting NAFTA SuperCorridors, if it is not the federal government, and that the "unfounded theories" are advancing toward reality every day.

NASCO's conference is not the only conference happening in Texas. Six weeks after the NASCO elite go home, grass-roots leaders from around the nation will gather a few miles down the road, in Dallas. They will pay their own registration fees and hotel bills. They are not on an expense account. The people who attend the Freedom21 National Conference are working people who want to stop the integration of Mexico, Canada and the United States into a "North American Community."

Perhaps Bohigian and Bond should attend this conference. They could discover what the people who pay their salaries really think.

The NAFTA SuperCorridors are but a part of the much broader agenda that seeks to create a North American Community. This goal is also denied by government officials – even while government employees from Mexico, Canada and the U.S. meet daily in working groups to "harmonize" rules and regulations that will "integrate" the three nations.

The current immigration bill being debated in Congress contains many of the "integration" principles set forth in the Council on Foreign Relations report "Building a North American Community."

This concept has neither been debated nor approved by Congress. Still, many of the recommendations contained in the document are being implemented as elements of separate legislation, or administratively by the executive branch. Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., and about 20 other representatives have introduced H.Con.Res. 40, which calls for stopping participation in agencies working to build a North American Community. Legislatures in at least 18 states are considering similar resolutions. Still, officially, both Congress and the executive branch deny there is an effort to create a North American Community.

Interestingly, before there was a European Union, there was a European "Community," which was sold to the Europeans as nothing more than a trade-enhancement agreement. Now, an unelected European Parliament makes laws with which the Europeans must comply. The Council on Foreign Relations' recommendations call for the creation a "North American Inter-Parliamentary Group," which sounds very much like a North American Parliament.

The North American Community now under construction is following precisely the same path that produced the European Union. Regardless of the denials, and the ridicule dispensed by those who are either ignorant or duplicitous, the erosion of U.S. borders continue. The voice of the voters is ignored, and the public-private partnerships between governments and industry beneficiaries continue to transform the United States of America into the bureaucratic state of North America.

Proponents of this transformation may call it what they will. In reality, it is destroying the foundation of the American system of governance. It is placing in the hands of appointed bureaucrats the power to make public policy. The decision to allow Mexican trucks to deliver deep inside the United States was made by appointed bureaucrats, designated by NAFTA. Neither elected officials in Congress nor in the states that must allow Mexican trucks to travel have a say in this matter. The deeper the "integration," the more power is transferred to bureaucrats.

Six weeks after the NASCO big wheels leave their Forth Worth conference, the Freedom21 conference in Dallas will teach hundreds of grass-roots leaders what they can do to stop and reverse this national tragedy.

[nChrist]

Brothers and Sisters,

I'm very sad to state with complete certainty that our governments are lying to the people of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Tons of taxpayer money have already been spent on this project - just labeled in a misleading way or with names and projects we don't recognize. It's time to realize that we can't trust our governments, and they think they can get this done AGAINST the will of the people.

We will all have to stand up and TELL our government what they will and will NOT do! That's what it boils down to. This is part of the same issue I researched yesterday. Behind closed doors, they call this

FORCED STEALTH INTEGRATION!

They could care less what the people in three countries want. They honestly do think they can get this DONE against the will of the people. The people should demand arrest warrants for anyone attempting the first steps, and all of the first steps are planned out in detail. ANYONE can find the details in 1 minute using Google.

I'll simply state that all citizens have the power to swear out the details of an arrest warrant. It wouldn't take much to determine which courts the first charges should be filed. In fact, there is probably MORE than sufficient evidence right now to file a variety of serious charges. A week of work by a competent prosecutor could probably result in 100s of indictments right now. BUT, I think it would be wise to wait a little bit and get the big fish in the net. The timing should also be right and not give anyone the wiggle room to get out of it.

By the way, I'm not a conspiracy nut. Anyone can check for themselves. There are already heavily organized citizen groups, and they are just average, ordinary folks. ANYONE can download 100s of documents and study them all they want. They didn't just get caught with their hand in the cookie jar - they got caught trying to smuggle the entire cookie factory in plain sight daylight. They have all kinds of names for projects that have already been completed that involve FAR MORE than just a superhighway. A superhighway is small potatoes compared to what they plan to do. The FORCED INTEGRATION of a full-blown North American Union is what they have planned, and it is being carried out RIGHT NOW under our noses with LIES!

I haven't heard about the people of Mexico, but the people of Canada are against this and are already organizing to STOP their government. We need to be doing the same thing. We might even have a few politicians with enough guts to stand up. I understand that several are trying to stand up right now, and they will need our support.

THIS IS NOT A JOKE!

[Soldier4Christ]

Amen!

The people of Mexico don't want it either. What most of them do want is a large part of the south western states to be "returned" to Mexican sovereignty.

[Shammu]

Think about this brothers, what is this setting up?

Could this be a setting up of the one world order............

Revelation 6:2 I looked, and there before me was a white horse! Its rider held a bow, and he was given a crown, and he rode out as a conqueror bent on conquest.

As we know, the anti-christ will rule the world for 7 years.