It is little tough.
It can be viewed in two ways.  Man's and God's.
Man's - given the nature of the broad labelling, it will take thousand's of pages of clauses to define the act (abortion or homo perversion (?!!) ) in different circumstances and degrees.  Thus a committee can sit and think through for a decade and do whatever.

God's - let them come to me, with repentance.  I will forgive them and embrace them and take it on from there.
As for those who do not repent, You (this refers to You and I) take the message of cross to them so that I will convict them and make them worthy

So there, I told you it is tough

Accepting is salvation.  Baptism is professing the acceptance of that salvation brought to us by grace.
Baptism definitely is no means to salvation.  Who would not profess to the world through this act/ritual - to begin with?

In my opinion (also) infant baptism is not biblical.  Baptism follows salvation.  Beginning from John the Baptist, people repented, confessed and then took baptism.  An infant is in no position to do this.  Accepting Jesus is a vary conscious decision.

I know it is a oft debated topic.  I was babpized when i was an infant.  After accepting Jesus Christ, there was not anyone to suggest baptism to me.  But, when the right time came, I did it without tarrying.