DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2024, 05:42:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
287027 Posts in 27572 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  ChristiansUnite Forums
|-+  Entertainment
| |-+  Politics and Political Issues (Moderator: admin)
| | |-+  Air Force One defenses, diagrams posted online
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Air Force One defenses, diagrams posted online  (Read 1133 times)
Soldier4Christ
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 61163


One Nation Under God


View Profile
« on: April 10, 2006, 11:10:16 AM »

Anti-missile info about president's planes
raises alarm, 'affects operational security'

A government document posted to the website of an unnamed Air Force base containing information about the anti-missile defense system of Air Force One, the president's official airplane, has raised an alarm with Air Force officials who say the information "affects operational security."

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that it passed on information about the website to the U.S. Secret Service last week. The data about the plane's defense systems was said to be "specific."

"It is not a good thing," said Lt. Col Bruce Alexander, director of public affairs for the Air Mobility Command's 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, which operates the fleet of presidential airplanes. "We are concerned with how it got there and how we can get it out. This affects operational security."

"Air Force One" is the air traffic control call sign of any U.S. Air Force aircraft carrying the U.S. president. Currently, two highly customized Boeing 747-200B series aircraft are maintained by the Air Force to be used solely as presidential transports.

The website document, which reportedly had not been removed as of Friday, contained detailed maps of the two plane's interiors, including the location where Secret Service agents are stationed. The location of Air Force One's medical facility "where a terrorist armed with a high-caliber sniper rifle could detonate the tanks that supply oxygen" was also shown.

But it was information about Air Force One's anti-missile systems being placed in the public domain that was of greatest concern. Intelligence about the plane's available countermeasures could help terrorists choose a more effective weapon or a different style of attack.

As WorldNetDaily reported, three U.S. congressman have confirmed they were aboard a C-130 flight to Kuwait from Iraq in January when they were attacked by a sophisticated Russian SA-18 shoulder-fired missile that required the U.S. plane to employ high-technology countermeasures to avoid being hit. The availability of the SA-18 to insurgent forces is seen as significantly increasing the danger for aircraft, particularly if it falls into the hands of terrorist groups that deploy them against civilian aircraft.

The U.S. Defense Department documents 43 civilian aircraft hit by shoulder-fired missiles worldwide. Thirty of those hit were destroyed, resulting in 900 passenger and crew deaths.

"It is tough enough for the Secret Service to do its job without this," said Leon Panetta, former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. "If I were still chief of staff, I would order the damned site (to) pull it down."

_______________________________


Note: It is pass time for security violations to be prosecuted as they once were. I clearly remember a time when such violations meant time spent in a federal jail for the person/s that commited the act. This is important and does affect the security of all Americans everywhere not just the Presidents security.


Logged

Joh 9:4  I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
Shammu
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 34871


B(asic) I(nstructions) B(efore) L(eaving) E(arth)


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2006, 11:19:05 AM »

Note: It is pass time for security violations to be prosecuted as they once were. I clearly remember a time when such violations meant time spent in a federal jail for the person/s that commited the act. This is important and does affect the security of all Americans everywhere not just the Presidents security.


AMEN brother, I also remember those times. You would also think this would fall under the Homeland Security Act.
Logged

Soldier4Christ
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 61163


One Nation Under God


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2006, 11:22:20 AM »

I would think that it should. There are many laws that have been on the books for many years that I am positive that it falls under and a person could easily be prosecuted under.

Logged

Joh 9:4  I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media