One more reason to vote for Bush!!

[Luke O]

Luke O Said:

And where are the weapons of mass destruction???....yeah funny how politicians are trying to sweep that statement under the carpet

Luke, they were obviously moved or destroyed. The whole world knew they were there. Further, Saddam used them, and there are mass graves to prove it. So, why didn't he cooperate with the inspectors or obey the UN resolutions? Several investigations SUGGEST that they were moved into Libya or Syria.

Love In Christ,
Tom

They might of been moved, saying that thought Iraq probably bought them of the US in the first place.  Plus let's review both countries the US and Iraq, both countries have weapons of mass destruction, and at the moment i'd say the US are the most unstable with them.  Answer me this, Sadaam knew he was going down, so why didn't he fire the weapons of mass destruction at the US or UK then? i mean he'd have nothing to loose would he.

The whole UN resoultions thing is stupid, would the US let any other country come into America and have a look at there weapons of mass destruction, i don't think they would, Iraq simply did what the US would do. in my opinion anywayz

[ollie]

President Bush continues to oppose allowing American seniors to purchase lower-priced, FDA-approved medicines from Canada.[1] His administration has claimed those prescription drugs would be unsafe, and is working to block a vote on bipartisan Senate legislation to make reimportation legal.[2] But as a new drug industry whistleblower notes, the scare tactics are dishonest and untrue.

Dr. Peter Rost, vice-president of marketing for the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, recently came out and debunked the White House's argument, saying reimportation "has been proven to be safe in Europe" and that "The safety issue is a made-up story."[3] Rost's comments are consistent with the Bush administration's own FDA officials who have been unable to provide any evidence that medicines from Canada are unsafe.[4]

President Bush's opposition to reimportation is backed by the drug industry - the same special interest that has donated lavishly to the GOP. According to the non-profit watchdog Public Campaign, the drug industry has given Republican candidates more than $36 million since 1999. President Bush has raked in more than $418,000 from the pharmaceutical industry, and lists many drug industry executives and lobbyists as his top fundraisers.[5]

Sources:

1. "Big Pharma fears a Kerry win will lead to curbs on drug prices," The Independent Portfolio, 9/22/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3486872&l=59520.
2. "Frist won't bring drug import legislation up for vote," The Tennessean, 9/16/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3486872&l=59521.
3. "Surprise Support For Drug Importing," Washington Post, 9/14/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3486872&l=59522.
4. "FDA lacks examples of Canadian drugs harming Americans," Knight Ridder, 11/26/03,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3486872&l=59523.
5. "Paybacks: Prescription Drugs," Public Campaign, 8/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3486872&l=59524.

[sincereheart]

[2nd Timothy]

Worth a thousand words  

[poohbear]

I got this in an email about 1 month ago. Does any know if this was really said?

Don't know whether or not he said this, but here it is... (things that make you
>go, "hmmm")
>
>The Lord has a way of revealing those of us who really know him, and those that
>don't!  Think about it!  Kerry gave a big speech last week about how his faith
>is so "important" to him.  In this attempt to convince the American people that
>we should consider him for president, he announced that his favorite Bible
>verse is John 16:3.
>
>Of course the speech writer meant John 3:16, but nobody in the Kerry
>camp was familiar enough with scripture to catch the error.  And do you know
>what  John 16:3 says?  John 16:3 says; "They will do such things because they
>have not known the Father or me."  The Spirit works in strange ways.

[Symphony]

 

Wow, very interesting, poohbear.


Verbalizing John 16:3 is quite a bit different than saying John 3:16 - it doesn't flow off the tongue quite as easily.

So it's difficult realizing someone wouldn't recognize it immediately, when they read it, unless they really had never heard of it before.

It sounds authentic.  I sure would like to know if it were true or  not.

Quite funny.  And ironic - to say the least!

[poohbear]

I know, now when I listen to there speaches I really pay attention to every word.....Who ever caught that one was right on que....I think that is something to think about. That we arent really listening to everything that they say. And scarey to think those little things could really make a difference on who you vote for ect.....

[Evangelist]

While the current report from US Weapons leader Duelfer is making the rounds, being played up by the news media, and trumpeted loudly by the Kerry campaign as "proof", the following two items of "proof" are being quietly ignored.  Why?
-------------------------------------------------
Another chemical weapon has been discovered in Iraq – a 122-mm Borak rocket warhead containing sarin traces, according to an exclusive report in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by WorldNetDaily.com.

 The warhead was found earlier this month, and U.S. military commanders believe there are more to be found.

In fact, according to G2B's military sources, chemical attacks are expected in Baghdad.

 In May, at least two other projectiles were found with traces of chemical weapons – mustard gas and sarin.

 On May 2, the U.S. Explosive Ordnance Disposal team found an improvised explosive device in the Baghdad area. It was later found to be a 155-mm round with a cracked nose in the fuze-well area. The technical escort unit performed testing using a mass spectrometer and found traces of sulfur mustard.

 The Army concluded the projectile was most likely an old Iraqi round from the Iran-Iraq war era and not one improvised by anti-U.S. terrorists.

 In addition, in a totally separate incident on May 15, the same disposal team found another 155-mm projectile in the Baghdad area that tested positive for the nerve agent sarin. In this case, the round was set up as an IED, but it is not clear the terrorists were aware of the nerve agent inside the projectile.

------------------------------------------------

(CNSNews.com) - Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam's government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al Qaeda.

Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States.

 Among the organizations mentioned are those affiliated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri, two of the world's most wanted terrorists. Zarqawi is believed responsible for the kidnapping and beheading of several American civilians in Iraq and claimed responsibility for a series of deadly bombings in Iraq Sept. 30. Al-Zawahiri is the top lieutenant of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, allegedly helped plan the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the U.S., and is believed to be the voice on an audio tape broadcast by Al-Jazeera television Oct. 1, calling for attacks on U.S. and British interests everywhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------

And a final note of who (besides the communists, socialists, neo-nazi's and others) is now pulling for (s)Kerry to win.
------------------------------
The Muslim American Political Action Committee has formally endorsed Sen. John Kerry for president.

 "What does it mean for Muslim Americans if President Bush is re-elected?" asked Mukit Hossain, president of MAPAC, in making the announcement. "It means more constricting laws and policies to curtail the civil liberties of the Muslim Americans, and harsher foreign policies toward Muslim countries - in the name of combating terrorism. It also means a continuing and menacing rise of anti-Muslim sentiment in America, covertly nurtured by the neoconservatives, and openly fanned by government officials like Lt. General (William) Boykin and Attorney General John Ashcroft."

 Hossain, a telecommunications entrepreneur who emigrated from Bangladesh, said the decision to endorse Kerry came after months of considerations, discussions with Muslim American leaders across the country, and extensive dialog with the Kerry campaign and the Democratic Party leadership.

[2nd Timothy]

I got this in an email about 1 month ago. Does any know if this was really said?

Don't know whether or not he said this, but here it is... (things that make you
>go, "hmmm")
>
>The Lord has a way of revealing those of us who really know him, and those that
>don't!  Think about it!  Kerry gave a big speech last week about how his faith
>is so "important" to him.  In this attempt to convince the American people that
>we should consider him for president, he announced that his favorite Bible
>verse is John 16:3.
>
>Of course the speech writer meant John 3:16, but nobody in the Kerry
>camp was familiar enough with scripture to catch the error.  And do you know
>what  John 16:3 says?  John 16:3 says; "They will do such things because they
>have not known the Father or me."  The Spirit works in strange ways.

Hi Poohbear!  Welcome to CU

I was a little shocked the first time I heard that one too.  But SincereHeart (I believe it was, or maybe Ollie?) pointed out that this was on snopes.com as false.

Try this link.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bibleverse.asp

Grace and Peace!

[nChrist]

Evangelist,

Brother, I think that I know why the mainstream news picks and chooses what they do. They are ultra liberal and would hate to see George Bush remain as President of the United States. George Bush represents everything they hate, so they are either omitting news that would be positive for George Bush, or they are grossly distorting what has the potential to be negative. It's unbearable for them to have a Christian in the White House, especially one who has taken a stand for Biblical teachings (i.e. anti-abortion, anti-same sex marriage, prayer, the mere mention of Jesus Christ, preservation of traditional American values that are most definitely Christian).

Love In Christ,
Tom

[Expose]

I just want to make another general comment here. Anarchists are nto against freedom in any way. Anarchists are dedicated to true freedom, especialy in the case of speech.

They aren't "terrorists", they want free media and public rights that are being stripped away.

Their difference is that they don't want any form of governemnt at all; which would be Great if they were all Christian; which is part of why I'm going to scold you all for being so critical of a group you seem to know little to nothing about.

God said he'd prefer Israel had no king and followed God alone. This is actually similar to what anarchists have in mind. The bad side difference is that hey'd have a sort of comitee or a panel to make widespread decisions; which would lead right back to a Luciferian state of mind in a different direction.

[nChrist]

Expose - JitC? Said:

Their difference is that they don't want any form of governemnt at all; which would be Great if they were all Christian; which is part of why I'm going to scold you all for being so critical of a group you seem to know little to nothing about.

I dealt with all kinds of anarchists in 25 years of police work. I know more than I want to know about them. Most of the ones I know are sitting in prison. Civilized societies just don't buy or tolerate the overall view of anarchists which can be generally stated as:  no rules, no law. The result of such backward thinking is "rule in a jungle mentality, dog eat dog, survival of the fittest, and only the strong survive." The society, in general, has no rules, law, or obligation to protect the weak, the ill, the children, or the elderly. Baboons have a better system of civilization than most anarchists.

I would simply say: NO THANKS JITC!

Tom

[sincereheart]

[2nd Timothy]

stop it!  your killin me!

[Evangelist]

just want to make another general comment here. Anarchists are nto against freedom in any way. Anarchists are dedicated to true freedom, especialy in the case of speech.

They aren't "terrorists", they want free media and public rights that are being stripped away.

Their difference is that they don't want any form of governemnt at all; which would be Great if they were all Christian; which is part of why I'm going to scold you all for being so critical of a group you seem to know little to nothing about.

God said he'd prefer Israel had no king and followed God alone. This is actually similar to what anarchists have in mind. The bad side difference is that hey'd have a sort of comitee or a panel to make widespread decisions; which would lead right back to a Luciferian state of mind in a different direction.

Main Entry:  an·ar·chist
 Pronunciation:  'a-n&r-kist, -"när-
 Function:  noun
1 : one who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power
2 : one who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy; especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order
- anarchist or an·ar·chis·tic  /"a-n&r-'kis-tik, -(")när-/ adjective


Similar to what God had in mind? They (anarchists) would have a committee or panel to make decisions??

It would seem that you don't have a complete grasp on what anarchists are, or truly believe...in other words, you seem to know little to nothing about them.

Consider yourself scolded and Expose(d).