DISCUSSION FORUMS
MAIN MENU
Home
Help
Advanced Search
Recent Posts
Site Statistics
Who's Online
Forum Rules
Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
• Facebook Apps
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
• Christian RSS Feeds
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Shop
• Christian Magazines
• Christian Book Store
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

ChristiansUnite
Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 07, 2024, 04:04:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Our Lord Jesus Christ loves you.
286879 Posts in 27569 Topics by 3790 Members
Latest Member: Goodwin
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  ChristiansUnite Forums
|-+  Theology
| |-+  Apologetics (Moderator: admin)
| | |-+  Why did protistants take out Biblical books?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Why did protistants take out Biblical books?  (Read 2273 times)
Saved_byChrist
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30



View Profile
« on: June 09, 2005, 07:39:36 PM »

Hey, most of you guys here are protestant, right? Or at least a non-Catholic but still Christian demonination- unless you're non- oh, you know waht I mean. Okay, so I'm Catholic, and have always wondered why Martin Luther took books from the Bible during the Reformation. I mean...for the first 14 hundred years all Christians excepted all the books you now claim aren't a part of the Bible. Was it just that Luther read (for example) 2 Maccabees and saw that 5 verses supported our teaching on purgatory and said, "Well- this has to go! This belief isn't a part of my theological agenda- *rip, crumble, toss*. I mean...what's the deal? My friend's parents taught her that us Catholics added books later on, but- oh, don't even try that. Martin Luther and his Protestant Reformers removed them, and that is the truth.  so..... why? Why do'nt your churches use the version of the Bible that Jesus and the apostles used? Why is it that your church doesn't use the whole Bible?
Logged

Terrorists have killed 3000 Americans since 1990.....Abortionists have killed 4000 Americans since yesturday.

God gave us 86,400 seconds a day. Have you taken one to say 'thank you'?
Saved_byChrist
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2005, 07:41:09 PM »

Sorry about spelling "Protestant" wrong in the title- accident.
Logged

Terrorists have killed 3000 Americans since 1990.....Abortionists have killed 4000 Americans since yesturday.

God gave us 86,400 seconds a day. Have you taken one to say 'thank you'?
Bronzesnake
Guest
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2005, 02:00:11 AM »

Actually Martin Luther didn't remove any books from the bible, he made an attempt to remove the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation from the canon (partially because they were perceived to go against certain Protestant doctrines, partially because of the early debate over their inclusion), but this was not accepted.

 The canon of the bible was selected through a set of criteria including whether the text was written by an eyewitness to the events, or by someone who got the content through an actual eyewitness. They also considered the authenticity of the authors. There are no serious challenges against the authenticity of the four gospel writers; on the other hand the Gnostic books all have names ascribed to them, which are not the original authors.

Also taken into consideration was whether the text followed along with the known authentic texts, and whether or not Jesus would have made certain comments. Some of the Gnostic texts have outlandish verses in them; one that comes to mind has a gigantic 80 foot tall Jesus storming through the landscape.
Logged
Soldier4Christ
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 61023


One Nation Under God


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2005, 02:43:12 AM »

Luther did not remove any books from the Bible. He placed any books that were not a part of the Hebrew canonical in a separate portion calling them Apocrypha. He was not the first one to tag them as Apocrypha though. Jerome in 400 AD translated the OT from Hebrew into Greek and called Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach [or "Ecclesiasticus"], and Baruch the Apocrypha. So Luther just followed suit after Jerome on the OT.

As Bronze said Luther attempted to remove books four NT from their normal order and place them at the end calling them less than canonical.

 

Logged

Joh 9:4  I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2005, 04:03:12 PM »






The original 1611 King James included the Apocrypha.





Logged
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2005, 04:07:50 PM »

Hey, most of you guys here are protestant, right? Or at least a non-Catholic but still Christian demonination- unless you're non- oh, you know waht I mean. Okay, so I'm Catholic, and have always wondered why Martin Luther took books from the Bible during the Reformation. I mean...for the first 14 hundred years all Christians excepted all the books you now claim aren't a part of the Bible. Was it just that Luther read (for example) 2 Maccabees and saw that 5 verses supported our teaching on purgatory and said, "Well- this has to go! This belief isn't a part of my theological agenda- *rip, crumble, toss*. I mean...what's the deal? My friend's parents taught her that us Catholics added books later on, but- oh, don't even try that. Martin Luther and his Protestant Reformers removed them, and that is the truth.  so..... why? Why do'nt your churches use the version of the Bible that Jesus and the apostles used? Why is it that your church doesn't use the whole Bible?


Because it's too heavy to carry around! Grin Grin Grin


Logged
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2005, 04:10:09 PM »

Hey, most of you guys here are protestant, right? Or at least a non-Catholic but still Christian demonination- unless you're non- oh, you know waht I mean. Okay, so I'm Catholic, and have always wondered why Martin Luther took books from the Bible during the Reformation. I mean...for the first 14 hundred years all Christians excepted all the books you now claim aren't a part of the Bible. Was it just that Luther read (for example) 2 Maccabees and saw that 5 verses supported our teaching on purgatory and said, "Well- this has to go! This belief isn't a part of my theological agenda- *rip, crumble, toss*. I mean...what's the deal? My friend's parents taught her that us Catholics added books later on, but- oh, don't even try that. Martin Luther and his Protestant Reformers removed them, and that is the truth.  so..... why? Why do'nt your churches use the version of the Bible that Jesus and the apostles used? Why is it that your church doesn't use the whole Bible?



Jesus and His disciples used the Old Testament.  There was no such thing as the New Testament at the time of Christ.



Logged
JudgeNot
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1993


Jesus, remember me... Luke 23:42


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2005, 04:16:33 PM »

Hey cris!

Are you...
Logged

Covering your tracks is futile; God knows where you're going and where you've been.
JPD
JudgeNot
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1993


Jesus, remember me... Luke 23:42


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2005, 04:17:02 PM »

bumping up your
Logged

Covering your tracks is futile; God knows where you're going and where you've been.
JPD
JudgeNot
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1993


Jesus, remember me... Luke 23:42


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2005, 04:17:28 PM »

post count???

 Grin
 Grin
 Cheesy
Logged

Covering your tracks is futile; God knows where you're going and where you've been.
JPD
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2005, 04:28:52 PM »

Hey cris!

Are you...


It wasn't intentional.  I guess I must have a split personality.  Grin

                               Grin




             Grin





                                                Grin


Logged
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2005, 04:42:51 PM »


Hey JD........................

R U


Logged
JudgeNot
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1993


Jesus, remember me... Luke 23:42


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2005, 04:46:51 PM »

 Cool
Logged

Covering your tracks is futile; God knows where you're going and where you've been.
JPD
cris
Gold Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1183


I'm a llama!


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2005, 04:48:25 PM »

O 4 GET IT. Lips Sealed

Logged
Bronzesnake
Guest
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2005, 05:37:46 PM »

Hey, most of you guys here are protestant, right? Or at least a non-Catholic but still Christian demonination- unless you're non- oh, you know waht I mean. Okay, so I'm Catholic, and have always wondered why Martin Luther took books from the Bible during the Reformation. I mean...for the first 14 hundred years all Christians excepted all the books you now claim aren't a part of the Bible. Was it just that Luther read (for example) 2 Maccabees and saw that 5 verses supported our teaching on purgatory and said, "Well- this has to go! This belief isn't a part of my theological agenda- *rip, crumble, toss*. I mean...what's the deal? My friend's parents taught her that us Catholics added books later on, but- oh, don't even try that. Martin Luther and his Protestant Reformers removed them, and that is the truth.  so..... why? Why do'nt your churches use the version of the Bible that Jesus and the apostles used? Why is it that your church doesn't use the whole Bible?


Because it's too heavy to carry around! Grin Grin Grin




Made bible thumping very laborius! Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media